69 million page views

Chicken Little logical arguments on internment

Reader comment on item: Why the Japanese Internment Still Matters

Submitted by Ted Kay (United States), Jan 7, 2005 at 09:35

Here is a very good logical analysis of the internment issue from Dan Koffler. He probably disagrees with me that profiling is now necessary and legal, and he would also probably disagree with my proposition that "iff" (if and only if) it was discovered that Muslim men in multiple American cities were stockpiling weapons, ammunition, making bombs, communicating between groups, AND said communication involved a plot to initiate an assault (not necessarily a specific target), then the US government would have the right to inter all Muslim men associated with (not just a pizza delivery dude) each group in those specific cities, which would include social interaction that may not involve specific organization and communication with the plot. Length of internment and post internment monitoring for nonconvicted individuals would have to be debated.

We cannot have another repeat of the government surrounding and/or attacking a place like Mt. Carmel in Waco because of legal weapons purchases yet bogus child molestation charges (or terrorist charges) and in doing so killing 20 or so young children and other innocent adults. I say this because what is needed is weapons collection + proven intent to organize some type of attack or assault. Koresh was minding his own business and in his own warped theology, wanted "protection" against parts of the government that he considered evil.

Start Koffler:
I'm going to prove that Malkin does indeed offer justification for the internment of all Muslim-Americans, and then I'll take into consideration what's really going on with her avowed stance against such internment. All the premises are either provided by Malkin, are non-controversial matters of fact, or are inferential statements that very few people would find contentious and that Malkin, certainly, could only reject on pain of contradiction.

I'll present the argument formally; it has two lemmas (minor conclusions), A6 and B10, and one major conclusion, C:

A1: In the late 1930s and early 1940s, Japanese-Americans and Japanese aliens residing in the United States constituted a certain level of risk, R1, to US national security.
A2: In wartime, extraordinary measures are morally justified in order to protect the nation's security.
A3: The nation's wartime leaders, with access to credible intelligence concerning the nature of R1, concluded that R1 was sufficiently high to necessitate extraordinary security measures being taken against Japanese aliens and citizens of Japanese descent as well.
A4: The particular measure taken, the internment of the Japanese population of the west coast of the United States, was morally justified on national security grounds.
A5: If any resident sub-population P, in time of war, constitutes a threat level greater than or equal to R1, then the government would be morally justified in take the same measure R1 against P.
A6: Therefore, in wartime the government would be morally justified in interning any resident sub-population that constituted a threat to national security greater than or equal to the threat posed by the Japanese and Japanese-American sub-population during World War II.

B1: The United States is at war in 2004.
B2: One of the primary (or at least best-known) tactics of the United States' enemies is to infiltrate Western nations and create furtive terrorist cells within them.
B3: The membership of such cells is overwhelmingly (very close to if not exactly 100%) Muslim.
B4: "Sleeper" cells have been uncovered all over Europe, and the men who hijacked the planes on Sept. 11, 2001, were operating out of such a cell.
B5: There is a discrete, non-zero probability, likely greater than .5, that sleeper cells are operating out of the United States right now.
B6: The aims of such cells are far more directly violent and injurious to Americans than the espionage that could potentially have been conducted by Japanese citizens and residents during WWII.
B7: The proportion of Japanese citizens and residents who could credibly have been suspected of endangering national security during WWII was very small relative to the entire sub-population.
B8: The proportion of Muslim citizens and residents who could credibly be suspected of endangering national security in this war is, similarly, very small relative to the entire sub-population.
B9: The conjunction of B6, B7, and B8 entails that the threat to national security posed by Muslim citizens and residents in 2004 is certainly no less than and in all likelihood greater than the threat posed by Japanese citizens and residents in 1942.
B10: Therefore the risk level, R2, constituted by the resident Muslim sub-population in 2004, is greater than or equal to R1.

C: Therefore the government would be morally justified in interning the sub-population of Muslim-American citizens and Muslim resident aliens.

Very few of these premises should seem contentious. In fact, there are only two, A3 and A4, that I think are false, and one more A2, that I think is true as long as it is not interpreted overly broadly (and that means some significant constraints). Of these, A4 is the major argument of Malkin's book, and A3 is an ancillary argument she offers in support of A4 (I think Eric Muller and Greg Robinson have sufficiently discredited Malkin's "scholarship" already).

If Malkin wants to deny the conclusion, C, then she has to find another proposition to reject. None of the B propositions (except maybe B1) are very good candidates; they are just a realistic, historically contextualized assessment of the potential threat posed by covert enemy agents inside the United States. If Malkin were to argue that we're not at war now (~B1), then there could be no inference made on the basis of A2, and thus she would not be committed to C. But I doubt, somehow, that Malkin would say that we're not at war now.

Malkin's statements that she is not calling for a round-up of Muslims therefore look like a flat rejection of A5, the conditional premise that says that what's morally justified in the case of one particular threat would be morally justified in the case of an equally severe or greater threat. And that, dear friends, is a move she's not entitled to make. She might offer non-moral reasons for not resorting to the same measures in a later case that were used in an earlier one, but she most certainly is in no position to argue against the moral justification of such measures in the later case. (Note that the foregoing argument is completely neutral about what moral system is in play. It will be valid for any coherent set of moral principles.)

So Malkin is committing herself to having no moral objection to the internment of Muslim citizens and residents. Hasn't she already given up the game? And if the government were to start rounding up Muslims, how, exactly, would she argue against doing so?

UPDATE: In the comments section, I responded to "cpl" asking, in effect, what's so bad about a non-moral case for opposing the internment of Muslims. My condensed answer is that it does Malkin and us no good to argue that it wouldn't be wrong per se, but merely non-efficacious, to intern our Muslim neighbors. Put it this way: I don't want the sanctity of my civil rights or those of any of my friends to be contingent on Michelle Malkin's calculations of what is and what isn't strategically efficacious.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (188) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
3Keep your hopes low with Tarique Ghaffur [290 words]PrashantJun 23, 2018 13:22243409
187% of the French are right [300 words]PrashantJun 23, 2018 12:51243408
Israel recently stripped Israeli citizens who have joined Isis of their citizenship [23 words]AnonSep 4, 2017 10:16240708
Unfair accusations of fascism [249 words]Moderate PragmatistNov 17, 2016 11:41234121
Eagle Eye [22 words]Savian JimenezApr 2, 2015 12:03222601
Of course [7 words]Landon Van BurenMar 26, 2015 12:12222496
3All attempts to justify it run into a simple fact... [77 words]CalebMay 9, 2010 07:50172462
Martial Law in Hawaii and the Niihau incident [156 words]Henry JenkinsMay 6, 2011 05:36172462
Thank you Henry for strengthening my Argument [166 words]CalebMay 9, 2011 02:55172462
CALEB: AS TO INTERNMENT OF JAPANESE 'FROM HAWAII [584 words]LEE BRANCHAug 8, 2014 13:41172462
3Japanese "relocation", not internment. [1010 words]Wallace Edward BrandApr 17, 2009 16:43154023
4Once again, the Right is wrong. [96 words]High School DiplomaMar 6, 2010 06:37154023
Once again the politically correct are wrong [278 words]Wallace Edward BrandOct 8, 2011 15:02154023
Not racism [159 words]Howard FreemanDec 23, 2008 15:20145745
2WHY THE JAPANESE INTERMENT STILL MATTERS [278 words]Elizabeth van KampenMar 24, 2008 11:09123493
Agree with Bryan Lee [249 words]C.G. AtkinsDec 8, 2007 20:32115933
reply to c.g. Atkins [66 words]howard fremanJan 31, 2009 14:34115933
3Well I've read MAGIC [103 words]Brian D GrayJul 26, 2010 20:31115933
dual citizenship [89 words]hbearDec 15, 2006 14:2069626
1Well... [56 words]Brian D. GrayJul 26, 2010 20:3469626
1Comment [240 words]Bryan LeeDec 11, 2005 23:0229786
1They're not the "other" [337 words]TashaNov 26, 2005 18:2828875
The others.... [106 words]Angel B.Nov 7, 2006 19:3028875
2In Response to Olsen .... [423 words]EmilyNov 18, 2005 01:5428569
purpose of internment [262 words]TAPOct 7, 2005 23:2226701
OGEC [574 words]Edward F. ThieryOct 7, 2005 18:0026687
Japanese Internment [92 words]K. JarvisSep 2, 2005 18:5625427
3against internment [154 words]AnthonyAug 24, 2005 18:5925076
1Response to Barbara Hoshiko [110 words]Farida FaiziJun 6, 2005 12:1522578
1Need more specificity [229 words]KonradMar 30, 2005 10:2521244
2This is how hate starts: response to "Andrew" [220 words]JackieMar 11, 2005 14:3020957
According to the Islamists, Islam is not a peaceful religion. [555 words]Wallace Edward BrandMay 29, 2007 22:4220957
Oh please.... [144 words]donvanMay 30, 2007 16:3620957
quote [92 words]ploomeApr 15, 2009 11:2620957
This is a response to a question from "ploome" on the source of my information on Thomas Jefferson and "Adja" [105 words]Wallace Edward BrandApr 15, 2009 20:5020957
1Response to Malkin [204 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMar 1, 2005 22:3320607
Reply to commenter Andrew [77 words]David JonesFeb 21, 2005 22:3220452
Interpreting the Koran [123 words]Wallace Edward BrandOct 8, 2011 14:1620452
1How new is this idea ? [254 words]John J. DonneFeb 8, 2005 06:3220155
D. Pipes misquoted by columnist in San Antonio, Texas Express News [87 words]Sylvia WeissJan 30, 2005 14:4119994
