69 million page views

Non-Muslims use Shar'i courts (let this not fool anyone)

Reader comment on item: Accept Shari'a in the West?

Submitted by P C Mani (United States), Sep 13, 2009 at 00:19

Dear Dr Pipes:

This article states that as many as 5% of the cases handled by a Shar'i court in Britain involve non-muslims. Even if it is true, let it not fool anyone. The western legal systems has its limitations. Our desire to give everyone thorough hearing and due representation in the court of law makes our legal system slow and expensive. So Shar'i court --when they are used by non-muslims-- are no different from the village councils, religious priests, marriage counsellors, and attorneys who fecilitate out-of-court settlements between feuding parties. A huge percentage of US court cases are also settled out of court -- we just don't put a religious label for what we do as a secular/civic activity.

Also, even those (muslims and non-muslims) who go to Shar'i courts propbably do so opportunistically. A person who has stolen something or is accused of adultery will probably not liek to be tried by a Shar'i court because s/he would like due representation and would like to avoid inhuman, cruel and unusual punishments.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (15) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
The problem with 'Sharia Court' is the 'Sharia' and not the 'Court' [768 words]PrashantAug 4, 2018 12:03244090
2al-Shari'a al-Islamiyya [390 words]dhimmi no moreAug 6, 2018 15:13244090
Bible abuse [57 words]kaariganSep 25, 2010 06:26178674
when will they ever learn... [27 words]donvanMay 11, 2010 15:22172579
Tribal tribunals incivilized world!!! [93 words]Muslimk***May 10, 2010 03:52172485
Non-Muslims use Shar'i courts (let this not fool anyone) [173 words]P C ManiSep 13, 2009 00:19161454
Sharia in India [71 words]AjayMay 10, 2010 09:12161454
London flashpoint [240 words]Andrew KyleAug 1, 2009 07:41159507
Superstition based policing? [32 words]EdSJul 26, 2009 18:32159320
United Nations attempting to silence all speech against Islam [502 words]dianeDec 2, 2008 00:22144264
Sharia Law [69 words]Egil UlateigAug 31, 2007 11:32107380
1Australian PM John Howard gave the right response re.imposing sharia. [48 words]M.D'SouzaMay 29, 2007 20:5095178
1Your sentiment is right but the danger is deeper [79 words]George PAug 12, 2009 22:4195178
Forget it [59 words]David W. LincolnMay 28, 2007 16:2095048
Necessary precautions [42 words]DAVID R. GROESBECKMay 28, 2007 07:4895002

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Non-Muslims use Shar'i courts (let this not fool anyone) by P C Mani

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)