Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The Myth of Moderate Muslim
Reader comment on item: [American Muslim Group for Policy Planning;] Another "Moderate" Muslim Group

Submitted by Arlinda DeAngelis (United States), Dec 29, 2004 at 21:51

It all began for us one bright sunny morning when Islamic religious fanatics attacked the most prominent and populated cities in the United States killling three thousand people in a matter of a few hours.

Immediately following the horror, every Islamic organization inserted itself onto our airwaves proclaiming, in unison, "Islam is the religion of peace." "We condemn terrorism BUT America must examine its foreign policy." Then there were the cries of "We are being profiled and our civil rights are being abridged. We are targets of prejudice!" CAIR was everywhere from CNN to Fox News and every network evening news broadcast had a spokesman from CAIR. Over and over again we heard, "Islam is the religion of peace."

That the religion of peace preached and schooled its students in the madrassas both here in the United States and abroad to hate Americans and Jews, that the religion of peace used many of its charities to fund terrorism, that the religion of peace saw fit to enslave and debase half of its population, that the religion of peace saw fit to use its children as weapons of mass destruction notwithstanding.

Without sounding overly prejudiced, or hateful or even suspicious of the motives of a religion in which clerics call for its adherents to join the Jihad and its legitimate lobbying agencies to expound on the "religion of peace" franchise and as a eye witness to September 11th, I would not believe an Islamic cleric, CAIR, or any of their religous adherents if their tongues came certified and stamped with the peace symbol.

Perhaps when they stop using their children as suicide/homicide bombers, or when they liberate Arabic women from their stultifying disgraceful enslavement, or when their clerics formally and officially condemn any and all Jihad and/or they formally and officially recognize the existence of Israel I might begin to find Islam a credible belief system worthy of my tolerance.

But I've seen nothing that even remotely indicates that fundamentalist Islam and its organizations, and clerics and adherents are coming to terms with the modern world. The belief system is a burden and, if anyone here or abroad thinks that for even one nano second I would trust any of their organizations, even their reinvented ones, they'd better think again.

They defined themselves on September 11th as no other peoples before them except, perhaps, the Third Reich...

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (35) on this item

Title By Date
Ignorance is bliss [389 words]HK from EnglandNov 7, 2008 15:52
Misinformation everlasting problem [194 words]NNDec 29, 2005 12:06
What scares you so? [83 words]RoseDec 26, 2005 23:13
The fiction of there being moderate Muslims [182 words]historyofjihad.orgMar 15, 2005 07:13
Reply to Hajira [1255 words]HankMar 4, 2005 18:16
Islam & Humanism [391 words]Hari IyerJan 14, 2005 00:49
Islamic scholasticism [291 words]LKJan 12, 2005 02:37
WAHABBI ISLAM AND THE POOR IN AMERICA [264 words]Les DavisJan 11, 2005 13:28
Averroes' "The Incoherence of the Incoherence" -- A key to understanding the world today?
[w/response] [325 words]
GWKJan 5, 2005 11:01
Dispute of Averroes and Ghazali is it relevant in the modern world? [613 words]LKJan 10, 2005 02:19
Tahafut at-Tahafut [69 words]GWKJan 10, 2005 11:22
Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd [52 words]Peter JonesAug 10, 2007 08:51
Koran Calls Moderate Muslims "Hypocrites" [213 words]Don CastellaJan 4, 2005 21:33
Respose to commenter Don Castella [271 words]Nadeem ButtFeb 28, 2005 20:38
Hello Mr Pipes, You made it into the first page of a Pakistani Paper [100 words]Hari IyerJan 2, 2005 21:49
What about Sheikh Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi [137 words]Norman WandJan 1, 2005 20:13
The situation is probably even worse... [92 words]MikeDec 31, 2004 20:14
The word "moderate" is misleading [50 words]Octavio JohansonDec 31, 2004 08:16
Not all "Reviving the Islamic Spirit" attendees agreed with speakers... [378 words]Dave BrownDec 31, 2004 03:19
WHAT??! [61 words]LillianDec 29, 2005 18:57
geting the facts [66 words]saraFeb 24, 2006 14:58
nothing [56 words]jamieDec 25, 2006 21:13
Tareq Suwaidan [158 words]Aiesha AhmedDec 26, 2006 23:34
tarek suwaidan is a great scholar [69 words]amenaDec 27, 2006 18:36
Agreed [77 words]Shadee EMar 26, 2007 13:38
Types of Muslims [315 words]MollDec 30, 2004 18:05
They all the same [5 words]DanielSep 30, 2008 05:14
My humble opinion! [39 words]Avrum ApterDec 30, 2004 15:06
Communists and Islamists, a similar strategy [144 words]John YerkesDec 29, 2004 22:49
⇒ The Myth of Moderate Muslim [390 words]Arlinda DeAngelisDec 29, 2004 21:51
Response to Arlinda DeAngelis [11 words]Guy VitiJan 28, 2005 16:53
the Full story = the Full picture [567 words]Sherif ShafieSep 10, 2009 05:50
What is Moderation? [449 words]Peter J. HerzDec 29, 2004 18:59
All credit to Pipes [155 words]Abid JanDec 29, 2004 16:08
Beware of Wolves in Sheep's clothing [101 words]Darwin BarrettDec 29, 2004 14:47

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page