|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Church bells vs. muezzin's callReader comment on item: Which Privileges for Islam? Submitted by Sriram (United States), Mar 21, 2005 at 15:04 Church Bells are pleasant and don't have any semantic content. After all, even buddhist and hindu temples have bells.The Muezzin's call can be jarring by contrast to those who don't buy into the exclusivity of Islam; Restricting such a call to once a week may be fine but what's to prevent it from becoming a 5 times a day affair in the future? As a non-Christian, I don't mind hearing bells of any kind as long as they are not too frequent or unmelodious Therefore I don't see why the two need to be equated. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||