69 million page views

Three children per family may be the tacit policy

Reader comment on item: Declining Muslim Birthrates in the West
in response to reader comment: Declining Muslim Rate in the West

Submitted by Prashant (United States), Feb 12, 2012 at 13:48

Dear Dr Pipes:

Your reader Sam from Canada suspects that Muslim families receive money from Saudi Arabia or some other sheikhdom to produce more children. I have no reason to believe that but from I have seen 'three children per family' may indeed be the tacit Islamic policy. Contrast that with the Chinese one child per family. Some one should cite evidence that three children per family is indeed a tacit policy.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (6) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1Declining Muslim Rate in the West [125 words]samFeb 11, 2012 16:46193295
Three children per family may be the tacit policy [72 words]PrashantFeb 12, 2012 13:48193295
3Alarming demography in U.K [63 words]Muslimk***Dec 27, 2010 07:10181287
reasonable observation [52 words]TamaraOct 16, 2012 17:59181287
it is a lie [106 words]eduardoDec 26, 2010 10:36181260
What about the Palestinians? [52 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
JoanneDec 25, 2010 01:16181238

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Three children per family may be the tacit policy by Prashant

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)