Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site
Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search

Superstition based policing?
Reader comment on item: Accept Shari'a in the West?

Submitted by EdS (Canada), Jul 26, 2009 at 18:32

Superstition based policing, now I have heard everything. The people who would permit this are insane. Superstitious belief is a personal matter. There should be one law and one system of policing.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (9) on this item

Title By Date
Non-Muslims use Shar'i courts (let this not fool anyone) [173 words]P C ManiSep 13, 2009 00:19
London flashpoint [240 words]Andrew KyleAug 1, 2009 07:41
⇒ Superstition based policing? [32 words]EdSJul 26, 2009 18:32
United Nations attempting to silence all speech against Islam [502 words]dianeDec 2, 2008 00:22
Sharia Law [69 words]Egil UlateigAug 31, 2007 11:32
Australian PM John Howard gave the right response re.imposing sharia. [48 words]M.D'SouzaMay 29, 2007 20:50
↔ Your sentiment is right but the danger is deeper [79 words]George PAug 12, 2009 22:41
Forget it [59 words]David W. LincolnMay 28, 2007 16:20
Necessary precautions [42 words]DAVID R. GROESBECKMay 28, 2007 07:48

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page