Submitted by doomslayer (United States), Aug 12, 2008 at 12:53
It appears that our FBI and CIA agencies have little or no knowledge of Islam and of the Muslim mindset.
Islam has a term "Taqaiya" which means Concealing of Faith , Holy deception. It is to believe in something but say something else......double speech is justifiable in their eyes and The Shia say there is great reward in lying if it will help promote their religion and cause. In light of this how can our agencies hire those that follow Islam.
The religion is not one of peace despite what some Imans will say. History and not mere words from some bear this out. Islam has a history from its' inception of hate, warfare, injustices, brutality etc. It is a well know fact that Saudi Arabia and it's most radical narrow, sectarian, and divisive Muslim sect, Wahabism is spending $100 BILLION dollars to export it's theology worldwide especially in the UK and the US. Colleges are given monies for Arabic Studies but classes actually promote Islam and champion Anti-Semitism. They are building Mosques which are nothing more than trainning centers for jihad. Imans here in the US have declared their intent to overthrow us, to destroy us from within, to change our government and make Sharia Law the law of the land.
During W W II Japanese and German Americans were closely scrutinized and rightly so. The security of our nations was at stake.What makes this internal threat any different? Thomas jefferson had a copy of the Koran not because he admired it but because he wanted to know "the enemy" in order to best deal with the Muslim piracy off the coast of Africa. I would suggest that the FBI and CIA read the Quran along with it's abrogated verses and the Wahabi version as well in order to better equip themselves. Hopefully then they will adjust their hiring practices not to conform to the political correctness of the day but to secure men and women who have no greater interest than to protect our country and the democracy and freedoms we enjoy.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
