69 million page views

Americans the British and the UN

Reader comment on item: Blame the UN's Power on George H.W. Bush
in response to reader comment: Disband this money sucking monstrosity

Submitted by Martin Horan (United Kingdom), May 31, 2012 at 08:31

Compared to us British, the Americans are relatively lucky when it comes to having been warned of the UN.

I have read many American writers over the years warning of what the UN were up to. In Britain a couple of writers are at last picking up. Unfortunately, our politicians do not want to know. They do not even want to know of the worries of the British people, most of whom want to come out of Europe.

Actually, Europe's leaders are hand in glove with the UN and though the majority of Brits want out of Europe many of them are ignorant of the dangers of the UN.

They do see the mess that becoming part of Europe has got(ten) us into and how it worsens daily. They don't like it so they want out. Our politicians think otherwise and will not stand up to Europe though they make countless promises to deal with Europe but do nothing. Americans are in the same situation with their politicians and their obsequious attitudes toward the UN.

As one of our few perceptive and much maligned journalists, Peter Hitchens, has stated: our politicians are professional liars. And they are. And so are those of the US.

The higher they are in power--in both our nations--the greater liars they are. They are so blatant about being liars that they do not even make the slightest attempt to hide the fact. We now have politicians who, when it comes to lying, make the Hitlers, Stalins, Maos, Arafats and Mahadinehads of the earth look like childish amateurs in comparison.

Because Americans and Britons till the 1960s lived in real democracies, we had freedoms Germans, Russians, Chinese and Arabs couldn't even dream of; so the latter were told what to believe--or else! And so, having no option, they swallowed the junk that created their paradigms. Whereas our politicians knew we had been raised to be more objective they had to be devious and conniving to deceive our peoples.

People in general are unaware of that. So they think, in despair, that it is as if American and British politicians have a collective blindfold over their eyes. More than likely, it is a Masonic hoodwink which has them unable to see what the rest of us can.

I can't speak for America but I know that our NWO British powers that be have been involved in Freemasonry since its inception in our land in the late eighteenth century. I know that because, although they do all their hocus-pocus behind closed doors, they make no bones (pun not intended) about being members of this secret fraternity. Churchill made no secret of his being a Mason and neither have certain members of our royal family or our aristocracy. In fact, they have vaunted their memberships.

Masonry--as their own top "philosophers" such as Albert Pike and Manley P. Hall have written and "prophesied"--hopes to bring about a New World Order. And remember that those Masonic writers were writing in the early twentieth century! And it is interesting that back then they were advocating a neo-Nazi, pro-pagan One World. Interesting when you read these writers that they have two things in common with Hitler, Stalin and Islam: anti-Semitism and anti-Christianity.

But, as I started out saying, you Americans are luckier than we British, because at least you have had writers warning about this (what none dare call) conspiracy against our peoples for decades.

I am re-reading Constance Cumbey's The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow and am astonished to find that it was first published in 1987. So you Americans have had plenty of warning. She saw all this coming back then. And she wasn't alone.

You have perceptive writers like Dave Hunt, Gary Kay, Grant Jeffries, Dr Stanley Monteith, Mark Hitchcock, and many more, who have been speaking out against the UN and the NWO for a long time. However, like us Brits, you have a media which is largely at war with Judeo-Christian ethics and wish to promote every other synthesist belief.

Only a couple of decades ago we called these paradigms "alternative lifestyles". Now these so-called philosophies and lifestyles--though still vociferously vaunted by minorities--are promoted by the media as if they are the majority. There is a war being waged by the Western media against it peoples. One has only to look the the cartoon comedy The Simpsons to see the blatant attempts at brainwashing young people through humour.

All the decent people in this comedy are homosexuals, or ethnic and all the baddies are white males. The father and son are virtual morons and the mother, though not very intelligent, is a decent human being while the most intelligent of the characters is the young daughter. All of her views are left of centre and globalist.

Can you imagine if all the decent people in any kind of TV show were portrayed as heterosexual and all the baddies portrayed as homosexual and/or ethnic? Can you imagine if the mother and daughter of the main family were morons, the father docile but a decent human being while his son is portrayed the most intelligent with conservative and un-politically correct views?

Let's fact it, it is never going to happen. It would never be allowed. That is how our media brainwashes. And the powers that be in the US and the UN love it.

Is it too late for America and Britain to return to what we once were?

Yes it is! The powers that be in both our nations have seen to that. That's because they think differently from most of us. They want their NWO with the rest of us worshiping at their feet and especially at the feet of their chosen vessel to rule. Obama is merely the precursor to the one world ruler. He is just a convenient mouthpiece. It astonished me from the start that so many Americans could not see how shallow that man was and still is.

