Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site
Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search

As usual,
Reader comment on item: The education of Thomas Friedman

Submitted by Marcia Peters (United States), Mar 10, 2004 at 23:03

Daniel Pipes nails it neatly and consisely. Keep up your good work.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (12) on this item

Title By Date
Globlalization, Jobs, Stem-cell Research(Solution) [322 words]DJSep 29, 2006 07:07
The education of Thomas Friedman [46 words]steven LJun 16, 2006 17:22
Friedman:ECONOMICS TRUMPS POLITICS - still selling nonsense [217 words]Jeff BercovitchDec 29, 2005 08:11
↔ Explore the lost worlds in the Flat World of Thomas Friedman [632 words]Ray TapajnaDec 4, 2006 23:09
Friedman on Daily Show [149 words]ShaneApr 23, 2005 07:36
Friedman's theory [91 words]Hilary RussellJan 31, 2005 23:01
⇒ As usual, [12 words]Marcia PetersMar 10, 2004 23:03
Stockholm Syndrom [34 words]Lawrence GoldbergMar 4, 2004 19:56
Friedman's "Golden Arches Theory" [111 words]J. KanatzarApr 21, 2003 04:05
America's Iron Fist Minus A Silk Glove [96 words]Cliff McKenzieNov 6, 2002 12:54
Friedman's Flaw [70 words]Herb WeitzOct 9, 2002 10:03
American Academia [93 words]em griffethSep 27, 2002 21:41

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page