69 million page views

One Thing Even More Sure

Reader comment on item: Immanuel Kant vs. Israel
in response to reader comment: One thing is sure

Submitted by M. Tovey (United States), Aug 23, 2010 at 12:29

As we enter into a period of pending renewed negotiations (the word is used loosely here) at the behest of the current American Administration, to develop a sense of what is yet another attempt to interfere with the sovereign national interests of Israel, we wonder what can be achieved this time that has not been achieved before. For PM Netanyahu, it is further speculated that after being rebuffed earlier in the year, that only political courtesy is being offered, for the issues are debated already with no mutual consensus determined and world pressure brought to bear upon Israel.

Now it seems from here that the American Administration is looking for the political power to avert a total political collapse that is sure to beset the Democratic Party in America for the Administration's failure to 'solve' the American nation's problems. What better way than to divert attention to the other side of the world and adopt a global strategy for a 'common' solution to the ages old (and humanly insolvable) antagonisms of the Middle East. Is it peace you want, you say?

It is in the Middle East peace process that we see the collision of the sensitivities that have tried to combine, then recombine in failure all of the participants' anticipations for a peace that can last, all failing for not realizing that peace for all requires peace for Jerusalem as the capital of Israel alone. But as amply demonstrated, the antipathies against the Jews in their own land by a decidedly humanistic mentality, undergirded by an empty religious fervor that seeks transcendence without the truth, such peace is not possible for all parties concerned. So a truth that has the power of transcendence is required. It is that Truth that will carry Israel in the day Israel will need it the most; but we are not there yet.

The perspectives of the nation-state versus borderless globalism being used to determine an insufficiency of a national destiny in a world seeking answers for international issues is not new to the political realm. If one were to examine the histories of all the empires of the ages, it is seen that conquering and domination of the conquered is a core objective in world history. It goes back to the time after the flood, where the people of that time sought their destiny in a collaborative effort to impose human control over destinies, only to find they had no power to do so. It is the same today.

Up until the time of World War Two, humanity was embroiled in efforts of military endeavors to force the will of one nation against another, yet the military will appeared limited by the military might of one side versus another, and the struggle to obtain greater power for the military was constant. This sometimes led to an argument that a balance of power was necessary to maintain peace, at least in 'sensible' minds. With the end of the Second World War by the development of nuclear power, this balance was forever changed. If a smaller nation could develop its nuclear edge, then it could get in there and 'play with the big boys.' Now how will peace be 'balanced' if the willpower of an unbalanced mind obtains the military power to breach the peace by nuclear means? That is what we face today.

Is it global peace, a peace of supra-national influences, that is being sought after in the Middle East? Not really, even in the face of the international community trying to impose the weight of the world on Israel to relinquish even one square inch. Yet the American Administration thinks to barter just exactly that. And what is going to happen when that fails, again?

There seems to be some confusion as to the answer on that. We read here of the Israeli imperative –Never Again. And as true as it may be that the world will never again have the opportunity, let alone the ability to completely impose man's will on Israel, Israel is not out of the woods yet.

There is irony here. The world tries again to impose its will on tiny little Israel, not realizing that in doing so, that it brings upon the world the impending doom that it is so desperately trying to avoid. Trying to impose a globalists' influence to take away the nation-state status of Israel will result in an international conflict the likes of which the world has never known before, and will never get to know thereafter. Yet tiny little Israel, the place the world could have cared less about from the time of the crusades until now, will be magnified amongst the nations in a way that no human could have, or would have imagined, unless they did one thing.