1Militant Islam in the US hails the death of respect for human life and how it is impacting on America. [224 words]AndrewJan 25, 2005 21:4219871
andrew - wrong info and irrelevant conclusions: LIES! [171 words]PeaceMakerFeb 14, 2007 00:3619871
Reply to PeaceMaker [131 words]Wallace Edward BrandOct 8, 2011 14:2719871
Response to internee re: Malkin book [201 words]Armond FestineJan 20, 2005 14:3319791
The whole story [50 words]Walter E. WallisJan 19, 2005 16:4119777
These are the SDS of the 60's [35 words]ErnieJan 19, 2005 11:5519770
Profiling - limitations [62 words]Michael C [uk]Jan 18, 2005 15:5219746
Response to Barbara Hoshiko [125 words]Philip SchlesingerJan 17, 2005 14:2219712
Jihad by Stealth [290 words]Wallace Edward BrandOct 8, 2011 15:2319712
Harder but Fairer [117 words]RyanJan 17, 2005 04:4419710
2Humanity, YOU FAIL. [654 words]AkioJan 15, 2005 03:4919677
1Profiling Rapists? [184 words]Greg BurginJan 13, 2005 21:0519659
1Internment for Americans? [272 words]BrandonJan 13, 2005 14:4519650
1Response to commenter Schlesinger [52 words]Barbara HoshikoJan 11, 2005 10:1019581
Response to Terry Holland [44 words]Philip SchlesingerJan 10, 2005 17:0619570
Response to Barbara Hoshiko [78 words]Philip SchlesingerJan 10, 2005 17:0219569
1A little foresight [140 words]Cindy GoodmanJan 10, 2005 16:2119567
1Difference between Japanese and fundamentalist Muslim immigrants [161 words]Barbara HoshikoJan 9, 2005 16:2019546
There's alot more you need to know about Islam [131 words]Jailani Bin SalehOct 13, 2006 21:4819546
Ms Hoshiko Got it wrong [170 words]LT Sean ABDOct 19, 2006 07:2119546
response to Barbara Hoshiko [109 words]howard freemanJun 2, 2009 19:0519546
If this is a war then target the soldiers [276 words]Bradley WentworthJan 9, 2005 12:1919543
1Chicken Little logical arguments on internment [1187 words]Ted KayJan 7, 2005 09:3519500
Doesn't fly [274 words]Bonnie BoruckiJan 7, 2005 04:3819488
Defense of Islamist Internment [40 words]Paul R. MillerJan 6, 2005 10:4219452
More From an Internee [374 words]Edwin S. FujinakaJan 5, 2005 21:4019446
Fine Line Between Safety and Rights of the Individual [194 words]Marc ThompsonJan 5, 2005 20:5919444
1Internment - an objectively discredited canard [683 words]Gary R. WhiteJan 5, 2005 16:3419440
Lowman and McCloyMagic: The Untold Story of U.S. Intelligence and the Evacuation of Japanese Residents from the West Coast during WW IIwere correct. [198 words]Wallace Edward BrandMay 29, 2007 22:2519440
2No racism during Japanese internment? [154 words]MarkJan 5, 2005 16:2119438
7Internment Vs. 5th Amendment [106 words]A.M.Oct 30, 2008 17:3919438
Internment of American Citizens [365 words]Big DawgMar 6, 2011 03:2019438
Just A Thought [225 words]Terry R. HollandJan 5, 2005 12:0019433
Profiling [23 words]Richard BaldwinJan 5, 2005 11:2519431
1Supporting racial profiling but opposing internment [139 words]Jonathan RickJan 5, 2005 08:2319422
1Principles [49 words]TomJan 5, 2005 07:3119418
Why repeat a mistake [224 words]CraigJan 5, 2005 06:1719416
1Saudi Arabia's misplaced priorities [67 words]Hari IyerJan 5, 2005 01:5019408
This article should be required reading! [207 words]Diana WhittJan 5, 2005 00:2619404
2In defense of the Constitution [252 words]Mollie BrewsaughJan 4, 2005 22:2919402
Beyond belief [36 words]DonJan 4, 2005 22:1019400
Dangerous [223 words]AmiraJan 4, 2005 21:4119399
Good Grief [30 words]Larry ThorpJan 4, 2005 21:3419398
Be careful of some opposers [248 words]Amiris ReynosoJan 4, 2005 21:0819396
1My voice [184 words]Sandra AndersonJan 4, 2005 21:0119395
My Opinion [40 words]Betty KarnesJan 4, 2005 19:0019389
Profiling [399 words]Steve in BostonJan 4, 2005 16:4519379
Prisons [147 words]Bianca MittagJan 4, 2005 16:3519376
Totally Agree with Mr. Pipes [116 words]Jo MinogueJan 4, 2005 16:3419375
1National disgrace [120 words]TonyJan 4, 2005 16:3119374
Internment Was Correct [237 words]TantorJan 4, 2005 13:0519355
Can we discuss this matter today? [73 words]Jason PappasJan 3, 2005 13:3419331
The "Timothy McVeigh" comment [83 words]ReportJan 3, 2005 12:1519326
1Islam VS US Constitution [279 words]Hari IyerJan 2, 2005 22:1319320
Islam vs. the U.S.Constitution [143 words]Faultline USADec 26, 2007 13:1819320
3JAPANESE RELOCATION MYTH BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA [567 words]CAPT James M. OlsenJan 2, 2005 19:5719316
2outraged [284 words]StudentFeb 25, 2007 17:5419316
3We can't take much more of this, CAPTAIN! [213 words]Brendan O'LearyMar 8, 2007 22:1519316
I salute Captain James M. Olsen [382 words]Robert MedleyAug 14, 2007 20:0019316
2thank goodness [125 words]Brendan O'LearyAug 16, 2007 00:2119316
2WAY TO BE [14 words]Brendan O'LearyAug 16, 2007 00:2519316
2No justification [55 words]DerekJul 8, 2010 20:0819316
Citizenship vs Race [384 words]Harvey JenkinsMay 6, 2011 05:0919316
myth [108 words]howard freemanMay 30, 2015 17:5819316
become what we are fighting [38 words]Pogue MahoneDec 11, 2016 00:1419316
Mr. Pipes is right [540 words]W.J.HopwoodJan 2, 2005 15:0919307
Pipes and Malkin are correct. [1995 words]BobJan 2, 2005 13:2219303
2Timothy McVeigh [115 words]Jon YorkJan 1, 2005 16:4019290
2Missing the point... [59 words]AaronJan 1, 2005 16:2119288
1Common Sense [44 words]Mike BochnerJan 1, 2005 11:5819285
1The Japanese Internment [191 words]RickJan 1, 2005 11:3519284
I disagree w/ Pipes and response to Irfan's "I don't buy this" comment [249 words]JohnDec 31, 2004 18:2019278
Dismay and Shock [63 words]Professor Judy SaltzmanDec 31, 2004 15:4819275
2Be careful about profiling Mr. Pipes [357 words]B. AlotaibiDec 31, 2004 14:0019273
How about the White Guys? [48 words]BillDec 31, 2004 12:4619272
Slippery slope [37 words]Paul FDec 31, 2004 12:3019271
1Is that what they mean by freedom? [194 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Stuart DryerDec 31, 2004 11:5519269
Thanks for the German version: it reads better that way! [4 words]DaveDec 31, 2004 11:1519267
Common sense [55 words]Octavio JohansonDec 31, 2004 08:2019266
Malkin on German-and Italian-Americans [143 words]Michelle MalkinDec 31, 2004 03:5319263
German & Italian Internment. [47 words]Tom DundeeJun 3, 2009 22:3519263
Registering members of religious groups [158 words]Lou LilienthalDec 30, 2004 22:3219260
I was in high school at that point in time [150 words]L Andrea CoccoDec 30, 2004 20:4719259
Japanese relocation [1411 words]Bill LearyDec 30, 2004 14:0219248
Read the Constitution! [85 words]UVDec 30, 2004 12:5819246
What really happened [275 words]A. Mark Ratner, PhD, PEDec 30, 2004 12:5719245
1Additional Comments from an Actual Internee [340 words]Edwin S. FujinakaDec 30, 2004 03:0319238
Not all of the French are blind [40 words]CAMELIADec 29, 2004 21:5419228
Japanese Internment Did Not Serve the Allied Cause [480 words]Aaron GoldsteinDec 29, 2004 21:1219225
I don't buy this [442 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Irfan KhawajaDec 29, 2004 19:3119224
Actually, Germans were interned as well as Japanese [289 words]S. O'HaraDec 29, 2004 19:2119223
1Ninth Circle of Hell - Profiling and Discernment [1084 words]Diane AldenDec 29, 2004 15:1119217
Minority Hijackers [122 words]Darwin BarrettDec 29, 2004 14:3219214
Profiling [49 words]L.D. ForeDec 29, 2004 12:3719212
Those who follow TV News are best informed? [153 words]David RedmondDec 29, 2004 12:3519211
An Internee Comments [369 words]Edwin S. FujinakaDec 29, 2004 12:3119210
"Why the Japanese Internment Still Matters" [214 words]Achilles PerryDec 29, 2004 11:0019209
1What about German Americans in the US at the time? [132 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ruben PerlmutterDec 29, 2004 10:5919208
Error [275 words]Bruce LedermanDec 29, 2004 09:5119206
