Submitted by B N Gururaj(India), Jan 27, 2009 at 05:01
The development envisaged is quite predictable. First, muslims enter European countries as oppressed migrants. They form their own ghettos. Next they procreate profusely as though there is no tomorrow. The ghetto expands. In the usual Islamic tradition, there are demands and demands and demands for privileges and recognition of rights. If these are not conceded, there will be violence, attacks on majoriatrian community. Eventually, the majority gives in by ceding a part of their land. This was the way Pakistan was carved out of India, after nearly thuosand years' Hindu resistance.
In India, contiguous muslim zones like East Pakistan and West Pakistan took several centuries to develop. Once the muslims formed the majority in these contiguous regions, others were reduced to Dhimmi status by force. West and East Pakistan were carved out of Indian territory. Now, due to influx of ilelgal Bangladesh immigrants, West Bengal, and Assam are facing the same danger, where the illegal immigrants have altered the demographic pattern itself. It is only a matter of time when a third Islamic Republic is carved out of India.
Similarly, Europe is hurtling towards the same fate. If the city State concept is pursued, there will be several Pakistans all over Europe. Rest assured: Islamic imperialism will not be satisfied until entire continent is gobbled up. Giving city-States is only the beginning of concessions. India also has such pockets of Muslim majority, such as Malapuram district in the State of Kerala.
Ultimately, where the sword cannot achieve these objectives, Muslim procreation will achieve the same result in a couple of centuries. Demography works where sword fails.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.