1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

A better option for NATO than an Islamic Turkey

Reader comment on item: The Erdoğan Enigma

Submitted by Saul Stein, Apr 21, 2017 at 14:07

As you point out in your article about Erdogan, it is time we consider whether an Islamic dictatorship, or any dictatorship for that matter, belongs in NATO. If the U.S. is forced to remove Turkey from NATO, we must consider a suitable replacement. My nomination goes to Israel.

True, Israel would not receive universal approval, but it has much to recommend it. For example:

1. Militarily, Israel would be at least an "in kind" replacement for Turkey. It would more than likely be an upgrade.
2. Israel can be counted on to spend more than 2% of GDP on Defense. This is a key necessity for NATO at this time.
3. Accepting Israel into NATO provides and excellent opportunity to remove Israel from the list of nations receiving U.S. Aid. As I've heard you say before, Israel's Economy is strong enough to come up with the $3.5 Billion or so per year that it receives from the U.S. Better yet, this annual sum can be put to use helping to alleviate the Syrian refugee crisis, which would benefit both Europe and the U.S. It's time Israel gets off "the dole" and becoming a member of NATO would be a suitable way to address Israel's security needs.
4. This would send a very strong signal to Iran, Nuclear Deal or not.

There are potential problems, of course:
1. Israel isn't exactly in the North Atlantic. But neither is Turkey, or Italy, or Greece for that matter.
2. Russia won't like it one bit. But they'd complain if we brought Albania into NATO. Or Singapore.
3. There will be many in the European Left who will complain - like France, Italy, Sweden and probably Germany. But by using the money that use to go to Israeli Financial Aid for helping solve the refugee crisis, and providing a way to keep those refugees in the Middle East rather than coming to Europe, I'd bet those countries could be brought in line.
4. The Palestinians will obviously have a conniption fit. But so what? Until they come around to admitting that Israel is the historical Homeland of the Jewish People, for which there is overwhelming archeological evidence (Titus's Arch in Rome - hello!), they need to be told that they are hopelessly out of touch with reality and it's time to "get a grip". Who knows, maybe admitting Israel into NATO will send the message to the Palestinians that it's time they realize the need to accept Israel as their neighbor and make a deal that works for everyone.

The pros for this proposal are mostly pragmatic and substantive, while the cons have more to do with emotional reaction to admitting the Jewish State to any International Forum (in other words - bigotry). Admitting Israel into NATO, with or without removing Turkey, makes NATO stronger while at the same time providing other benefits for Europe and perhaps the Middle East as well. Erdogan's obsession with power provides us with an opportunity, assuming we can think outside of the box.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (15) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Erdogan, just a criminal [95 words]CaraxMay 10, 2017 14:40239023
Erdogan is there to stay [187 words]Nazim CairoApr 23, 2017 20:26238750
1Erdogan isn't too mysterious. Kushner is. [323 words]Michael SApr 22, 2017 17:23238719
Another Enigma: Why The Religious Trend In Turkey? [160 words]DaveApr 22, 2017 14:56238711
2Manipulation [498 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Hakan ErdemirApr 21, 2017 19:04238669
Posturing for Things to Come... [147 words]M ToveyApr 24, 2017 11:00238669
A better option for NATO than an Islamic Turkey [505 words]Saul SteinApr 21, 2017 14:07238660
Theocracies do not belong to any organization of nations [107 words]PrashantApr 22, 2017 07:59238660
The possible future of NATO [166 words]Michael SApr 27, 2017 02:53238660
Old NATO vs New NATO - Talking Turkey [228 words]M ToveyMay 3, 2017 14:17238660
1Let's Call It What It Is! [23 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Barry BlackApr 21, 2017 12:47238658
Study Erdogan Speeches Against Females [40 words]DENNIS ALLEN DURKOPApr 21, 2017 12:43238657
1Mystery #3: Gulen - SOLVED - False Flag coup d'etat operation used to eliminate the opposition within Turkey [225 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Eric BermanApr 21, 2017 12:41238655
1Erdogan does not perceive that price is too high for two reasons [74 words]Eric BermanApr 22, 2017 10:08238655
1Any NATO Country Leader who Derides the West as "Crusaders" In Speeches is a Suspected Islamist [83 words]GWKApr 21, 2017 11:25238652

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to A better option for NATO than an Islamic Turkey by Saul Stein

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2017 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes