69 million page views

Islam in reality means full punishment for women while men get off scott free.

Reader comment on item: Atiq Malik, British Politician, Calls for Stoning Adulterous Muslim Women
in response to reader comment: Sharia Laws:

Submitted by kman (United States), Mar 6, 2009 at 01:01

I never hear of any man in a Muslim nation getting the hundred lashes, but they are relentlessly used against women. As for "witnesses", the "four" is bogus, too as women are considered only worth half of a man's witness. Any backing for a woman's defense is pressured into switching loyalties wether lie or truth.

Let's take for example the woman in Pakistan who was offered a ride to her home by an aquaintence and then abducted. She was repeatedly raped over several days by her abductor and his friends. When she later became pregnant, she was prosecuted (100 lashes) for fornication. She was imprisoned until she had given birth to the child and then given the 100 lashes. Meanwhile, her rapists got off totally free as is common in Muslim nations. A man has only to accuse a woman of being "loose" and his word is taken as law, especially when multiple rapists are involved - well, there you go, you now have your four witnesses who lie in collusion.

Sharia is conveniently followed in whatever way suits the males of the population.

Your mode of intimidation is commonly used throughout the world as you do Malik. You immediately start charging your accusers in other publications with illegally persecuting you in order to stop any dissent. Your tactics are deceptive, slimy as are all of Islam's. When you learn to speak with truth, you will attain some modicum of respect instead the fear of retaliation you depend on.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (20) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2Are they serious? [130 words]Phil GhidinelliJun 21, 2010 09:21174619
2BARBARIC REMARKS, stoning of women [53 words]FRANCIS WHELANApr 14, 2009 22:03153898
RE. Love Hope & Inspiration [199 words]AbdulMay 13, 2009 12:39153898
2WIll Muslims opt for Sharia [110 words]Pradeep MohantyMar 23, 2009 03:02152621
2Re. Will Muslims opt for Sharia? [240 words]Phil GhidinelliJun 22, 2010 13:10152621
1This is surreal [135 words]NG LyndMar 13, 2009 16:00152229
1TRUST YOUR INSTINCTS.. [120 words]donvanMar 16, 2009 13:54152229
1The Circus goes on! Islamists encouraged by UK Government [1431 words]Guy Leven-TorresMar 11, 2009 04:49152079
3Let those who want Sharia law return to countries that practice it [108 words]Michael KurtzigMar 5, 2009 18:03151710
WAKE UP [170 words]SOLOMONAug 24, 2009 11:05151710
1Good [18 words]Phil GhidinelliJun 14, 2011 07:24151710
1Incredible! [49 words]mannyMar 5, 2009 13:44151698
Sharia Laws: [682 words]Atiq MalikFeb 28, 2009 16:39151363
6Duplicitious and dangerous [140 words]TMMar 2, 2009 22:12151363
To Mr. Atiq Malik [29 words]Mohamed EljahmiMar 3, 2009 23:43151363
3Islam would never give us a choice that is the difference between democarcy and Sharia. [20 words]Michael KurtzigMar 5, 2009 18:08151363
3Islam in reality means full punishment for women while men get off scott free. [249 words]kmanMar 6, 2009 01:01151363
2al-munafiq al-kabeer [935 words]dhimmi no moreMar 9, 2009 18:28151363
Hypocrisy [186 words]Matthew RobertsApr 9, 2013 05:21151363
3Deception [30 words]AnonFeb 28, 2009 14:30151357

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Islam in reality means full punishment for women while men get off scott free. by kman

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)