Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Esposito's Speech reveals what he thinks about his school of thought- read again what he said.
Reader comment on item: John Esposito and Me

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Sep 26, 2008 at 17:47

Esposito Gap in speech reveals his nature and what he thinks about himself.

No wonder why so easily he elevates Dr. Pipes.

***

Esposito said:

"…You have myself and others who think: roughly …in the same school of thought"…

According to http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=roughly, may I make a simple observation based upon the nature of the "innocently" used adverb by Esposito?

He does not have problems with English, meaning that he really means what he has in mind and understands the nature of the words, right- he is a "teacher"?

"…You have myself and others who think:

Irregularly –unevenly-with violence characterization-with infraction of the rules-violently disturbed –violently agitated as in a violently irregular motion- tempestuously- harshly-unmannerly – rudely- disorderly or riotously like a mob and yet,

Unpleasantly- untastely-in a lack of culture or refinement- without refinements-requiring exertion or strength rather than intelligence or skill-not elaborated, perfected, or corrected; unpolished-made or done without any attempt at exactness, completeness, or thoroughness…

"…Myself and others….in the same school of thought…"

"..And you have a second school of thought"…

Good Job Esposito. He does not even need to attack Dr. Pipes to make others think whether or not they want to be your students. Who would want in sane mind to take classes with a "master of thought" with any of the above characteristics?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title By Date
How long should we endure this? [132 words]Arif Jayish Al AmirkiOct 13, 2008 19:36
Is there an end to Islamic appologists [125 words]KafirOct 9, 2008 09:43
⇒ Esposito's Speech reveals what he thinks about his school of thought- read again what he said. [218 words]YnnatchkahSep 26, 2008 17:47
"Islamists Make Me a Movie Star." -- Daniel Pipes' Weblog [94 words]Rochelle MichaelsFeb 18, 2008 10:40
Esposito and his juvenile behaviour.Star Wars..Yes.... [89 words]YnnatchkahFeb 16, 2008 16:46
Professor For Sale [55 words]sheik yer'mamiSep 30, 2007 18:55
Esposito [63 words]Gabby (from Australia)Sep 29, 2008 07:26
Exposing Esposito [267 words]sheik yer'mamiSep 30, 2007 15:41
Continue exposing Esposito for what he is: a blatant apologist for Islam [81 words]Dennis GravesDec 25, 2007 19:34
John Esposito Lecture CCWA 1/22/09 [43 words]julieJan 23, 2009 07:09
Esposito [456 words]Ashamed HoyaSep 20, 2007 23:43
JOHN ESPOSITO [87 words]JON PURIZHANSKYSep 20, 2007 19:40
John Esposito and travel [53 words]dhimmi no moreSep 17, 2007 17:50
Doubt about his acceptance. [331 words]YnnatchkahSep 17, 2007 22:33
And, The "Award" goes to John Esposito, this quarter. [277 words]YnnatchkahSep 17, 2007 02:02
Qui non proficit deficit [302 words]jennifer solisSep 16, 2007 14:56
Loved what you wrote, Jennifer Solis. [161 words]YnnatchkahSep 17, 2007 02:28
JS response [49 words]W. June PedigoOct 18, 2007 19:01

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page