Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Retraction?
Reader comment on item: "Islamophobic Prejudice" and CAIR

Submitted by Tom (Serbia And Montenegro), Aug 27, 2004 at 10:04

Did any of the reporting agencies (Seattle Times, Everett Herald or CAIR) publicly retract their articles?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Daniel Pipes replies:

The newspapers fairly reported the news, have nothing to retract. CAIR is a different story; to the best of my knowledge, it has not retracted its baseless claims. But that's s.o.p. at CAIR - never apologize, never explain, stay always on the offensive.

DP

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (14) on this item

Title By Date
akram khan [37 words]girl who knowsOct 16, 2009 04:06
"Hate crimes" against the Muslims [103 words]l. DavisNov 6, 2007 10:08
I'm confused. [39 words]SoapScumBuildupMay 29, 2006 17:37
Necessary exposure [34 words]S.C PandaSep 10, 2004 05:55
Thanks [155 words]Aubrey SteeleSep 7, 2004 19:57
Some facts seem at odds with arson guilt [202 words]Roger ChapellSep 6, 2004 09:54
Framing the Victim [136 words]AJJan 30, 2007 19:58
Another case of screaming "injustice" [56 words]Rebecca WilkinAug 28, 2004 07:11
Very stupid arsonist [121 words]a.festineAug 27, 2004 15:17
The Problem With Islamic Authorities [66 words]A readerAug 27, 2004 13:20
⇒ Retraction?
[w/response] [16 words]
TomAug 27, 2004 10:04
Main Stream media. [39 words]Chard JeromeAug 25, 2004 20:18
Hate Crimes [272 words]Peter J. HerzAug 25, 2004 20:08
Boobs and dupes [74 words]Dave MitchellAug 25, 2004 17:51

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page