Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Mosques, Madrassas & Infamous Charities
Reader comment on item: [The Boim Trial:] Exploiting the Koran to Terrorize

Submitted by Arlinda DeAngelis (United States), Dec 14, 2004 at 19:48

One of the weapons used by some mosques, madrassas and those infamous charities is tax-exemption that is quite different from not-for-profit. The government doesn't care whether or not any organization decides to profit or not to profit. It's the tax-exempt status that is so valuable to all of these institutions.

Under the tax-exempt status, an organization must agree to act in the public interest, not to engage in hate and never to engage in politics. Tax exemption provides that the funding of these organizations may be deducted from the taxable income of the donor. In addition all taxes -- whether it be on the property, the building, the services and the goods these organizations buy -- are tax-free.

Now we all know there is no such thing as tax free. We the taxpayers assume payment for these organizations that act in the public interest. It is interesting to note that to donate to one of these infamous charities, or the hate purveying schools or the mosques for prayer and recruitment of terrorists is a tax deductible contribution. Imagine, giving the terrorists money to wage their murderous war and being able to deduct it from your taxes. How special is that

I hope from the bottom of my heart that they bankrupt these agencies but unlike the Klu Klux Klan and the Aryan Nation, these terrorist supporting insitutions get huge funds from the oil rich Middle East. It's a long, if not difficult and almost impossible, road towards bankrupting them. There's always the black gold of Saudi Arabia to fill the coffers of these slaughter houses.

Again Dr. Pipes hits the nail on the head when he suggests that in addition to the military war we fight in Iraq and at home under the Patriot Act, we need to wage the war against their money and their privileged tax-exempt status. It is a courageous stand for Dr. Pipes to take ... attacking the problem on all sides. Then again he is one of the ones unafraid of the status quo and those that hide behind the institutions that Americans hold so close to their hearts.

Dr. Pipes' idea is an idea whose time has come.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (36) on this item

Title By Date
And That's Only the Tip of the Iceberg [398 words]Louis McCartenJan 26, 2005 21:05
QLI is Quranic Literacy Institute [35 words]William KinneyJan 4, 2005 02:54
Case confirms a pattern... [52 words]Greg G.Dec 20, 2004 16:01
I salute Hon Arlander Keys [30 words]S.C.PandaDec 20, 2004 04:42
Palestinian education [239 words]Dave KabayDec 20, 2004 03:14
Basic principles in first world countries does not always make sens in Islamic/Arab culture Therefore we have to use the same tactics in order to eliminate terrorism [113 words]ZDec 18, 2004 19:54
Grateful [29 words]WalterDec 18, 2004 12:09
Good morning, America [18 words]Uri SpeelmanDec 18, 2004 11:36
It is time to re-think "human rights" [119 words]Octavio JohansonDec 18, 2004 09:33
Will this decision help eliminate separate "Islamic" society? [91 words]Romesh ChanderDec 17, 2004 12:53
PMU reactionary?
[w/response] [99 words]
BujevacDec 16, 2004 21:25
US constitution and Koran [50 words]N.N.Dec 16, 2004 11:23
NO! The Koran IS NOT Compatible with the U.S. Constitution [305 words]DillahMay 2, 2009 00:52
Repercussions of recent Boim court victory [85 words]RichardDec 16, 2004 06:44
Organizations that finance terrorists will never pay judgments. [307 words]gospelmidiDec 16, 2004 02:12
Make them irrelevant [117 words]Donald O.Dec 15, 2004 20:57
Islam in a Muslim country [152 words]Jolly OlieDec 15, 2004 13:15
Fundamentalist Islamists *USE*, not abuse Koran [164 words]Donald CastellaDec 15, 2004 12:46
MAS-ICNA Chicago convention... [59 words]Brian MelkunDec 15, 2004 12:31
Improvement :) [18 words]Iman DarwishNov 7, 2008 14:21
Some caution needed [379 words]Peter J. HerzDec 15, 2004 09:06
Exposed [162 words]MalvinaDec 15, 2004 04:45
The Saudis [123 words]Menahem DunskyDec 15, 2004 03:17
Progress - slow but steady [56 words]Robin Sue LandsburgDec 14, 2004 22:55
⇒ Mosques, Madrassas & Infamous Charities [359 words]Arlinda DeAngelisDec 14, 2004 19:48
Courts, Extremist Organizations and Philosophy [146 words]Ilona MelstradsDec 14, 2004 19:32
Congratulations, Judge Keys! [157 words]Marcos BerensteinDec 14, 2004 19:32
Being vigilant [49 words]Carol McLaughlinDec 14, 2004 18:38
The Common Denominator.... [109 words]Darwin BarrettDec 14, 2004 15:13
Getting their attention [60 words]Marcia PetersDec 14, 2004 14:09
I'm frightened by the increase in extremist Muslims in the U.S. [98 words]Shirley Kantor BehrDec 14, 2004 14:05
Exploiting the Koran to Terrorize [322 words]E.Dec 14, 2004 13:12
Global War on Islamic Terrorism [92 words]rsh1776Dec 14, 2004 11:44
Just like the KKK [111 words]Kenneth S. BesigDec 14, 2004 10:43
Another mis-use of courts [64 words]George SeaverDec 14, 2004 10:06
What took us so long? [77 words]Stephen BermanDec 14, 2004 09:58

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page