Kreidie getting greedy?

Submitted by Lloyd Lionel Klein (United States), Jul 6, 2004 at 11:28

You wrote "How, then, did this anti-counterterrorism, anti-Bush, anti-Ashcroft, anti-FBI figure exactly help in "identifying, preventing and disrupting acts of terrorism"? Presented with this record of Kreidie's remarks, the Philadelphia FBI office declined to comment."

My comment: perhaps he was helpful, by protesting too much.

Maybe the spooks figured that if he wasn't helping them, they would destroy his credibility with his islamic colleagues, by suggesting he did?

The FBI is hardly a model of transparency.

Still, I'm satisfied that on average pointing out these inconsistencies does more good than harm.

Keep it up.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".