AnoChi and the language of Egypt and anok pe or ang pe
Reader comment on item: "An Arabist's Guide to Egyptian Colloquial" Now Online
Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Apr 26, 2010 at 07:36
Our dear iam you need to take a deep breath
>the word ano is Arabic ana or I. How come you did not know that?
>False. In arabic it is 'ANA';
Hello: you do not know any Arabic right?
> in Hebrew it is 'ANI'.
Hello: Are you also aware that in some Arabic language dialects ani also means I !!! Oh let me guess: they stole it too right?
And you know what? you did not even get it I can read Arabic in your Ano chi and I read it as I'm or I live! Now do you get it?
>ANO is ancient Egyptian; ANO CHI is 'I AM' in Egyptian,
No it is not. So let me help you I'm or I am in Egyptian means
Anok Pe (or Coptic alpha Nu O kappa Pi Ey)
1. I urge the readers to check "The Gospel of Thomas" check verse 61 where it says "I am ..." and this is in Sahidic Coptic which would have been the dialect of the Pharaohs
2. Check Crum dictionary
3. And here is your bonus from Bohairic Coptic and for this see Nabil Mattar's book "Bohairic Coptic" and for this see page 176 and I am which in Egyptian language is I the one or I am and it is
4. Anok can also be Ang
So did your Allah say anok pe? Let me guess he did not
>its first transliteration being in the Hebrew 10 Commandments. That the Hebrew gives the correct contemporary word of this ancient language,
Really? Hello: I'm in Egyptian language means anok Pe and not ano chi and as a matter of fact I can read your ano chi as Arabic ana hay or I'm or I live so how do you explain that?
And did it cross your mind why would your Allah use Egyptian words in a Hebrew text? Any guesses?
> and ancient Egypt having no connection with Arabs or Arabic,
> is a remarkable proof of authenticity of the Hebrew, which is not seen with the Arab claims.
What is remarkable here is that you are a demagogue and no more
>Between the ancient Egyptian ANO
Hello: I in Egyptian means Anok or ang but not ano
>and the Hebrew ANI - there is a long array of Hebrew writings and Hebrew history - but no Arabic writings till 400 CE - and no ARAB race till 500 BCE. The Arabs stole today's Egypt from other peoples which are much older than them, includng the Coptics. The land of the Kurds and the Jews were also stolen, as is Pakistan and Bangladesh.
>The Muslims have been fed with false teachings, while barring them from outside knowledge of history. Then now come up with total belief with a host of false claims:THE JEWISH TEMPLE WAS A ZIONIST MYTH.JEWS ARE ALIENS IN ARABIA AND NEVER POSSESSED A SOVERIEGN HOMELAND IN PALESTINE.ABRAHAM AND MOSES WERE MUSLIMS.These are among the worst historical falsehoods in the world today, but held as truth by Muslims. Muslims also believe the following is historical truth:THE BLOOD LIBELSTHE PROTOCOLS OF ZION.THE HOLOCAUST WAS A ZIONIST MYTH TO MAKE MONEY.THAT ISRAEL HAS NO HISTORY AND IS A RESULT OF THE HOLOCAUST - WHICH OF COURSE WAS ALSO A ZIONIST MYTH.THAT MUSLIM ARABS ARE 'PALESTINEANS' - WHEN THIS NAME WAS DUMPED BY EUROPE ON THE JEWISH HOMELAND [JUDEA] - NOT ANY ARAB OR ISLAMIC HOMELAND.There is a legal tort one must have 'CLEAN HANDS' when making claims.That Arab Muslims have no connection to Abraham or Moses, via biological or belief premises - is proven by the fact the Pre-Islamic Arabs never observed a single Hebrew belief before Islam emerged. But the Jews did! That the pre-Islamic Arabs hated Jews and Judaism before Islam emerged - is proof this hatred is not religion related:This hatred was not from the Quran but inserted into the Quran by a pre-Quran position. So get over it and cleanse your hatreds and false teachings. The truth is, Jews have never stolen another peoples' land in all their 4000 year history - evidencing exactly the reverse of Islamic history - and there is no such thing as belief in God when dishonesty is its foundation.THOU SHALT NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESSTHOU SHALT NOT STEALTHOU SHALL NOT COVET WHAT IS NOT YOURSTHOU SHALT NOT FOLLOW A CORRUPT MULTITUDE.
I agree with you here but what does this have to do with the fact that EA is a reality that only fools can deny? Surprise me with an answer
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".
Reader comments (191) on this item
Comment on this item
Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes