45 readers online now

98,675 comments by 26,222 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Regarding Mujahideen-e Khalq
Reader comment on item: Washington Puzzles over the Mujahedeen-e Khalq

Submitted by Debanjan Banerjee (India), May 11, 2009 at 20:51

Dr. Pipes,

It will be interesting to know your viewpoint on this particular group called Mujahideen-e Khalq which is nothing but a group of Communist-mided secular terrorists albeit with an anti-Iranian attitude.

As a supporter of democracy and human rights do you think US should use this group against the Islamic republic of Iran ? Don't you think it will be counterproductive for US to work with a group such as this one ?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Daniel Pipes replies:

I disagree and have written several times on the MeK explaining my views, including in this very blog.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (8) on this item

Title By Date
Now, should Israel trust Clinton's umbrella [60 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDAug 12, 2009 11:05
⇒ Regarding Mujahideen-e Khalq
[w/response] [74 words]
Debanjan BanerjeeMay 11, 2009 20:51
The MeK is a secular alternative -- they deserve our benign support at least [143 words]Charles MartelAug 13, 2009 11:20
Remember Mossadeq [121 words]Charles MartelAug 16, 2009 05:34
I met these folks [518 words]russell wohlfordAug 24, 2006 11:20
Read some history [436 words]The Historian...Nov 19, 2006 12:49
response to "The Historian" [1093 words]russell wohlfordNov 22, 2006 02:40
Response to "the Historian" [305 words]RSTAug 9, 2009 00:06

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.