Daniel J. Pipes

25 readers online now  |  62 million page views

120,172 comments by 30,669 readers

Go to Mobile Site

not surprising

Reader comment on item: Islam in American Textbooks
in response to reader comment: To Job Haddaway : Aya 4.89

Submitted by the Grand Infide of Kaffiristan (Australia), Mar 26, 2009 at 06:56

Mohammed, the ever willing believer writes:

".......
"If they turn back from islam kill them wherever you find them. All quranic authorities agree that apsotates must be killed according to thjis aya and the hadith Bukhari4-52-260"Kill any one who leaves islam", and that is the sharia law and is practised in all countries who follow sharia. "

Well then, again, just as it's OK to wait 3 years to sleep with a nine year old child - it must be OK to kill anyone who wakes up and discovers that Islam is not the true path. It says so in the hadith - so it must be so. Who can question that sort of logic?

"Allah said the same thing in old testament. ..."

hmmm,don't recall any Allah in the Old Testament or the Gospels for that matter. I met a girl called 'Alla' in Russia once though. Probably not related. I do recall Christ saying he'd come to replace the old Mosaic law with a new more advanced one though. Funny how that isn't covered in the Quran isn't it?

"Are you trying to say Allah exempted the apostates who had treaties? "

No, I don't think so. I think he's trying to say that the whole apostate thing and the vengeful deity went out the window once people twigged onto the idea that God was all about forgiveness, love and forbearance, light and consciousness. It did away with the necessity of going through scriptures looking for loopholes or creating new outlandish 'scriptures' to justify aberrant behaviour .

".Quran does not have any sequence, chronology or context, ..."

I totally agree with you and for good measure I'll add a few more - consistency and consequence & relevance.

"...and most ayas are idividual and their meanings are not necessarily connected with adjacent ayas. "

so no rational sequence? Could explain a lot of things - and make it harder to justify the excuse that things are taken 'out of context'.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here

ADVERTISEMENTS

History News Network
eXTReMe Tracker
Shop BestofVegas for your next Vegas Vacation

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes