|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
The meaning of "Terrorism"Reader comment on item: [Beslan Atrocity:] They're Terrorists - Not Activists Submitted by Alan Green (Australia), Sep 7, 2004 at 18:49 Great roundup.I think a lot of the problem is that "terror," "terrorist," and "terrorism" are now highly loaded words. They retain original meaning, but - since 2001 - to apply the label to any group means that the only logical next course of action involves the Marines. It's almost impossible to use these words without implicitly expressing support for the War on Terror. Some of the media obviously disagrees with the War on Terror, while others agree. I think the vast majority are trying to stay neutral. Unfortunately for them, the War on Terror is just too big to not have an opinion on. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
|
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||