Germans too? [163 words]Garry PriorDec 29, 2004 09:3319205
Germans and Italians and other were Interned [71 words]Harvey JenkinsMay 6, 2011 04:4219205
1I strongly disagree! [102 words]Richard Houlihan.Dec 29, 2004 09:2519204
Malkin [22 words]S.C.PandaDec 29, 2004 05:0319202
As usual, your brilliant remarks... [242 words]Freda FloodDec 29, 2004 03:0019199
Japanese internment [46 words]Lubicz, StephaneDec 29, 2004 00:5719198
Malkin and Christian Arabs [109 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Robin R KentDec 28, 2004 23:5319197
Why not close the door? [66 words]Brenda WalkerDec 28, 2004 23:4919196
The danger of any fundamentalist faith today [318 words]Andria SpindelDec 28, 2004 23:1219195
A big difference looking back in retrospect [187 words]Joe MittelmanDec 28, 2004 22:2019193
Defintional challenge [107 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
BujevacDec 28, 2004 22:1019192
Internment Was Warrented Then and Surveillance is Necessary Now! [61 words]Dr. Phil CorsonDec 28, 2004 21:3519191
History can teach so let it [160 words]Kathryn McguireApr 25, 2007 16:4119191
But was it truly necessary? [248 words]Peter J. HerzDec 28, 2004 20:2819190
In War, Hard Facts Must Trump Ignorant Sloganeering [382 words]Patrick L. MooreDec 28, 2004 19:5919189
Start with potential immigrants [129 words]PatDec 28, 2004 19:4019188
Thank You, Voices of Reason [235 words]TimDec 28, 2004 19:0319187
Selecting the bad guys [70 words]JimDec 28, 2004 19:0319186
Irrefutable logic once again! [75 words]Leo H. GawroniakDec 28, 2004 18:0819185
Unacceptable [94 words]Philip SchlesingerDec 28, 2004 17:4119184
Unarguable premise is arguable [45 words]Lawrence GoldbergDec 28, 2004 17:2719183
Japanese Internment is Racially Motivated Unless... [116 words]Stanley L. AlekmanDec 28, 2004 17:0719181
WWII & beyond:U.S. at risk [229 words]Marcos BerensteinDec 28, 2004 16:4219180
The more people follow TV news... [101 words]Tom TimmonsDec 28, 2004 16:2219178
Manipulated by the Left [151 words]JohnDec 28, 2004 15:0819175
This WWII vet agrees [27 words]Sol KatzDec 28, 2004 14:2619173
1Japanese American Heros [112 words]Robert AbramsDec 28, 2004 14:2119172
1Name calling [77 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Alvin ZiontzDec 28, 2004 13:4119171
I totally disagree [185 words]Tzvi TamariDec 28, 2004 13:2719170
2A defense of mass internment? [136 words]Fred BinkleDec 28, 2004 13:0219169
Internment Camps in the Present Day [131 words]Jay LeavittDec 28, 2004 12:4219167
Thank you! Again you've hit just the right note. [257 words]John ClementsDec 28, 2004 11:1119164
National Security [37 words]Donald R. FoxDec 28, 2004 11:1019163
Racial issue? [169 words]Fred LapidesDec 28, 2004 10:5619162
I remember Pearl Harbor vividly... [142 words]Janyce JacobsDec 28, 2004 10:5119161
Guilty until proven innocent? [76 words]BSKDec 28, 2004 10:4219160
What about the rest of the Axis? [11 words]Sid PollackDec 28, 2004 10:3919159
PROFILING: where is the limit? [52 words]Ivor LissDec 28, 2004 10:1419157
My knee-jerk reaction [172 words]Burt DeFrenDec 28, 2004 10:0519156
2Who's Next? [173 words]Stephen BermanDec 28, 2004 09:5419155
Correct [166 words]Menahem DunskyDec 28, 2004 09:4819154
1Malkin's Hypocrisy [237 words]Dennis MiddlebrooksDec 28, 2004 09:2319153
Abraham [149 words]donvanMay 30, 2007 16:2319153
1No sympathies for fundamentalist Muslims [58 words]A. BahrupDec 28, 2004 09:1819152
2Profiling v internment [62 words]Mike WevrickDec 28, 2004 09:1019151
War in PC Times [68 words]Elizabeth Weber LevyDec 28, 2004 08:5619150
Why the Japanese Internment Still Matters [228 words]AndyDec 28, 2004 08:5319149
Beautifully stated [41 words]Dean KavourasDec 28, 2004 08:5019148
Interment [61 words]Harden ErvinDec 28, 2004 08:1219146

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)