Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Ascent/Descent
Reader comment on item: Iran in Crisis

Submitted by David Vosbikian (United States), Jul 24, 2002 at 09:23

In a prior article: "A New Round of Anger and Humiliation: Islam after 9/11"

You wrote:

"If militant Islam achieved the acme of its achievement on 9/11, then 11/9 could be when the movement began its descent. The first date marked the peak of militant Islam, its day of greatest success in humiliating the West, causing death and panic. The second date, when the Taliban lost their first major city, marked an apparent turning point, with the West finding its resolve and its strength to deal with its new main enemy."

Throughout the entire article you point to many examples around the world backing up this opinion. Yet, in today's article you write:

"Militant Islam is on the ascendant almost everywhere around the globe - except in the nation that has experienced it longest and knows it best. In Iran, it is on the defensive and perhaps in retreat."

I prefer the former to the latter. Which is it in your opinion?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (30) on this item

Title By Date
President Ahmadinejad [34 words]Sanam GhoddoussiAug 29, 2005 18:56
Mind your race [72 words]AhuraNov 24, 2004 09:45
Secularism v. Theocracy [149 words]Sanam GhoddoussiMar 9, 2004 15:53
Chris you say that as if Iranians are Arabs! [42 words]Some GuyAug 7, 2003 11:39
How many Zaraostrians are there in Iran anyway? [16 words]Some GuyAug 7, 2003 11:33
Fascism, Communism and Militant Islam [226 words]Gabriel GrossoJan 3, 2003 09:03
In response to A. Kaffir's comment [83 words]Nima VokshoriNov 10, 2002 19:35
Return to the Zoroastrian Roots [105 words]A. KaffirAug 4, 2002 15:44
A Ray of Hope [122 words]Arlene SwartzmanJul 30, 2002 15:36
Correct analysis by Dr. Pipes [23 words]Mike HarariJul 28, 2002 03:21
A comfortable spot somewhere between [68 words]Melvin A. FechterJul 25, 2002 19:43
A glimmer of hope? [62 words]Rick SteenoJul 24, 2002 23:22
Dr. Pipes is correct on Iran [122 words]The chafing discontent of millionsJul 24, 2002 19:51
Plenty of false dawns before [223 words]PatrickJul 24, 2002 11:56
⇒ Ascent/Descent [157 words]David VosbikianJul 24, 2002 09:23
Democrats vs fundamentalists vs militants in Iran? [260 words]Adam BurczykJul 23, 2002 21:02
Deluded [200 words]EklektosJul 23, 2002 20:21
We still have a long journey ahead [102 words]HabibJul 23, 2002 18:54
What the Free World can do to fight Militant Islam [82 words]N. KhanJul 23, 2002 17:49
Refreshing look at Iran's evolution [83 words]Debbie Wallis LandauJul 23, 2002 16:33
What about the other Islamic tyrannies? [226 words]LB DeyoJul 23, 2002 13:19
Where's Bani-Sadr when they need him? [63 words]Gilbert SchwartzJul 23, 2002 13:18
Prejudice vs. Truth [160 words]Radwan Abu-IssaJul 23, 2002 13:00
As Iran Goes, So Goes Militant Islam [322 words]ChrisJul 23, 2002 12:48
Iran's aid to the Palestinians [157 words]Lila B. ReismanJul 23, 2002 11:47
IRAN Has Nowhere To Hide [80 words]Glenn KlotzJul 23, 2002 11:38
Is It 1989 All Over Again? [116 words]PeterJul 23, 2002 11:07
Aha! [120 words]P KrenkelJul 23, 2002 09:26
Dare to Hope? [92 words]Margery FeinsteinJul 23, 2002 08:43
Democracy and Islam [253 words]WalterJul 23, 2002 07:27

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page