Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Renee Bouvier's Error
Reader comment on item: Laurie Mylroie's Shoddy, Loopy, Zany Theories – Exposed
in response to reader comment: Laurie Mylroie

Submitted by Laurie Mylroie (United States), Sep 30, 2009 at 13:42

Renee Bouvier,

For the second time, you are simply mistaken in your recollection that I was at Hebrew University in 1979 in any capacity whatsoever. I was not (although I did study there five years earlier.)

Furthermore, your critique of my work--the most important of which is the book, "Study of Revenge" is devoid of substance, beyond the claim that almost everyone agrees with you.. Notably, however, that work was highly praised by the prosecutor of the World Trade Center bombers, who, while he was in government was considered to be the US official who knew the most about that bombing. He described the book as "work the US government should have done." --ie the intelligence investigation into the bombing that the Clinton administration had failed to do.

Somewhat similarly, the head of New York FBI--the lead investigative agency in the World Trade Center bombing--stated, "Although we are unable to say with certainty the Iraqis were behind the bombing, that is certainly the theory accepted by most of the veteran investigators."

Laurie Mylroie


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (14) on this item

Title By Date
Laurie Mylroie - Embedded Character Flaw [475 words]Bouvier ReneeMar 20, 2009 15:22
A Fiction [38 words]Laurie MylroieAug 25, 2009 09:17
Laurie Mylroie [143 words]Renee BouvierSep 29, 2009 14:26
Laurie Mylroie vis-à-vis Daniel Pipes [410 words]Renee BouSep 29, 2009 15:23
⇒ Renee Bouvier's Error [173 words]Laurie MylroieSep 30, 2009 13:42
Laurie Mylroie is right [167 words]drzzDec 22, 2008 20:46
Where There is Smoke......OKC [68 words]Joseph FalcoJan 30, 2009 10:47
How about some substantive arguments?
[w/response] [79 words]
bill uzzleMay 29, 2008 14:09
Don't you're putting in on a thick? [78 words]Peter KauffnerMay 12, 2008 11:22
Mylroie doesn't go far enough [118 words]mitchell porterMay 10, 2008 08:55
Laurie Mylroie and the Facts [200 words]JonnyJun 25, 2008 07:23
The MSNBC story had nothing to do with Saddam [60 words]Jon HMar 3, 2009 21:58
look to the hate out of all islam countries. [109 words]Phil GreendMay 8, 2008 21:38
On the subject of the Hateful [102 words]Mikhael BareliJun 7, 2008 12:27

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page