Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Bush's disastrous policies
Reader comment on item: In the Mideast, Bush dared to be different

Submitted by Enid Horowitz (United States), Oct 25, 2004 at 12:28

Yes, it's clear that Bush took radical approaches in his four year term. Instead of waging a strongly focused war on terrorism, he waged two insufficient wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. The war against Saddam Hussein has left his country in tatters. Iraqis are now the target of suicide bombers. Their infrastructure is broken, and they are struggling to exist from day to day because of the dangers of moving about, as well as electricity and food shortages. Is Iraq better today than it was prior to March 2003? No. More importantly, is America better off today than pre-9/11? No. Over 1.000 American boys are dead and no end is in sight.

Bush's domestic policies are disastrous, too. He has brought his right-wing Christian ideology into the White House. He governs by his "gut" and asks WWJD—What Would Jesus Do. As an American Jew, this frightens me. He's made it legal to give government funds to religious organizations that help the poor. While that has some merit, it bears strong oversight to be sure that these churches don't proselytize. As a former fund manager, I know many of them do.

Bush is the only president to move toward restricting our constitutional freedoms with respect to abortion rights and the USAPATRIOT Act. Abortion is another issue based on religion. Isn't it ironic that when JFK ran for president he had to ensure the country that he wouldn't bring religion into the White House, while today, since Bush, presidents seem to do the opposite. Is this good for the non-Christians in our country? No.

Abroad, Bush has alienated most of Western Europe. Not only do they detest us, but by association, they now really detest Israel. The lid is off the latent Jew-hatred. Anti-Semitism has risen dangerously all over Europe, not only because of the large numbers of Arabs living there, but also because of George Bush's unilateral war.

Both John Kerry and John Edwards have pledged to support Israel if elected, and I believe they can't possibly do any worse than Bush has done.

E. Horowitz

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (43) on this item

Title By Date
In the Mideast, Bush dared to be different
[w/response] [78 words]
habib, M.E.M.Jan 27, 2006 13:03
What a difference a label makes [155 words]Allen FinkelsteinDec 29, 2004 13:36
Too bad, they're just half measures. [253 words]PatOct 31, 2004 21:10
Double dare Bush to be really different [262 words]Cary LichtmanOct 28, 2004 17:12
Judenrein Palestinian state and the road map [55 words]elmer eisnerOct 26, 2004 00:13
Only on Paper [128 words]AvrahamOct 25, 2004 23:17
Correct choice [55 words]Patrick JamesOct 25, 2004 22:53
Terrorism requires Intelligence [176 words]John HalloffOct 25, 2004 20:10
Bush: Lesser of the 2 Evil Moderates [458 words]Rob JamesOct 25, 2004 18:13
The Underpinnings of Bush Ethics [116 words]JLOct 25, 2004 17:43
The entire debate is about to become moot. [167 words]Vernon RichardsOct 25, 2004 17:25
beware of islamists [40 words]MarkJan 27, 2008 12:09
The real purpose... [124 words]Steven BrewsterOct 25, 2004 17:24
What about the Saudi Arabia connection? [276 words]David HarariOct 25, 2004 16:50
Bush duplicity towards Israel cost many Israelis their lives [231 words]RonOct 25, 2004 15:48
Sitting in an arena of hate [367 words]Kenneth SikorskiOct 25, 2004 15:12
Bush? NO! [218 words]Avram KaliskyOct 25, 2004 14:51
Thanks, but no thanks [77 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiJun 9, 2008 00:30
Leap of Faith [330 words]dianeOct 25, 2004 14:01
Will A Palestinian State lead to Peace in the Mideast? [457 words]Rabbi Kalil S. RosenbergtOct 25, 2004 14:01
Bush is right But.... [131 words]Shahin ShadmerOct 25, 2004 13:46
I agree completely [25 words]Deek QuackenbushOct 25, 2004 13:45
This needs to be told! [97 words]Donna PaschalOct 25, 2004 13:03
Maligning Kerry [75 words]Stan FuttermanOct 25, 2004 12:44
⇒ Bush's disastrous policies [343 words]Enid HorowitzOct 25, 2004 12:28
Part of the story [99 words]J. AlexanderOct 25, 2004 11:12
Continuing roil over terrorism [143 words]Beau PritchardOct 25, 2004 11:10
Comments of an undecided moderate [104 words]Dan GendelOct 25, 2004 09:25
Bush X Kerry [150 words]Marcos BerensteinOct 25, 2004 08:03
Bush the moderate [95 words]Rob JamesOct 25, 2004 04:30
Bush and the Middle East [102 words]Elisha GalonOct 25, 2004 03:17
Bush: Is it Really a War? [255 words]Dan RusenOct 25, 2004 03:07
I agree but... [279 words]Shlomo ben Avraham PinheroOct 24, 2004 23:53
Bush's Middle Eastern policy [19 words]Daniel K. BregmanOct 24, 2004 23:19
Excellent [87 words]Margaret YoungOct 24, 2004 22:38
Novel twist. [26 words]David SabghirOct 24, 2004 22:13
Excellent article! [204 words]Ann KilsdoonkOct 24, 2004 21:17
Connecting the dots [136 words]AnnaOct 24, 2004 21:10
Pres. Bush and the Mideast. [120 words]Jeanne ZangerOct 24, 2004 20:49
Bush is the "liberal" and Kerry the "conservative"? [112 words]Fred LapidesOct 24, 2004 20:21
Palestinian State? [155 words]Rosalee BrauerOct 24, 2004 20:09
Bush in the Mideast [97 words]Peter J. HerzOct 24, 2004 19:43
Perceptive [25 words]Lyn NofzigerOct 24, 2004 18:44

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page