Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Minority Favoritism and the US / US Military
Reader comment on item: The Secret Pictures of Senior Airman Ahmad al Halabi

Submitted by Jailer (United States), Apr 6, 2004 at 01:21

Since the 60s, there has been in the military, a reluctance to judge personnel of the minorities the same when dealing with minority crime. This is both in the military as well as civilian left. It actually goes back to the Watts Riots many years before in CA.
The military has been lenient in many Courtss Martials fearing that the guilty party will scream prejudice which is often a ploy of the guilty. The same happens in the civilian life within the Jurisprudence system as well as the Correctional System. The US Government as well as the US Military are afraid to act upon the minorities who have broken the laws, rules and ordinances.

This is a fact of life in the US. In the case of this traitor US Army Captain James (Yousef") Yee if the specificatiions to the charges were solid, that sorry individual should have been charged with Sedition and if the courts martial had done it's duty, the sorry S.O.B. would either be in Leavenworth of better still, facing a death sentance. We are very quick to Charge and find guilty, an individual who is found guilty of an alleged offense and made a scapegoat in order for the US Government to be looked upon favorably by our enemy.

Are we still wondering why for so long a period of time, our military was lacking volunteers? Look at the way they are being treated now and see why retention may be a problem. The US Sailor, Soldier, Airman or Marine will go in harms way without much prodding but this person cannot stand to be wronged or dumped on by his leaders

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title By Date
Re: comment, "Interesting try to twist angles" [44 words]AhmedSep 7, 2004 15:01
Interesting try to twist angles [28 words]SarahAug 28, 2004 02:40
Steganography for encoded messages on the web site? [220 words]Jimmy Joe MeekerApr 12, 2004 23:07
Question about an earlier suspected terrorist [86 words]Ilona MelstradsApr 12, 2004 17:59
Site already 'unavailable' [43 words]Tova MatteroApr 8, 2004 19:20
hidden pictures [60 words]r.d. kelleyApr 6, 2004 15:38
⇒ Minority Favoritism and the US / US Military [275 words]JailerApr 6, 2004 01:21
Should have declared war on Islamists [89 words]Robert BoltonApr 5, 2004 22:48
Pipes is Right on This One [133 words]Mark DankofApr 5, 2004 17:09
military infiltration [106 words]donvanApr 5, 2004 12:15
Appreciation of article [33 words]Frank L. KorteApr 3, 2004 09:19
Defense of those who do not believe in democracy? [42 words]S.C.PandaApr 1, 2004 05:17
Arabic language translators. [62 words]MalvinaMar 31, 2004 07:42
Tip o' the Iceberg [124 words]Darwin BarrettMar 29, 2004 17:55
RE: Guantanomo Bay Spy Update [59 words]CherylMar 29, 2004 16:57
al-Qa`idah Infiltration? [35 words]Timothy FurnishMar 29, 2004 12:58
A question of Loyality [25 words]KamathMar 29, 2004 08:12

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page