|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Flawed ReasoningReader comment on item: [Beslan Atrocity:] They're Terrorists - Not Activists Submitted by Justin Lannoye (United States), Sep 8, 2004 at 15:26 ... While I would agree that anyone that targets innocent civilians for political purposes to be a terrorist, then we must include everyone, regardless of their background and regardless of their sponsor, within that definition. Otherwise, the term becomes a meaningless word used only as a propanda tool.I would prefer the media (aside from editorials) to give the facts to its readers or viewers without putting their personal spin on the news. I can then make up my own mind about who is or is not a terrorist. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
|
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||