41 readers online now

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

Moderate Islam: A Pipe Dream!
Reader comment on article: [The Search for Moderate Islam:] A Reply to Lawrence Auster
in response to reader comment: Moderate Islam: A Pipe Dream!

Submitted by A (Keen) Student of Islam (India), Mar 1, 2005 at 03:32

Tuesday, March 01, 2005

Dear Dr. Pipes

Thank you for posting my earlier comment on your weblog.

This is a supplement to my letter about "radical vs. moderate Islam" sent to you last week.

At the time of dispatching that letter, however, I was not in possession of precise references that convincingly demolish the myth of a wholesome contribution of Islam to human excellence.

I have since been able to acquire them. But because I wrote them down as dictated over phone by a friend, it is quite likely that what I have reproduced below is not verbatim. This want notwithstanding, the general drift of what these formidable authorities have stated exposes the myth for what it is. In any case, the original sources can always be checked up.

These show quite clearly that the Muslim Arab contributed practically nothing in terms of knowledge or culture. What development there was under Islamic rule, had most certainly been entirely due to exponents of non-Muslim cultures who had been forced into Islam.

Those references are as follows:

From Islam and the Psychology of the Musulman, Andre Servier, p. 6-7

"The author [Jules Lemaitre] declared with fine assurance that Arab literature was the richest and most brilliant of all known literatures, and that the Arab civilization was highest and most splendid.

"Now these writings were not the original production of Arab genius, but translations of Greek works from the Schools of Alexandria and Damascus, first drawn up in Syriac and then in Arabic at the request of the Abbasid Caliphate, by Syrian scribes who had gone over to Islam.

"The thought of Greek authors was drowned in the religious formulae imposed by Islamic dogma; the name of the author translated was not mentioned so that European scholars could have no suspicion that the work before them was a translation and imitation, or an adaptation; and so they attributed to the Arabs what really belonged to the Greeks…..

"It is well to remember that at that epoch the greater part of the works of antiquity were unknown in Europe. The Arabs thus passed for inventors and initiators, feigning reality that they were nothing but copyists. It was not until later, at the time of the Renaissance, when the manuscripts of the original authors were discovered, that the error was detected….."

From History of the Arabs, Philip Hitti, p. 174

"By the conquest of the Fertile Crescent and the lands of Persia and Egypt, the Arabians came into possession of not only geographical areas but of the earliest seats of civilization in the whole world. Thus the sons of the desert fell heirs to these hoary cultures with their long traditions going back to Greco-Roman, Iranian, Pharaohnic and Assyrio-Babylonian times. In art and architecture, in philosophy and medicine, in science and literature, in government, the original Arabians had nothing to teach and everything to learn…..with an ever-sharp sense of curiosity and with latent potentialities ……these Muslim Arabians in collaboration with and by the help of their subject peoples began now to assimilate, adopt and reproduce their intellectual and aesthetic heritage."

From The Arabs in History, Bernard Lewis, p. 131

"DURING the peak period of the Arab and Islamic Empires in the Near and Middle East a flourishing civilization grew up that is usually known as Arabic. It was not brought ready-made by the Arab invaders from the desert, but was created after the conquests by the collaboration of many peoples, Arabs, Persians, Egyptians and others. Nor was it even purely Muslim, for many Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians were among its creators. But its chief medium of expression was Arabic, and it was dominated by Islam and its outlook on life. It was these two things, their language and their faith, which were the great contributions of the Arab invaders to the new and original civilization which developed under their aegis."

p. 306

"The history of Muslim arms under Al-Mahdi and Al-Rasheed over the inveterate Byzantine enemy undoubtedly shed its luster on this period…. what has rendered this age especially illustrious in world annals is the fact that it witnessed the most momentous intellectual awakening in the history of Islam and one of the most significant in the whole history of thought and culture. The awakening was due in a large measure to foreign influences, partly Indo-Persian and Syrian but mainly Hellenic, and was marked by translation into Arabic from Persian, Sanskrit, Syriac and Greek. Starting with very little science, philosophy or literature of his own, the Arabian Moslem, who brought with him from the desert a keen sense of intellectual curiosity, a voracious appetite for learning and many latent faculties, soon became, as we have learned before, beneficiary and heir of the older and more cultured peoples whom he conquered or encountered. As in Syria he adopted the already existing Aramaic civilization, itself influenced by the latter Greek, so did he in Iraq adopt the same civilization influenced by the Persian."