Arriving at a saving knowledge of Yeshua HaMashiach and having faith in Him to bring one to salvation, and recognizing Israel as the place where all humanity will be focused on the Person of Israel's Savior is the only way to make sense of why the world must be subjected to the consequences of unbelief. In the final analysis of the ultimate paradigm, nothing else will make sense.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (113) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
1"Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe" (OSCE) 57 countries) [386 words]RobertSep 30, 2022 11:32286982
1Cooperation by Coercion - Following When True Leadership is Usurped for Reasons of Ambitions of Empire [84 words]M ToveyOct 1, 2022 16:31286982
1New World Order and the United Nations. [382 words]RobertSep 30, 2022 07:45286975
Current American Dollar Currency Demonstrates Changes in American Governance from Constitutionalist to Bureaucratic Authoritarian [321 words]M ToveySep 30, 2022 15:53286975
1Let Muslims disambiguate among their subdivisions [169 words]PrashantApr 2, 2021 14:32265259
2Prashant! What is Judaism and Christianity? [87 words]RobertSep 29, 2022 15:09265259
Judeo-Christianity in A More Basic Covenant Testament [210 words]M ToveySep 29, 2022 21:36265259
1My view of Judaism and Christianity (and Islam) [199 words]PrashantSep 30, 2022 13:48265259
5It's simple: Israel used to be the land of kibbutzes and socialism [43 words]Base MavenSep 26, 2010 04:16178702
1religión e historia [242 words]luciano tantoSep 13, 2010 10:11178196
1Reminds me of this quote, from Solzhenitsyn... [225 words]The Sanity InspectorSep 10, 2010 12:16178002
1Kant...Shmant! [274 words]RoqueSep 2, 2010 00:29177577
Paradigm Shifts [178 words]RobertAug 31, 2010 19:00177514
Wrong [11 words]Abu NudnikOct 5, 2010 14:03177514
1Re: Paradigm shift [82 words]Robert VillegasOct 5, 2010 19:04177514
3Kant? A puppet of the Jesuit Order [2141 words]alessandro alboreAug 31, 2010 15:06177508
coo-coo, coo-coo, coo-coo, coo-coo [8 words]Abu NudnikOct 5, 2010 13:58177508
Aged 55, Count Wladimir Ledochowski? [15 words]DDec 24, 2021 13:39177508
2The Left, David, and Goliath. [189 words]LynnAug 30, 2010 09:49177456
IV Reich is behind us, TRUE Jews, true gentiles [251 words]alessandro alboreAug 29, 2010 19:01177434
the GOST Nation [2006 words]alessandro alboreAug 29, 2010 07:36177417
Open your eyes, everybody [908 words]alessandro alboreAug 29, 2010 07:06177415
Here is a similar assessment. [23 words]ITZIGAug 29, 2010 04:15177414
Kant vs Israel [97 words]Amo FuchsAug 27, 2010 04:32177347
Location, Location, Location [52 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
CalebAug 25, 2010 14:06177268
Utopia is nowhere! On Mr. Pipes´ addendum dated August 17 concerning the Left. [213 words]Isaac HaskiyaAug 25, 2010 12:06177265
1I do agree [54 words]VladimirAug 25, 2010 10:12177262
5Anti-Israel polemics are rooting for the UN as the new emerging power structure as opposed to nation states. [428 words]TarnowAug 24, 2010 09:44177197
I dissent from Hazony's view [102 words]Peter HerzAug 23, 2010 22:01177173
over-sophistication [119 words]yuval Brandstetter MDAug 23, 2010 10:46177143
American means freedom from or for Religion [41 words]RONAug 24, 2010 00:23177143
1This analysis is true in the case of left thinkers and intellectuals [42 words]Yael F.Aug 22, 2010 06:52177085
3Oversophistication. [60 words]Menchem ChazanAug 21, 2010 15:03177049
Oversimplification [4 words]PenstarrsAug 26, 2010 21:19177049
8The flaw in Hazony's thesis [400 words]Alex SafianAug 21, 2010 12:15177045
1"Immanuel Kant vs. Israel" [203 words]norine krasnogorAug 20, 2010 22:47177034
2KANT VS. ISRAEL [281 words]RafiAug 20, 2010 16:54177024
Paradigm shift not worth a dime [137 words]BernieAug 19, 2010 17:05176987
Cosmopolis by Stephen Toulmin [19 words]Hillel S.Aug 19, 2010 16:41176986
1putting Kuhn and Kant in some context [374 words]mythAug 19, 2010 09:54176971
6Immanuel Kant vs. Israel [1785 words]Morry MarkovitzAug 19, 2010 01:49176950
Immanuel Kant vs. Israel [40 words]Morry MarkovitzAug 22, 2010 03:40176950
1some recent facts about the national idea [189 words]mythAug 22, 2010 06:28176950
Kant vs Israel [142 words]Morry MarkovitzAug 22, 2010 23:05176950
Kant vs Israel [489 words]Morry MarkovitzAug 22, 2010 23:33176950
my response to "some recent facts about the national idea" [183 words]Morry MarkovitzAug 24, 2010 00:17176950
almost contentless [90 words]mythAug 24, 2010 12:29176950
4Science, facts, truth [391 words]MorryAug 26, 2010 19:19176950
4Science, facts, truth #2 [1866 words]MorryAug 26, 2010 19:24176950
"myth" is right: fact and truth are not the same [79 words]Abu NudnikOct 5, 2010 14:23176950
Don't be too hard on Kant [276 words]Peter HerzDec 18, 2010 22:02176950
Immanuel Kant vs. Israel , reply to Peter Herz's reply [2267 words]Morry MarkovitzDec 20, 2010 02:21176950
Rejoinder to a pecksniffian [133 words]Honoring TeachersJun 7, 2011 02:41176950
Hatred of Israel [228 words]Ilbert PhillipsAug 19, 2010 00:43176947
don't accept the hazony thesis [67 words]paulAug 18, 2010 15:44176910
1Paradigm here, paradigm there, paradigm everywhere. [235 words]Isaac HaskiyaAug 18, 2010 14:03176901
4Fort Apache, The Middle East. [472 words]Cherif El-AyoutyAug 18, 2010 05:27176884
8Fort Europe [211 words]Bert TateAug 21, 2010 05:04176884
It´s not shifting deelings towards the national state, but new realities [152 words]Lars NielsenAug 18, 2010 05:10176882
3Israel a victim of the paradigm shift dieses [150 words]Prakash KhatiwalaAug 18, 2010 01:31176878
12Yoram Hazony's thesis is probably not correct [333 words]RajeevAug 17, 2010 23:55176877
Great Minds Think Alike [103 words]Stuart FaginAug 17, 2010 23:53176876
Jew hatred to be precise [78 words]Anne JulienneAug 18, 2010 16:55176876
Now I understand [38 words]John W. McGinleyAug 17, 2010 22:33176873
A victim of our own success [98 words]Shepard BarbashAug 17, 2010 22:08176870
What's the difference? [170 words]Yoel LernerAug 17, 2010 21:39176868
2Kant's Revolution [285 words]J KourlasAug 17, 2010 21:28176867
Revolution under Kant and under Islam [229 words]Anne JulienneAug 18, 2010 17:42176867
3Kant as "the founder of the counter-Enlightenment" in the light of his essay "What is Enlightement" [444 words]IanusAug 19, 2010 16:16176867
Kant's not so universal universalism [348 words]Elliott A GreenAug 20, 2010 09:03176867
Comment on Green's Critique of Kant [167 words]J KourlasAug 21, 2010 21:23176867
Read the book [41 words]J KourlasAug 21, 2010 22:02176867
3Reading Kant's Perpetual Peace [418 words]J KourlasAug 22, 2010 09:18176867
