69 million page views

grudging acceptane - if they're lucky

Reader comment on item: More on the Burkini Ban
in response to reader comment: Burkini

Submitted by Mohammed Waza Khiddif id'Ullah (Australia), Sep 12, 2016 at 05:30

Women should be allowed to wear WHATEVER THEY WANT on the beach. Whether that be a bikini, a swimming costume, a skirt, leggings, a dress, pyjamas, trousers, a jacket, a coat, a jumper, a hoody, a Burkini! It's their body so should be their choice whether to strip off or cover up.

Many muslims in the West have a problem with that though. I've actually heard muslim males called white women in bikinis 'whores'.

". I am wondering how this law could be implemented in Australia as stinger suits and wet suits are not dissimilar to Burkinis. Will they be outlawed too?"

Stingers only occur in the far north of Australia - not where the vast majority of the population lives. People of both sexes wear stinger suits for survival, to protect against otherwise fatal box jellyfish stings. Not because they are narcissistic ideologues have some imagined religious duty to uphold.

"... I wonder how many English people were saying "Multi-Culturalism does not work" when they were busy invading and taking over other people's countries!? "

I ask myself a similar question - I wonder how many arabs were saying 'multi-culturalism does not work' when they were busy invading and taking over Coptic North Africa? And enslaving and selling millions of sub-Saharan Africans. But back to the original question -
Very few - as it was not in those times a social meme foisted on people by deluded politicians looking to create utopian societies.

In a practical sense - arabs in the Middle East and elsewhere are opposed to multiculturalism in their own regions. They are very opposed to multi-ethnic, multi-faith Israel. And simply do no tolerate religious diversity in their own countries or if they do - grudgingly so - eg. Egypt.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
The nanny state is ubiquitous and obnoxious [334 words]DaveMay 22, 2022 15:26281632
the burkini is a symptom of a greater illness [99 words]Charles MartelOct 5, 2016 14:06233174
2The NYT v Manuel Valle [92 words]dhimmi no moreSep 7, 2016 17:41232411
Burkini [1819 words]Iftikhar AhmadSep 7, 2016 12:44232399
1grudging acceptane - if they're lucky [293 words]Mohammed Waza Khiddif id'UllahSep 12, 2016 05:30232399
This is all sopping wet. [173 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
LynnAug 31, 2016 21:03232067
The Spirit Of Europe Is Conformism [143 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DaveAug 31, 2016 18:02232063
Religious intolerance ? [33 words]marlanSep 2, 2016 04:53232063
America Has Limits To Tolerance [15 words]DaveSep 4, 2016 11:19232063
Burkini Brouhaha [72 words]Kepha HorAug 31, 2016 09:38232049
2My response to the Burkini! [347 words]Debra WeinerAug 28, 2016 07:40231874
3Can women wear bikini in muslim countries? Why should muslims be allow to promote their religion in secular coutries? [125 words]secularity means freedomSep 2, 2016 12:58231874
My response to Dr. Pipes [567 words]marlanAug 27, 2016 11:09231826
Respect [71 words]JoAug 27, 2016 08:03231816
Ban the Burkini [232 words]JoAug 27, 2016 07:56231815
It is not a MUST in Islam [66 words]LunaAug 28, 2016 04:14231815
One day the same court might ban topless bathing [109 words]AnonAug 26, 2016 16:33231802

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to grudging acceptane - if they're lucky by Mohammed Waza Khiddif id'Ullah

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)