May God bless America, but I think it is to late. Like Britain, you have turned away from Him, as we have, by turning against Israel--the only democracy in the Middle East. You are now reaping the curses for it as we in Britain have been for our pro-Arab stance. In the 1960s we boasted we had an empire on which the sun never set. Now we are a fifty-fifth rate nation that is in hock to every other nation.

And what have we received for appeasement of Islam? Bombings and killings in our cities and utter contempt for our lifestyles by Moslems. It's a fact.

What did America get for forcing Israel to release implacable psychopaths from jail, including the one Israel did not want to release because of his bloody atrocities (Mohammad Atta)? Atta thanked them by flying the first of the planes that smashed into the two towers. And both the US and British media did their best to keep that silent. Thankfully a couple of Christian journalists exposed that fact.

Genesis 12:2-3 warns us that if we bless Israel we will be blessed and if we curse them we shall be cursed. The Apostle Paul warns us in Romans 11 that we better not even dare speak against the Jews because they are still special in God's sight.

Yet we have epicopalian bishops and other liberal so-called Christians--who dare to flout what God warns us of. They are enemies of God and claim to speak for him. Well, not only some of the above American authors have warned of his so does the Bible. It also says that we reap what we sow. Both Britain and America have sown the wind and now we reap the whirlwind.

There's only one thing that can stop it. That's to stop eating of the fruit of the tree of good and evil--thinking that we can make our own moralities (such as Masonry or any other human "philosophy") and go back to the Book that made our nations great--and to live by it.

But that's not going to happen. We've gone too far from it.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (31) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
revolutions have nothing to do with democracy [235 words]calhouniteApr 10, 2012 10:11195050
Disband this money sucking monstrosity [104 words]danariFeb 23, 2012 00:42193574
Americans the British and the UN [1349 words]Martin HoranMay 31, 2012 08:31193574
The toothless U.N. [68 words]saraFeb 14, 2012 18:53193374
8Democracies and their undemocratic allies [524 words]IanusFeb 13, 2012 18:38193356
American Democracy Can No Longer Be Exported - Cannot Export What One Does Not Have [561 words]M. ToveyFeb 16, 2012 14:30193356
3When you can't export democracy because you don't have it,then you export what you have, e.g. oligarchy or Wahhabism [519 words]IanusFeb 17, 2012 16:07193356
A Rebuttal [394 words]Pied PiperFeb 25, 2012 18:00193356
2A rebuttal of the rebuttal [1095 words]IanusFeb 25, 2012 19:48193356
The Battle of the Rebuttals [519 words]Pied PiperMar 3, 2012 16:43193356
2How many witches have been recently beheaded in the US ? [551 words]IanusMar 4, 2012 06:44193356
Ibi Erit Fletus et Stridor Dentium [135 words]Pied PiperMar 6, 2012 12:53193356
2Malleus maleficarum Arabicus [646 words]IanusMar 6, 2012 23:14193356
Cutting One's Teeth on Biblical Translations [208 words]M. ToveyMar 8, 2012 17:36193356
Ego Sum Princeps Arabicus et Super Grammaticam [191 words]Pied PiperMar 11, 2012 16:05193356
So - Not in Latin Then [681 words]M. ToveyMar 12, 2012 19:09193356
1Manipulating the U. N. is Unconstitutional [886 words]M. ToveyFeb 13, 2012 12:03193351
Thanks for source of UN power and Question [105 words]Dr Bryan PoulinFeb 10, 2012 14:05193278
2We cannot put Sanctity of All Lives on the back burner in the U.N. [65 words]Michael Hanni MorcosFeb 11, 2012 23:14193278
Toothless [316 words]AEBFeb 10, 2012 14:04193277
permanent organizations and UN authority [127 words]mythFeb 9, 2012 12:56193251
4Won't "an organization of only democratically-elected governments" be the accuser,the judge and the executioner in one person? [568 words]IanusFeb 9, 2012 11:42193248
Follow that Light [40 words]Jay1Feb 8, 2012 19:58193228
That Light? It Needs to be Relit First. [370 words]M. ToveyFeb 9, 2012 18:52193228
2The UN a shameful organization [495 words]NuritGFeb 8, 2012 16:43193219
Hey UN.Go away already. [94 words]batya daganFeb 8, 2012 16:39193218
Worthless Trash= The U.N. [8 words]Sandra DeeOct 24, 2014 11:25193218
A man can always turn around if he finds he's gone in the wrong direction. [1 words]Abu NudnikFeb 8, 2012 11:18193202
UN power goals [105 words]lily flacksFeb 8, 2012 05:30193193
2How many times did George H W Bush utter the phrase 'new world order'? Too many, but few had a clue.... [39 words]Adina Kutnicki, IsraelFeb 8, 2012 05:25193192
an observation [293 words]Peter HerzFeb 18, 2012 22:44193192

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Americans the British and the UN by Martin Horan

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)