Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The True Face of Islam
Reader comment on item: The Dobbs List: "Militant Islam Reaches America"

Submitted by K Abraham (United States), Sep 1, 2002 at 21:10

I must confess that I totally disagree with Mr. Pipes. He seems to be trying to tame his opinion of Islam, sugar-coating it, and sanitizing it. Specifically, stating that militant Islam is our enemy bears no relationship to reality. The fact that there are some secular Muslims does not mean that there is a secular Islam. The fact that there are some moderate Muslims does not mean that there is a moderate Islam. Secular Muslims are a small minority- they simply don't know Islam. Moderate Muslims are certainly a good portion, yet personal experience will show that an overwhelming majority of them will quickly side with fundamentalists if Islam is attacked.

It is true that Islam, not just militant Islam, is an ideology/religion, just like Nazism and Communism, Judiasm, and Christianity. But to put Islam on the same footing as Christianity and Judiasm is simply a humanistic philosophy, that is pervading our society, and shows a total lack of understanding in comparative religions.

The Muslim world knows the enemy, and they are willing to die for the cause. However, we in the West have sanitized Islam, and created our own picture of Islam, and have lost our desire to fight. The enemy is us and, unfortunately, humanists who are trying to claim that all religons are equal.

Islam at its core is non-peaceful, and violent, regardless of how many moderate Muslims exist. The moderate Islam has no resemblence to the Islam of the Koran and to the Islam of history.

Can you explain to me, why does a Muslim in Pakistan, who has never seen a Jew, or set foot in Israel, have such a deep hatred for Jews, unless it is a dicate of his religion?

Obviously all of these points can be elaborated at length. You can read and write as much as you like about Islam. It's not the same as growing up in the midst of an Islamic culture.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title By Date
Christians or Jews blowing themselves up [42 words]RonSep 29, 2005 22:49
MY COMMENTS. THANKS [30 words]REX LOVELLSep 26, 2005 15:26
Ignorance is not bliss [170 words]Christopher A.Jan 10, 2004 00:37
DIFFERENT RELIGON [31 words]ADNAN SHAHNov 24, 2003 02:02
the importance of religion [9 words]SarahFeb 13, 2007 07:03
Muslims Nazis? [98 words]Gorkem CillerNov 3, 2002 15:54
People only hate what they don't know [198 words]Ali HassanNov 3, 2002 15:47
Is Modernization Possible? [73 words]GEORGE VALDSHTEINSep 26, 2002 03:06
Empowering moderates is not a new thesis... [112 words]Amjad M KhanSep 12, 2002 00:58
Label describing Daniel Pipes [26 words]Alfred RitterSep 2, 2002 15:51
Understanding Totalitatian Thought [208 words]J. W. BeasonSep 2, 2002 13:12
Did you say Islam is like (similar to)Christianity and Judaism ? [173 words]Saul PfefferSep 2, 2002 10:48
Thank you [125 words]Elizabeth Duncan (Margie Mcd's sister)Sep 2, 2002 02:18
⇒ The True Face of Islam [323 words]K AbrahamSep 1, 2002 21:10
Read the true history [266 words]F. ShawkiSep 1, 2002 17:19
Moderate Muslims are the average Germans of WWII
[w/response] [272 words]
David RosenbergSep 1, 2002 13:55
Amorphous number of Islamist adherants
[w/response] [70 words]
Dan SchwartzSep 1, 2002 10:22

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page