69 million page views

THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS.

Reader comment on item: "An Arabist's Guide to Egyptian Colloquial" Now Online
in response to reader comment: More delusions

Submitted by IamJoseph (Australia), May 5, 2010 at 20:55

For the readers read and laugh. To remind you this thread is about Egyptian Arabic (EA) and is it a language or an Arabic dialect. I happen to believe that it is a language and the starting point of it was 642CE when the Arabs invaded Egypt and this is what I wrote

# The 642 date was never argued, but you have been denying that Arabic emerged around 400 CE, and that the Arab race is from time immorial, which I maintain is only from 500 BCE. This has been the basis of debate. Every one knows when Islamic arabs invaded Egypt - and that Egypt was not Arab before 642. The same applies with the land of Israel - this was invaded and a mosque dumped there - and today they claim immorial ownership, denying the historicity of Judea and Jerusalem as a Hebrew capital. Like Egypt, Judea was also robbed. These are not opinions but historical facts.

--------------------------------------

>No this is not a debate this is "I dhimmi no more telling you so" ... and it is about EA or did you forget?

Now our dear iam has no clue what is really EA and why is it a language and not a dialect . He does not know any Arabic or EA and his Egyptian history book is the Bible! He cannot tell the difference between the Egyptian language and EA. Then he is preoccupied with the "Arab race" and in the process he has no clue about what the history of the Arabs and their language are all about

# You can shout EA till the camels come home. It has no impact of the date the Arabic writings emerged. I explained to you, Arabic is an admix of ancient languages, including Hebrew, Aramaic, Assyrian, Latin, etc. This means the reverse of what you claim - it means this is not an original language. I explained to you that the Hebrew and Aramaic lived adjacent to the Egyptian - not so any Arabic. The Coptic language - different from Arabic - is closer to the Egyptian. I also explained to you - Egypt was not Arab. So you see, far from my history knowledge being limited to the Hebrew bible - I also know general history.

And BTW, your statements the Hebrew bible is myth is also a proof you are afflicted with what you accuse me of: the Hebrew bible happens to be the most credible writings in all recorded history, with over 70% of its texts being scientifically proven. You base your ignorance on such things like FX Miracles, then using this to disregard the historicity contained in the same passages of the Hebrew bible. Thus you claim, on the basis that we cannot prove the sea split - as proof the Israelites were not in Egypt and they never return to Canaan and remained there till 70 CE. You cannot accuse others of not knowing history!

-------------------------------------

Then he tells us that there was no "Arabs or is it Arabic and only allahu a3lam before 400CE and notice that he is mixing Arabs, Arabic, alphabet, extant evidence all in one. Then when he was reminded of the Arabs of Herodotus and the Arabs of the periplus he changed his mind and told us that the "Arab race" existed from 500BCE in other words they just dropped from the sky and he our dear iam did agree with Herodotus. Sohanallah

# Those names you quote have no connection with Arabs, which I respnded to numerously. The term Arab does not appear there, nor any Arabic writings, nor any follow-up Arab or Arabic imprints between 900 BCE and 500 BCE. Compare this to the Hebrew imprints in that same period - factor in also that the fictional pre-500 BCE Arabs had no Arab kings, queens, cities, monument, wars or any marks whatsoever - exactly the reverse of the Jewish history. Most importantly, factor also that the fictional pre-500 BCE Arabs, unlike the Jews, were not exiled, dispersed or their nation destroyed. What's your excuse for such a blatant, striking vaccum? Your problem is that I am applying real, factual and historical questions - not biblical ones, and your own history is dismal and in denial.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Oh the Periplus? He had no clue what is really the Periplus and then when he checked in wikipedia he came back with the little gem that I some how told him that the authors of the Periplus were belonging to the "Arab race". Then when he was provided with literary sources by Assyrians and from his Bible to the existence of the Arabs as early as 900BCE. He refused (as if anyone cares) such sources but notice that he has no difficulty accepting the Arabs of Herodotus go figure. I told him to go and write a book and tell the world that Resto and Hoyland and Versteegh are all wrong and that there was no "Arab race" before 500BCE and I promised him that he will be making a fool of himself. I even suggested that on his next visit to Israel that he should stop at the Dept of Arabic and islamic studies to tell them about his little gems and I assured him that they will laugh at him

# Again, and more links for you. Periplus is 1st Century and nothing to do with Arabs::

The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea: [http://wysinger.homestead.com/periplus.html]

Travel and Trade in the Indian Ocean by a Merchant of the First Century

Again - 1st Century; nothing to do with Arabs:

A Sailing Manual: [http://wysinger.homestead.com/periplus.html]

The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea (Periplus Maris Erythraei) is a Greek periplus, describing navigation and trading opportunities from Roman Egyptian ports like Berenice along the coast of the Red Sea, and others along East Africa and India. Sometime in the middle of the first century AD, an anonymous merchant or sailor compiled a guidebook to the ports and sailing conditions of the Erythraean Sea. The Periplus Maris Erythraei ("Guidebook of the Erythraean Sea") is the only document of its kind known to have survived. The author is unknown, it is clearly a firsthand description by someone familiar with the area, and is nearly unique in providing accurate insights into what the ancient world knew about the lands around the region. Erythraean Sea is the term applied by Greek and Roman geographers to the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf. [map]

The 'Periplus of the Red Sea' was written around the year 70 CE by an anonymous Alexandrian Egyptian merchant and captain, who certainly had personal experience in vast parts of that navigation and trade network area, and wished to compile a kind of guide for sailors and traders.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Oh the Arabic language: This is where it gets bizarre. Now here is our dear iam who cannot read speak or write Arabic

# How do you know that!?

---------------------------------------------------------

and has no clue about how to read historical literary sources but that does not stop him from pontificating about such topic. Then he tells us that there really is no Arabic language or is it texts or is it race before 400CE. And when he was reminded that texts can be oral or they can be in written form

# I agreed there can be oral forms - the debate was about 'WRITTEN' Arabic. Oral cannot be proven - that is why you cling to it. Can you prove English was not orally spoen 2 million years ago?

------------------------------------------------------------------

and that we indeed have evidence from the Qur'anic text that some of such texts can pre-date the Qur'an by hundrerds of years,

# No, this is not plausable. Better, if a Quranic text predates the Quran, and we see that text in other books, such as the Hebrew - it means the Quran copied it. Rocket science. Otherwise you can write a book and copy the Quran and claim the same thing today also.

--------------------------------------------------------

and that the Arabs used other alphabtes for their texts as in using Syriac or Garshouni Arabic

# This means they copied from an earlier writings. Where else can they get it from? The English language is an admix of many older languages too.

---------------------------------------

and that written literary sources can be lost or destroyed or they can be stored some place waiting to be discovered

# Agreed. So come back when they are discovered, and deal with the present status quo. Nor is there any plausable reason it can exist and not found. We found the dead sea scrolls - where is yours? Were the Arabs exiled and barred from returning - all their cities plowed and looted - as with the Jews? - so what's your basis of making a claim your proof may be discovered in the future? And you call my arguements as gooblecook?

------------------------------------------------

as in the case of the Nag Hammadi library and the Qumran library and good historians are very aware of the so called "argument from silence" in other words if he would have said there is no EXTANT literary sources prior to a certain date he would be correct.

# No, there is no comparison here with the Qumran's dead sea scrolls. This writings has a thread of books for a 1000 years, and only its 'AFFIRMATION' was discovered at Qumram. This is not the case with the Quran having as yet undiscovered writings which predate it. It only logically affirms that there is no Arabic writings pre-400 CE.

------------------------------------------------------

And indeed the earliest Arabic language inscription (notice that epigraphy and coins as literary sources survive more than papyri) is from Qaryat al-Faw and is dated to 100-300BCE

# LOL. You have twisted CE with BCE:

  • archaeological excavation (in history of Arabia: Prehistory and archaeology; [http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/485528/Qaryat-al-Faw ]

    ...and Taymāʾ to the northeast of the other two, have long been known but not fully explored. In south central Arabia, near Al-Sulayyil, a town site at Qaryat Dhāt Kāhil (now Qaryat al-Fāw) has yielded rich results from excavation. In northeastern Arabia, inland from modern Al-Qaṭīf, a Danish expedition has revealed a hitherto unsuspected pre-Islamic...

    in history of Arabia: Kindah )

    ...authority. Its area of influence was south central Arabia, from the Yemeni border nearly up to Mecca. The discovery of the tomb of a king of Kindah (datable to perhaps the 3rd century ad) at Qaryat Dhāt Kāhil, on the trade route linking Najrān with the east coast, suggests that this site was in all likelihood the royal headquarters. Sabaean texts of the 2nd and 3rd...

# Do you see - even the 3rd Centure CE is debatable - and no Arab word or Arabic writings is seen attached there.

----------------------------------------------------------

and there is a two lines in Arabic language inscription from 3ayn Abdot in Israel and dated between 87-150CE he went back and told me that "there is no Arabic before 400CE" and when he was reminded about an Arabic language epigraphy from 328CE he changed his mind and told me that there was no Arabic before 300CE and when I reminded him why did he change his mind? He told me 300 is close to 400 and what a hypocrite and he reminds me of Muslims that tell us ya3ni bel taqreeb or it is close enough

# I did not change my mind. The Avdot reference has already been responded to. The 328 date is not impacting, it is just 70 years older, but has no verifiable connection with Arabic. Alphabets, or bits of alphabets, can easily be mistaken to look like whatever one chooses. The impacting factor is that we have no Arabic writings from 328 to 400 CE.

--------------------------------------------------

Now yes the Arabic language became a fully fledged language by the 3rd century of Islam through the works of the Muslim masorites and the great grammarian Sibawayhe and the great Ishaq ibn Hunein and the final step was Ibn Manzur great dictionary of the Arabic language Lisan al-3Arab

# This is not what you say, but what I said - and you denied it. Arabic writings is an admix of various older, well established writings of Arabia and Europe, and this occured around 400 CE - aka the 3rd Century.

---------------------------------------------

># Yes, it was about EA,

So what does this have to do with your bogus claims so far?

>and I responded that the EA is bogus

Only fools would utter this nonsense

# Only fools cannot show us any Arabic alongside the Egyptian, but we see that there is Aramaic, Hebrew & Greek alongside the Egyptian. Where is the Arabic here?!

------------------------------------------------------------

>and has no relation to Arabic writings.

Hello: EA is written in Arabic alphabet! What an ignorant man

# No - the Arabic alphabets came much later, when Arabic writings emerged. No such thing as alphabets dangling in space with no writings of it. Egypt is not Arab, its language not Arabic, and we have no Arabic writings pre-400 CE.

------------------------------------------------------

>How can you claim EA when Arabic writings emerged only in 400 CE?

Hello: I never said that as the Arabs invaded Egypt in 642CE. ...

# This only shows why Egypt was not Arab before this date. The Arabs invaded Egypt and are persecuting the Coptics, who should have a state of their own. Egypt is not sacred Islamic soil - it is one got in robbery, while the Jews have never stolen anyone's land in all their 4000 year history. Facts on the table.

-----------------------------------------------------

> We have no Arabic writings which tell us about Arabs or anything connected to Arabs.

It is OK if you dislike Islam but to hate people is evil do you get it?

# How can I dislike Islam, when it is Muslims who are negating all Jewish rights, and openly declaring to wipe Israel off the map - with grotesque silence from all Muslims? Does this say that I hate Islam:

"THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE TO THE UTTER DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL - WE WILL DRIVE ALL THE JEWS INTO THE SEA" - Nasser.

Your charges are confusing - what is it based on - my expose of falsified history?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now do me a favor and go and read a real book of history

# Thank you. But stealing another peoples' land - dumping a Mosque on the known sacred site of another people - then denying it - is not history, and cannot be justified because some Muslims say it is written in their scriptures or this is their belief. Better:

THOU SHALT NOT STEAL.

THOU SHALT NOT COVET,

THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS.

THIU SHALT NO FOLLOW A CORRUPT MULTITIDE.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (191) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
re: Arabic vernacular [97 words]LUANNE M ASHEFeb 12, 2017 08:29236657
2The debate in Egypt now is about not just al-hijab and al-niqab but also what is really the language of Egypt [452 words]dhimmi no moreAug 29, 2010 09:20177419
1The mantra of many young people in Egypt now is: "i"m Egyptian not Arab" [195 words]dhimmi no moreJul 12, 2010 19:07175474
Arabic language threatened in it's homeland [713 words]VijayJun 16, 2010 07:24174457
Muhammedian affinity [94 words]DONVANFeb 10, 2010 10:38168755
From quran [99 words]skalMar 30, 2010 16:12168755
Blissful Political Correction [342 words]ArlindaJan 12, 2010 19:15167255
Diglossia [96 words]VijayJan 3, 2010 08:49166768
Egyptian Arabic is it a case of diglossia or it is a unique language and the ligua sacra [504 words]dhimmi no moreJan 6, 2010 12:10166768
Egyptian Arabic [266 words]VijayJan 7, 2010 18:37166768
3More about Egyptian Arabic [1013 words]dhimmi no moreJan 9, 2010 09:07166768
EGYPT WAS NOT ARAB; ARABIC IS A NEW LANGUAGE. [150 words]IamJosephApr 6, 2010 03:17166768
Vijay: The fundamental things apply. [295 words]IamJosephApr 6, 2010 19:57166768
ALLAH DID NOT REGARD THE PHARAOHS EVIL - THE TORAH DID. [159 words]IamJosephApr 6, 2010 20:09166768
DIGLOSSIA THEME IS A FAKE HERE. [454 words]IamJosephApr 8, 2010 20:43166768
Yes the Copts are persecuted in Egypt and it is a fact [262 words]dhimmi no moreApr 9, 2010 19:07166768
Our dear Jospeh needs to take a deep breath [306 words]dhimmi no moreApr 9, 2010 19:18166768
Diglossia and our dear Jospeh [163 words]dhimmi no moreApr 9, 2010 19:29166768
NO ARAB RACE PRE-500 BCE. [571 words]IamJosephApr 10, 2010 19:51166768
THE POINT! [305 words]IamJosephApr 10, 2010 20:11166768
GOBBLEDYGOOK, NOT! [568 words]IamJosephApr 10, 2010 21:55166768
Our Dear Iam who is not very focused [909 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 07:42166768
Point? What point? [440 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 18:12166768
Our Dear Iam part deux [855 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 18:45166768
Gem time and our dear Joseph [130 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 19:07166768
Focused response to yah habibi. [1473 words]IamJosephApr 12, 2010 20:48166768
MOSES WAS THE FIRST ZIONIST. [634 words]IamJosephApr 12, 2010 21:08166768
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [544 words]IamJoseph'Apr 14, 2010 05:54166768
It is ya and not your bogus yah [1956 words]dhimmi no moreApr 14, 2010 18:04166768
RE: gobbeldygook [1619 words]IamJosephApr 15, 2010 20:13166768
And the comedy goes on and on [2049 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 07:57166768
Ya habibi: Is EA a lugha or a lahja? [640 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 08:14166768
The Arabs in antiquity and more references that attest to the existence of the Arabs from the 9th century BCE [406 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 10:14166768
Four for the price of one: Arabs and their language, their kings, Syro-Arabic all in one in the namara inscription [275 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 14:35166768
THE SAME NONSENSE REPEATED HERE. [454 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 01:36166768
THESE REFERENCES HAVE NO RELATION TO ARABS. [633 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 02:15166768
THERE IS NO READING ISSUE HERE - JUST A LACK OF PROOF. [35 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 02:19166768
NO ARAB RACE PRE-500 BCE. [539 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 02:42166768
Four for the price of one: Arabs and their language, their kings, Syro-Arabic all in one in the namara inscription part deux [620 words]dhimmi no moreApr 20, 2010 07:19166768
Ya habibi: Is EA a lugha or a lahja? part deux [119 words]dhimmi no moreApr 20, 2010 07:26166768
Cherry picking time and our dear iam and EA [959 words]dhimmi no moreApr 20, 2010 18:51166768
NO EVDENCE MEANS ITS A FICTION. [286 words]IamJosephApr 20, 2010 21:19166768
The Arabs and their language and our dear iam [78 words]dhimmi no moreApr 22, 2010 06:25166768
Four for the price of one: Arabs and their language, their kings, Syro-Arabic all in one in the namara inscription part trois [758 words]dhimmi no moreApr 22, 2010 06:41166768
NO EVIDENCES PRODUCED HERE. [1051 words]IamJosephApr 22, 2010 21:07166768
RE DISHONESTY. [158 words]IamJosephApr 22, 2010 21:17166768
MANIPULATING HSTORY. [671 words]IamJosephApr 23, 2010 00:17166768
RESPONDING TO ALL YOUR UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS: [949 words]IamJosephApr 23, 2010 21:50166768
And more ignorance [486 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2010 06:24166768
Cherry picking time and our dear iam [75 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2010 06:58166768
Our dear iam and some of the Quranic material pre-dates Muhammad by hundreds of years and "argument from silence" [1597 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2010 09:39166768
Egypt should pay us Jews backpay for building the fa cochta Pyramids! [47 words]Benny zeeApr 25, 2010 14:30166768
ARAB & ARABIAN ARE NOT EQUAL. [217 words]IamJosephApr 25, 2010 22:09166768
TRUTHFULNESS IS GREATER THAN TRUTH. [1358 words]IamJosephApr 25, 2010 22:45166768
Our dear iam and the word ghalabawi [311 words]dhimmi no moreApr 27, 2010 06:44166768
Our dear iam and "argument from silence" [1778 words]dhimmi no moreApr 27, 2010 07:27166768
NO PROOF BY THIS POSTER IN ANY F HIS CLAIMS. [403 words]IamJosephApr 28, 2010 05:47166768
INCULCATED DENIAL IS SEEN THROUGHOUT THIS DEBATE. [636 words]IamJosephApr 28, 2010 21:38166768
Our dear iam and more comedy [1044 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 06:56166768
NO PROOF ANYWHERE IN YOUR POSTS. [1005 words]IamJosephMay 1, 2010 23:31166768
Our dear iam and the Qur'an [1122 words]dhimmi no moreMay 2, 2010 09:17166768
NO CHANGES BY YOUR COMMENTS. [1661 words]IamJosephMay 3, 2010 20:24166768
At last our dear iam is discovering the Periplus but did he read it? that is a different! and he also discovered the Arabs that lived in the Syrian desert and! [1242 words]dhimmi no moreMay 4, 2010 07:12166768
It seems that at last our dear iam gets it [2214 words]dhimmi no moreMay 4, 2010 17:54166768
EGYPT WAS NOT ARAB. [339 words]IamJoseohMay 4, 2010 22:46166768
More delusions [996 words]dhimmi no moreMay 5, 2010 06:47166768
Coptic is an alpahebt and Egytpian is a langauge [62 words]dhimmi no moreMay 5, 2010 18:31166768
THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS. [2453 words]IamJosephMay 5, 2010 20:55166768
BIG FONTS - BIG DENIALS. [332 words]IamJosephMay 6, 2010 20:26166768
The language is called Egyptian or metremnkemi and the abgad is Greek with 6 more consonants [449 words]dhimmi no moreMay 7, 2010 18:26166768
NO PROOFS WHATSOEVER HERE. [1420 words]IamJosephMay 7, 2010 22:03166768
THERE IS NO FRAUD IN THE HEBREW WRITINGS. [1577 words]IamJosephMay 7, 2010 23:00166768
Egypt and its languages 101 and this is as basic as it can be [381 words]dhimmi no moreMay 8, 2010 10:36166768
DENIALS WITH NO ADMISSION OF THE FACTS. [683 words]IamJosephMay 8, 2010 22:48166768
The Arabs as people [152 words]dhimmi no moreMay 9, 2010 06:32166768
Arabs in the literary sources before 500BCE [73 words]dhimmi no moreMay 9, 2010 07:06166768
The Diglossia Desperation to hype a total forgery. [358 words]IamJosephMay 11, 2010 02:58166768
YOU ARE GRASPING AT FALSE PREMISES. [580 words]IamJosephMay 11, 2010 03:28166768
NO 'ARAB' - ONLY 'ARABIAN' [262 words]IamJosephMay 11, 2010 07:35166768
More comedy [264 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 06:47166768
ARAB & ARABIAN ARE NOT EQUAL. [484 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 22:00166768
Why we Egyptians do not speak Arabic [93 words]Ahmed EgyptianMay 24, 2010 11:22166768
The language of Egypt [203 words]dhimmi no moreMay 25, 2010 18:20166768
Dr. Pipes statements [378 words]YnnatchkahJan 3, 2010 03:00166756
5Great Topic: Egyptian Arabic is a lugha and not a lahga or even lugha 3amiyya [696 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dhimmi no moreJan 2, 2010 09:44166717
THERE WAS NEVER AN EGYPTIAN ARABIC PRE-500 BCE. [162 words]IamJosephApr 10, 2010 22:09166717
More gems from our dear iamjoseph [203 words]dhimmi no moreApr 12, 2010 18:51166717
Our dear Iamjospeh and more comedy [383 words]dhimmi no moreApr 14, 2010 08:06166717
No Gobbledygook [135 words]IamJosephApr 15, 2010 20:20166717
Yes gobbledygook [243 words]dhimmi no moreApr 17, 2010 08:06166717
No Gobbledygook [126 words]IamJosephApr 19, 2010 02:25166717
Oh yeah real gobbledygook and ano chi is Arabic ana hay! gasp!!! [216 words]dhimmi no moreApr 20, 2010 19:05166717
NO PROOF BY THIS POSTER IN ANY F HIS CLAIMS. [147 words]IamJosephApr 20, 2010 21:27166717
Hebrew and Arabic and Syriac have much in common but nothing in common with the language of Egypt [179 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2010 06:32166717
1JEWS NEVER STEAL LANDS. [458 words]IamJosephApr 24, 2010 21:20166717
AnoChi and the language of Egypt and anok pe or ang pe [767 words]dhimmi no moreApr 26, 2010 07:36166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [731 words]IamJosephApr 26, 2010 23:26166717
More delusions [1282 words]dhimmi no moreApr 28, 2010 07:38166717
DENIAL OF HISTORY. [1394 words]IamJosephApr 28, 2010 20:35166717
The Greeks invaded Arabia? Really? Hint: Egypt ain't Arabia [149 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 07:11166717
Our dear iam is pontificating about not just one language but several languages that he are clueless about [721 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 07:31166717
The 'En Avadat aka 'En Abadat's Arabic language inscription dated 88 to 150CE [451 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 11:56166717
our dear iam al-munafiq al-kabeer and his so called experts [617 words]dhimmi no moreMay 1, 2010 15:16166717
THERE IS NO PROOF WHEN THEY SHOULD BE 1000's OF PROOF. [1666 words]IamJoseph'May 1, 2010 21:42166717
NO PROOF CONTINUES. [507 words]IamJosephMay 1, 2010 23:49166717
This time our dear iam does not seem to realize that history is never black and white [450 words]dhimmi no moreMay 2, 2010 12:41166717
Arabic inscriptions revisited [126 words]dhimmi no moreMay 4, 2010 08:12166717
BANKRUPTCY OF PROOF IS NOW BLATANT. [824 words]IamJosephMay 4, 2010 22:35166717
YOUR OWN SOURCES PROVE YOU WRONG. [363 words]IamJosephMay 4, 2010 23:01166717
More delusions [14 words]dhimmi no moreMay 5, 2010 18:23166717
More ignorance and more comedy [80 words]dhimmi no moreMay 5, 2010 18:38166717
Arabic inscriptions revisited and our dear iam' and more comedy [984 words]dhimmi no moreMay 6, 2010 06:47166717
Books and History. [222 words]IamJosephMay 6, 2010 20:37166717
Fase connections are not proofs. [1992 words]IAMjosephMay 6, 2010 21:39166717
CLECK MATE AGAIN. [226 words]IamJosephMay 6, 2010 21:54166717
1More from our dear iam [147 words]dhimmi no moreMay 7, 2010 17:59166717
Gem time [159 words]dhimmi no moreMay 7, 2010 18:07166717
REASONINGS WITHOUT ANY MERITS. [524 words]IamJosephMay 7, 2010 21:29166717
RE, PALESTINE AND COPTICS. [263 words]IamJoseohMay 7, 2010 22:18166717
our dear iam [71 words]dhimmi no moreMay 8, 2010 07:05166717
Coptic and Egyptian [1234 words]dhimmi no moreMay 8, 2010 07:51166717
EGYPT AND PALESTINE WERE INVADED BY ARABS [210 words]IamJoseohMay 8, 2010 22:26166717
Our dear iam and baby steps [326 words]dhimmi no moreMay 9, 2010 06:50166717
Arabs in the literary sources before 500BCE part deux [122 words]dhimmi no moreMay 9, 2010 07:17166717
This time three for the price of one [182 words]dhimmi no moreMay 10, 2010 07:01166717
ALL YOUR SUBMISSIONS ARE USELESS. [416 words]IamJosehMay 11, 2010 03:16166717
ANOTHER FCTICIOUS NAME. [329 words]IamJosehMay 11, 2010 03:42166717
THE HEBREW BIBLE PROVES THE REVERSE. [520 words]IamJosephMay 11, 2010 06:43166717
And speaking of "greasy" [60 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 06:35166717
Let me repeat it one more time [96 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 06:52166717
I read this as you have no answer [238 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 06:55166717
Much more comedy [341 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 07:05166717
And speaking of the Negev [139 words]dhimmi no moreMay 12, 2010 07:20166717
LOGICAL HISTORY DISPROVES YOU. [517 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 21:48166717
ARAB & ARABIAN ARE NOT EQUAL. [212 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 22:10166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [198 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 22:38166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [401 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 22:43166717
ALL YOUR SUBMISSIONS ARE USELESS. [304 words]IamJosephMay 12, 2010 23:17166717
The word for today is bizarre and more evidence from 'En 'Avdot [513 words]dhimmi no moreMay 13, 2010 07:12166717
The Greeks are coming.... the Greeks are coming.... for the readers read and laugh [321 words]dhimmi no moreMay 13, 2010 07:46166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [679 words]IamJosephMay 13, 2010 22:44166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [891 words]IamJosephMay 13, 2010 23:12166717
Egypt was in Arabia? Really? [39 words]dhimmi no moreMay 14, 2010 06:26166717
Our dear iam has nothing to say [131 words]dhimmi no moreMay 14, 2010 06:34166717
More delusions from our dear iam part trois [277 words]dhimmi no moreMay 14, 2010 06:43166717
Arabs in the literary sources and the Arabic language [805 words]dhimmi no moreMay 14, 2010 07:13166717
Incorrect deflection. [214 words]IamJosephMay 14, 2010 22:24166717
ARAB IS NEW; ARABIAN IS OLD. [1205 words]IamJosephMay 14, 2010 23:03166717
NO ARAB RACE PRE-500 BCE. [607 words]IamJosephMay 14, 2010 23:16166717
The mother of all gems revisited [1221 words]dhimmi no moreMay 15, 2010 07:38166717
More from 'En Avdot inscription [110 words]dhimmi no moreMay 15, 2010 07:48166717
So when did Egypt move out of Arabia to its present location in Africa? [199 words]dhimmi no moreMay 15, 2010 11:42166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [437 words]IamJosephMay 16, 2010 21:25166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [632 words]IamJosephMay 17, 2010 20:01166717
The Islamic concept of al-jahiliyya and our dear iam and it seems that Arabic became a real language as back as 1500BCE [908 words]dhimmi no moreMay 18, 2010 07:57166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [1652 words]IamJosephMay 18, 2010 20:03166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [931 words]IamJosephMay 19, 2010 20:20166717
Reading the Qur'an [506 words]dhimmi no moreMay 22, 2010 08:37166717
More nonsense from our dear iam [435 words]dhimmi no moreMay 22, 2010 12:01166717
ARAB-ISLAMIC MYTHS [1222 words]IamJosephMay 23, 2010 22:43166717
Hebrew writings are authentic and contemporary. [100 words]IamJosephMay 23, 2010 22:51166717
The letter V in Egyptian/Coptic [50 words]dhimmi no moreMay 25, 2010 18:07166717
BOGUS PROOF OF HISTORY. [212 words]IamJosephMay 27, 2010 03:35166717
2HUMANITY HAS BEEN FOOLED BY A FALSIFIED HISTORY. [951 words]IamJosephMay 27, 2010 21:07166717
1The second letter in the Coptic alphabet is Beta also Veta [538 words]dhimmi no moreJun 1, 2010 18:41166717
ANOTHER BLUNDER EXPOSED. [384 words]IamJosephJun 2, 2010 20:28166717
LETTER 'V' WAS INTRODUCED BY THE HEBREW WRITINGS. [184 words]IamJosephJun 2, 2010 20:41166717
More drivel [220 words]dhimmi no moreJun 4, 2010 18:28166717
Our dear iam the letter V in the language of Egypt and those pesky Copts and the long version [1165 words]dhimmi no moreJun 5, 2010 15:35166717
BOGUS MANIPULATIONS ARE NOT PROOFS. [394 words]IamJosephJun 5, 2010 19:30166717
More ignorance [1568 words]dhimmi no moreJun 6, 2010 08:33166717
THERE IS NOTHING SACRED ABOUT FALSEHOODS. [1911 words]IamJosephJun 7, 2010 22:39166717
MORE ERRORS REPEATED. [961 words]IamJosephJun 9, 2010 00:31166717
More drivel and the saga goes on and on [181 words]dhimmi no moreJun 9, 2010 05:55166717
The pesky Copts again and the letter B and V and F [175 words]dhimmi no moreJun 9, 2010 18:02166717
WRONG AGAIN. [232 words]IamJosephJun 9, 2010 19:17166717
and who really created Allah [70 words]dhimmi no moreJun 11, 2010 18:25166717
THE FALSEHOODS OF MUSLIMS. [370 words]IamJosephJun 11, 2010 20:45166717
The Aristotelian problem and the so called tawheed [54 words]dhimmi no moreJun 14, 2010 06:24166717
DID ISLAM CREATE JERUSALEM - OR COMMIT ROBBERY AND DENIAL? [250 words]IamJosephJun 14, 2010 23:28166717
Who really created the creator? [13 words]dhimmi no moreJun 17, 2010 06:10166717
ISLAM WILL COLLAPSE UNLESS THE BALFOUR IS RESTORED. [299 words]IamJosephJun 17, 2010 21:58166717
You still did not answer [115 words]dhimmi no moreJun 20, 2010 06:49166717
4Old civilizations and their languages are not conjured away and Beer-root aka Beirut [1033 words]dhimmi no moreJun 19, 2011 07:52166717
The word ANOCHI [80 words]Victor HakimDec 18, 2014 13:46166717
1Syriac and Lebanese/Syrian Arabic [11 words]dhimmi no moreDec 20, 2015 12:29166717
Egyptian colloquial Arabic [48 words]Arthur GoldschmidtDec 31, 2009 21:39166643
Thank you very much [21 words]Anne-Marie DelcambreDec 31, 2009 11:46166623
Thank You [36 words]Becky KivakDec 30, 2009 19:45166585
ironic juxtaposition [21 words]philipDec 30, 2009 13:14166562
Thank you for the grammar! [33 words]Michael TownsDec 30, 2009 10:51166550

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS. by IamJoseph

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)