| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by john w. mcginley (United States), Aug 10, 2004 at 14:24
As always the information you provide performs a good service. Thank-you. I have mixed feeling about "The Saudis." "Sleazy" is the first word that comes to mind when I think of "the House of Saud." "Sleazy and hypocritical" is the phrase which comes to my mind when I think of Americans, in and out of government, (formerly in the governement) who talk one talk and walk another walk. I have never forgotten that 15 of the hackers came from rich or middle class Saudi families. Nor do I overlook the fact that some of the terrorists "captured" by the Saudis are living a pretty good and happy life. Finally, Saudis in and out of the government (and always facilitated by the the Saudi government) funded Al Qaeda for over two decades and still do. Sleazy, Sleazy, Aleazy. But in reality what can be done except for calling the Saudis on what they are doing and continully "nudging" them in the right direction. We're walking on quicksand in the middle east. Absent the "House of Saud" what in fact would happen in that land whose oil we still depend on. Plus there is an impetus for more democracy in that land by virtue of the hopes and expectations of the growing middle class in that land. The best thing we can do is to do what you just did in your article. Mercilessly PUBLICIZE the toady Americans who are funded by theSaudis and Saudi fronts. Those are my thought. John w. McGinleyNote: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| Still Timely After All These Years [38 words] | GWK | May 7, 2008 15:35 |
| Errrr... [30 words] | Errrr... | Mar 6, 2006 16:08 |
| Dependence on Islamic Countries for oil vs Energy Independence!! [65 words] | Bob Lang | Nov 21, 2004 09:10 |
| James Baker et al [32 words] | Teresa | Aug 18, 2004 19:04 |
| Typically sound comment [21 words] | Jeff Magnuson | Aug 14, 2004 02:25 |
| Saudi Arabia [84 words] | Bernard Freedman | Aug 13, 2004 08:29 |
| The Saudis' Covert P.R. Campaign- Art.2006 [18 words] | S.C.Panda | Aug 12, 2004 06:37 |
| Saudi Hospitality? [41 words] | Tim Roberts | Aug 11, 2004 21:17 |
| Excellent work Daniel [36 words] | Keith van Brunt | Aug 11, 2004 20:45 |
| Suggested Clarification [67 words] | Theodore Cohen | Aug 11, 2004 11:04 |
| The Decline and Fall of Western Civilization [133 words] | Darwin Barrett | Aug 10, 2004 20:20 |
| Thanks, but who are these PR flacks? [19 words] | Stan Brin | Aug 10, 2004 18:27 |
| Saudi covert PR campaign [165 words] | bruce schneider | Aug 10, 2004 17:54 |
| Nothing new [72 words] | Harold Fox | Aug 10, 2004 17:32 |
| State Dept merged with Big Business interests a long time ago [168 words] | patricia kimball | Aug 10, 2004 16:06 |
| ⇒ the devil you know? [251 words] | john w. mcginley | Aug 10, 2004 14:24 |
| Saudi Arabian Lip Service [92 words] | Michelle Hudson | Aug 10, 2004 14:14 |
| Saudia Arabia's Public Relations [32 words] | Nanette VanSickle | Aug 10, 2004 13:24 |
| What About The Democrats? [78 words] | yonason | Aug 10, 2004 12:06 |
| Saudi Funding of Middle East Experts [136 words] | Rory Nuriel | Aug 10, 2004 09:38 |
| The Saudis........ [63 words] | Herbert Stone | Aug 10, 2004 09:09 |