p. 306

"India acted as an early source of inspiration, especially in wisdom, literature and mathematics. About 771 CE an Indian traveler introduced into Baghdad a treatise on Astronomy, Sidhhanta, which by order of Al-Mansur was translated by Muhammad bin Ibrahim Al-Fazari (between 796 and 806) who subsequently became the first astronomer in Islam. The stars had of course interested the Arabians since desert days, but no scientific study had been undertaken until this time. Islam added impetus to the study of Astronomy as a means for fixing the direction in which prayers should be conducted Kaaba-ward. The famous Al-Khwarizimi (850 CE) based his widely known astronomical table on Al-Fazari's work and syncretized the Indian and Greek system of Astronomy, at the same time adding his own contribution. Among other translations of astronomical works from of this period were those from Persian to Arabic by Al-Fadl bin Nawbakht (815 CE), the chief librarian of Al-Rasheed.

"This same Indian traveler brought a treatise on mathematics by means of which the numerals called in Europe Arabic, and by the Arabs Indian (Hindu), entered into the Muslim world. Later, in the 9th century, the Indians made another contribution to Arabic mathematical science, the decimal system."

p.36

"Theological literature proper began under the influences of Syriac Christianity, later also of Greek thought. Greek influence was fundamental in philosophy and all the sciences: Mathematics, Astronomy, Geography, Chemistry, Physics, Natural History And Medicine. The immense effect of translation of Greek books either directly from the original or from Syriac versions produced a new growth of learning in the 9th and 10th centuries. Greek schools have survived in Alexandria and elsewhere…. The movement of translation began under the Umayyids…. The Caliph Mamun (813-833) who established a school of translators in Baghdad with a library and regular staff."

From Geschichte der herr Schendem Ideen des Islam by Von Kremer, (Translated by Khuda Bakhsh, New Delhi)

"Arabic grammar is a creation of foreigners, the Armenians and Persians, and was brought into being by the need felt by foreigners of learning to write and speak the Arabic language correctly; particularly by non-Arabs who wished to devote themselves to learned studies. The founder of Arabic grammar was the foreigner of Armenian and Persian nationality who had gone over to Islam. When it becomes a fashion to make a show of learned studies, write books, the Arab savants likewise applied themselves to these studies."

Indeed, it could thus even be said that any and every development that emerged under Muslim rule occurred in spite of Islam!

Sincerely
A [Keen] Student of Islam


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title By Date

A IS FOR ALLAH BY YUSUF ISLAM (CAT STEVENS) THE BRITISH AYATOLLAH SINGER THE SEARCH FOR MODERATE ISLAM OR...... [137 words]

TIRDAD GHARIB Jul 14, 2008 14:13

  NO DIALOGUE SHOULD BE BETWEEN TEHRAN IRAN AND WASHINGTON DC USA, [121 words]

TIRDAD GHARIB Jul 20, 2008 09:30

Is islamism really different from islam?
[w/response by Daniel Pipes] [178 words]

François Eiffel/FFL Nov 1, 2007 07:41

The Muslims Need a Scapegoat [878 words]

Ibrahim Abdul Mu'min May 25, 2005 11:21

  Ibrahim Abdul Mumin [34 words]

P.O.D. Dec 10, 2005 12:02

Moderate Islam? [77 words]

Clifford Ishii May 19, 2005 00:26

  Islam: "Religion of Peace" [28 words]

Avraham David Jan 20, 2006 14:45

slam - when politics enter ... [264 words]

Muhammad Arshad May 3, 2005 06:07

I need more convincing [460 words]

Kevin Graham Mar 31, 2005 07:55

Moderate Islam: A Pipe Dream! [3744 words]

A (Keen) Student of Islam Feb 26, 2005 00:01

  ⇒ Moderate Islam: A Pipe Dream! [1235 words]

A (Keen) Student of Islam Mar 1, 2005 03:32

  Kudos to comment by "A ( Keen) Student of Islam" [132 words]

Jaladhi Mar 1, 2005 10:28

  Response to commenter "A (keen) Student of Islam" [147 words]

Bob Mar 26, 2005 17:03

  Response to Bob's Comment [526 words]

A (Keen) Student of Islam Apr 3, 2005 15:50

  A little proselytising for (keen) [118 words]

Vic Coffey May 18, 2005 10:22

  A little proselytising for (keen) [287 words]

A (Keen) Student of Islam Jun 2, 2005 05:08

  studied in the desert: moderate Islam is Islam [201 words]

studied in the middle of the Arabian desert Mar 26, 2007 13:02

A Reply to Auster [166 words]

Lowell Byrd Feb 18, 2005 05:16

I have weighed in favor of Lawrence Auster [219 words]

David S. Jacob Feb 11, 2005 19:37

  a thorn in the side of humanity [314 words]

richard Feb 4, 2006 23:40

moderate submission to Satan? [293 words]

Bob Boynton Feb 9, 2005 17:00

Mr. Auster is right [138 words]

Jaladhi Feb 8, 2005 15:36

The nature of Islam [59 words]

Gloria Stewart Feb 7, 2005 15:25

Moderate Islam v Political Islam [264 words]

Karim Mansoor Feb 7, 2005 10:38

  Response to commenter Karim Mansoor [86 words]

Peter J. Herz Feb 10, 2005 14:49

A take at Mr. Auster's response [328 words]

Alain Jean-Mairet Feb 4, 2005 00:46

  Commenter Alain Jean-Mairet is not a civilizationalist [468 words]

Andrew Feb 5, 2005 02:02

  Response to Alain Jean-Mairet [339 words]

Lawrence Auster Feb 5, 2005 20:08

  I do not want to appease. [292 words]

Alain Jean-Mairet Feb 6, 2005 02:52

  Alain Jean-Mairet's self-defeating reasoning [191 words]

Lawrence Auster Feb 9, 2005 11:46

  Auster's only half smart reasoning [154 words]

Alain Jean-Mairet Feb 10, 2005 14:48

  Prediction = January 2006 [229 words]

JAMES A HAUER Jan 22, 2006 05:57

  you will know a tree (pearl) by it's fruits. [26 words]

Richard Feb 4, 2006 22:22

Well, I'll tellya... [92 words]

Stanley Levin Feb 3, 2005 14:50

Obscurantist Islam cannot change [229 words]

R.K. Ohri Feb 3, 2005 11:37

Reply to L. Auster strikes me as utterly inconsistent with his usual manner
[w/response by Daniel Pipes] [300 words]

Phil Stan Feb 3, 2005 09:12

A most helpful clarification [166 words]

Roger WT Wilkinson Feb 2, 2005 23:36

False Hope [309 words]

Jaladhi Feb 1, 2005 11:05

I'm not so confident, sorry [303 words]

Olivia M. Feb 1, 2005 01:46

My reply to Daniel Pipes's reply [1727 words]

Lawrence Auster Jan 31, 2005 21:49

  Comments on Auster's reply to Pipes's reply to Auster [597 words]

bucephalus Feb 10, 2005 00:23

  Jews Living in Christendom...Why Would They Want To? [91 words]

Bliss Jul 18, 2006 12:05

Both Mr. Pipes and Mr. Auster are right to an extent [582 words]

Quennel Gale Jan 31, 2005 16:53

What is moderate Islam? [1149 words]

LK Jan 31, 2005 03:15

  Question for LK [130 words]

IPH Feb 5, 2005 15:44

Comments on Auster and Pipes Debate [466 words]

K Ibrahim Jan 30, 2005 22:48

Lawrence Auster: "The Search for Moderate Islam" [140 words]

A former muslim Jan 30, 2005 22:33

Only one solution to a Peaceful Islam [6 words]

Paul Rinderle Jan 30, 2005 19:22

Lawrence Auster, Daniel Pipes and Islamophobia [148 words]

Octavio Johanson Jan 30, 2005 17:32

The french psychoanalytical connection [284 words]

Peter van Summeren Jan 30, 2005 16:07

Fish in water [69 words]

Gabriel Toking Jan 30, 2005 06:36

Pipes vs. Auster [322 words]

Richard Bowers Jan 30, 2005 00:13

Let's face reality, please. [324 words]

Jason Pappas Jan 29, 2005 21:23

Lawrence Auster is right [122 words]

