|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Return to deterrence: correct!Reader comment on item: The Threat to Israel's Existence Submitted by Abu Nudnik (Canada), Jul 15, 2009 at 12:03 Up til 1991, Israel's standing policy was to hit back. Every attack was met with a counterattack. No exceptions. In 1991, Geo. Bush Sr. convinced the Israelis to stay out of the FIrst Gulf War. In exchange for giving up its deterrent policy, Israelis were given the Patriot missile defence system. That was when Israel was put back on their heels. They have been there every since. Deterrence: immediate and without any exception, must be brought back. Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||