response about Kant's Judeophobia [65 words]Elliott A GreenAug 22, 2010 17:48176867
1Doubts as "dogmatic slumber" [123 words]IanusAug 22, 2010 18:05176867
1Kant's "single ruler" paradigm [336 words]Anne JulienneAug 22, 2010 21:45176867
4Death to Israel Isn't a Theory [316 words]HistoryscoperAug 17, 2010 21:22176866
3Mohammed vs. Israel , not Kant ! [121 words]IanusAug 18, 2010 18:38176866
3Yoram Hazony is not so smart [233 words]yonatan silvermanAug 17, 2010 21:21176865
Yonatan silverman on Yoram Hazony [69 words]efraim CarlsenMar 4, 2013 15:12176865
Myopic Paradigm [140 words]Marilyn AbramovitzAug 17, 2010 20:30176861
Explanation [14 words]DennisWojciakAug 17, 2010 19:57176857
3Israel vs. Kant - Following the True Paradigm - Israel is Not Immune - But Will Recover [816 words]M. ToveyAug 17, 2010 19:33176854
If the truth be known ... [25 words]Anne JulienneAug 17, 2010 20:17176854
one thing always seems left out [78 words]NoraAug 18, 2010 04:49176854
3One thing is sure [201 words]Solomon TaraganoAug 18, 2010 11:33176854
Shape Shifting Paradigms Always Leave Out One Thing - Truth [409 words]M. ToveyAug 18, 2010 17:36176854
Perpetual Peace in Human Terms Cannot Compare to the Peace That Passes All 'Human' Understanding. [27 words]M. ToveyAug 18, 2010 18:09176854
1One Thing Even More Sure [867 words]M. ToveyAug 23, 2010 12:29176854
Irony - The More Things Seem to Change- the More They Seem the Same [168 words]M ToveyMar 31, 2021 20:01176854
Let us double check Biden's executive orders. [55 words]PrashantApr 1, 2021 19:15176854
Exectuve Decisions - Whose Orders Should Be Observed - The Holy or Unholy [225 words]M ToveyApr 4, 2021 15:49176854
New 'Paradigm': You've Got to Be Kidding! [448 words]JoeAug 17, 2010 18:57176851
Ironic [78 words]Abu NudnikAug 17, 2010 18:38176850
4But something central is Overlooked [687 words]Ron ThompsonAug 17, 2010 18:27176849
1the new pardigm [469 words]gingersnapAug 17, 2010 20:34176849
1The new paradigm doesn't explain enough [221 words]Erich WiegerAug 17, 2010 18:12176847
1Why the anti-Israel hostility? [90 words]TarnowAug 17, 2010 17:29176845
1Kant and Kuhn misunderstood [145 words]Anne JulienneAug 17, 2010 17:26176844
Can't Use Kant to Describe Israel's Dilemma with the World Governments [388 words]M. ToveyAug 19, 2010 18:56176844
Nation states don't need supra-national entities to control themselves [44 words]Abu NudnikOct 5, 2010 14:15176844
What's Holding Us Back? [119 words]Kim BruceAug 17, 2010 17:20176843
Kant's antisemitism [75 words]Paul Lawrence RoseAug 17, 2010 17:06176842
2Kant's antisemitism ? [192 words]IanusAug 18, 2010 15:41176842
Kant and German Antisemitism [144 words]PLRoseAug 27, 2010 21:04176842
3Is criticizing Judaism or Jews ipso facto anti-Semitism ? [429 words]IanusAug 30, 2010 10:31176842
1DEJA VU in 2010.... how frightening [178 words]saraAug 30, 2010 17:15176842
Interesting point of view [71 words]Mike ShapiroAug 17, 2010 17:06176841
2Kant and Islam [105 words]Anne JulienneAug 17, 2010 19:46176841
4Avraham Burg - don't waste your proverbial ink on him. [198 words]Yehuda, Ottawa, CanadaAug 17, 2010 17:00176840
1burg [60 words]solemnmanAug 18, 2010 05:15176840
1Burg - utter scum [86 words]EliyahuAug 23, 2010 04:57176840
burg has no principles [63 words]EliyahuAug 23, 2010 05:01176840

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)