F.Shawki Jan 29, 2005 20:24

Was Mohammed a Jihadi? [187 words]

Benjamin Jan 29, 2005 19:40

Response to Pipes vs. Auster Commentary [128 words]

Shari Seaman Goodman Jan 29, 2005 18:54

Lawrence Auster's analysis is superficial [201 words]

Octavio Johanson Jan 29, 2005 18:09

Moderate Islam does exist (there are some moderates) [167 words]

Steve Klein Jan 29, 2005 14:02

RESPECT & FEAR [439 words]

Marcos Berenstein Jan 29, 2005 09:16

The 800 pound Gorillia cannot be contained by "Moderate" Islam [1167 words]

Andrew Jan 29, 2005 06:54

Modern vs. Historical Islam [254 words]

John Randall Peacher Jan 29, 2005 03:53

Auster is right [290 words]

Caesar M. Arevalo Jan 29, 2005 00:17

  Arbitration [279 words]

Alain Jean-Mairet Jan 31, 2005 00:58

Moderate Islam Does Exist [83 words]

Mustafa Akyol Jan 28, 2005 23:08

  Response to Mustafa Akyol [211 words]

John Jan 29, 2005 13:34

ABU MUSAB AL-ZARQAWI'S LOATHSOME LEGACY [218 words]

CITIZEN Jan 28, 2005 23:05

Agree to Disagree [53 words]

John Jan 28, 2005 22:51

Moderate Islam is an oxymoron [137 words]

Hari Iyer Jan 28, 2005 22:47

ISLAMIC DEEDS & RHETORIC [343 words]

CITIZEN Jan 28, 2005 20:33

PEACE? [223 words]

LES DAVIS Jan 28, 2005 18:41

Pipes vs Auster = Winning vs Losing [119 words]

Octavio Johanson Jan 28, 2005 18:24

What about women in Islam?
[w/response by Daniel Pipes] [287 words]

Susan Chapman Jan 28, 2005 16:25

The Big Question [119 words]

Darwin Barrett Jan 28, 2005 16:10

Parallel with Samuel Huntington's "The Clash of Civilizations" [83 words]

Peter Chew Jan 28, 2005 14:41

The strength of Radical Islam [379 words]

Germain Lucas Jan 28, 2005 13:39

Reality [311 words]

S Jan 28, 2005 13:23

Compassion vs Hatred [220 words]

John Jan 28, 2005 12:39

  Compassion and Hatred? Response to Commenter "John" [233 words]

Peter J. Herz Jan 31, 2005 21:43

  Is it feasible? [170 words]

John Feb 2, 2005 01:26

Moderate Islam?
[w/response by Daniel Pipes] [26 words]

Amy Eliezer Jan 28, 2005 12:11

No such thing as moderate Islam [75 words]

Kim Segar Jan 28, 2005 11:52

Truly Literate Responsive [103 words]

Jerrold E. Goldman Jan 28, 2005 11:44

Murder is murder [125 words]

Paul Rindertle Jan 28, 2005 11:26

Both of You Are Right [210 words]

David Smith Jan 28, 2005 11:17

Keep up the good work, Mr. Pipes [41 words]

Harley Cahen Jan 28, 2005 11:16

How about the UN meeting?
[w/response by Daniel Pipes] [150 words]

Simon Cohen Jan 28, 2005 10:58

A Reply to Lawrence Auster [66 words]

May Jan 28, 2005 10:51

The Goal [49 words]

Joseph Jan 28, 2005 10:38

Deeper knowledge of two "Good Books" leads in different directions [261 words]

D Patterson Jan 28, 2005 10:36

  Koranic Basis for Forgiveness? [38 words]

Wallace Liechty Jan 30, 2005 23:37

  D.Patterson's comment & Wallace Liechty's question [729 words]

A (Keen) Student of Islam Mar 2, 2005 12:16

Fecund Islam [211 words]

Steven Hess Jan 28, 2005 10:22

Refreshing yes, apologizing for Islam, no! [81 words]

Kenneth S. Besig Jan 28, 2005 09:48

Comment on [The Search for Moderate Islam:] A Reply to Lawrence Auster

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Mark my comment as a response to Moderate Islam: A Pipe Dream! by reader A (Keen) Student of Islam

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Click here to see the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS