Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

the devil you know?
Reader comment on item: The Saudis' Covert P.R. Campaign

Submitted by john w. mcginley (United States), Aug 10, 2004 at 14:24

As always the information you provide performs a good service. Thank-you. I have mixed feeling about "The Saudis." "Sleazy" is the first word that comes to mind when I think of "the House of Saud." "Sleazy and hypocritical" is the phrase which comes to my mind when I think of Americans, in and out of government, (formerly in the governement) who talk one talk and walk another walk. I have never forgotten that 15 of the hackers came from rich or middle class Saudi families. Nor do I overlook the fact that some of the terrorists "captured" by the Saudis are living a pretty good and happy life. Finally, Saudis in and out of the government (and always facilitated by the the Saudi government) funded Al Qaeda for over two decades and still do. Sleazy, Sleazy, Aleazy. But in reality what can be done except for calling the Saudis on what they are doing and continully "nudging" them in the right direction. We're walking on quicksand in the middle east. Absent the "House of Saud" what in fact would happen in that land whose oil we still depend on. Plus there is an impetus for more democracy in that land by virtue of the hopes and expectations of the growing middle class in that land. The best thing we can do is to do what you just did in your article. Mercilessly PUBLICIZE the toady Americans who are funded by theSaudis and Saudi fronts. Those are my thought. John w. McGinley

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title By Date
Still Timely After All These Years [38 words]GWKMay 7, 2008 15:35
Errrr... [30 words]Errrr...Mar 6, 2006 16:08
Dependence on Islamic Countries for oil vs Energy Independence!! [65 words]Bob LangNov 21, 2004 09:10
James Baker et al [32 words]TeresaAug 18, 2004 19:04
Typically sound comment [21 words]Jeff MagnusonAug 14, 2004 02:25
Saudi Arabia [84 words]Bernard FreedmanAug 13, 2004 08:29
The Saudis' Covert P.R. Campaign- Art.2006 [18 words]S.C.PandaAug 12, 2004 06:37
Saudi Hospitality? [41 words]Tim RobertsAug 11, 2004 21:17
Excellent work Daniel [36 words]Keith van BruntAug 11, 2004 20:45
Suggested Clarification [67 words]Theodore CohenAug 11, 2004 11:04
The Decline and Fall of Western Civilization [133 words]Darwin BarrettAug 10, 2004 20:20
Thanks, but who are these PR flacks? [19 words]Stan BrinAug 10, 2004 18:27
Saudi covert PR campaign [165 words]bruce schneiderAug 10, 2004 17:54
Nothing new [72 words]Harold FoxAug 10, 2004 17:32
State Dept merged with Big Business interests a long time ago [168 words]patricia kimballAug 10, 2004 16:06
⇒ the devil you know? [251 words]john w. mcginleyAug 10, 2004 14:24
Saudi Arabian Lip Service [92 words]Michelle HudsonAug 10, 2004 14:14
Saudia Arabia's Public Relations [32 words]Nanette VanSickleAug 10, 2004 13:24
What About The Democrats? [78 words]yonasonAug 10, 2004 12:06
Saudi Funding of Middle East Experts [136 words]Rory NurielAug 10, 2004 09:38
The Saudis........ [63 words]Herbert StoneAug 10, 2004 09:09

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page