Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Obligations to Allies, Big & Small
Reader comment on item: Will Washington Betray Anti-Regime Iranians?

Submitted by Rubicon (United States), Jul 16, 2008 at 20:03

America, to her eternal shame, abandoned many allies when we were forced by Congress to leave Vietnam. Worse is that once the Democratically controlled Congress decided to stop funding the South Vietnamese government, any and all protections of those domestic groups and individuals in Vietnam who had assisted us when we were fighting there, lost the protection of the South Vietnamese army and government. The oppression and/or slaughter of those who were identified as having assisted America, was swift and harsh. Some fled to the seas. Many died, a few successfully reached neutral territories, while still others fled to Cambodia or Thailand. To this day Americans who fought beside the indigenous Montagnard, speak of them with respect and still feel shame when they remember how we abandoned them.

While the MEK do not rise to the same level as the Montagnard, they have been allies and they have assisted American troops in their efforts. Add to this their renunciation of terrorism and we have a group ripe for slaughter if we walk away and do nothing for them.

So, while I am NOT one who favors open immigration and in fact support serious border security along with interior enforcement of our immigration laws, the MEK might just a group who we should offer asylum. We did not seriously do this for the Montagnard and the result was terrible. We have many times walked away from those who have gone out on a limb for us. Perhaps this time, honor will be respected and we will do the right thing.

This would be one immigration exception I would support!


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (38) on this item

Title By Date
About Ahmadinejad nuclear intentions [358 words]worriedSep 12, 2008 09:17
Will USA betray ARI [135 words]IfrahimMar 8, 2009 13:47
Iranians need to tell us what freedom is... [333 words]A Befuddled American VoterAug 5, 2008 15:01
I beg you, hold back [344 words]Peter HerzSep 4, 2008 16:12
Betrayal work of Washington [151 words]HCAug 4, 2008 17:49
Hard to trust Washington! [180 words]SohrabAug 5, 2008 22:24
Betrayal Work of Washington / Hard To trust USA [153 words]HCAug 6, 2008 16:07
Iranian Resistance: The only solution to Iran problem [84 words]AlexJul 26, 2008 16:10
i prefer Mollahs to MEK [115 words]zigouratJul 21, 2008 10:02
Amen to Zigourat [41 words]Peter.HerzJul 30, 2008 15:20
Second that [95 words]ParsaAug 4, 2008 20:36
Second that [51 words]ParsaAug 7, 2008 19:03
To Heck with the MEK [337 words]Peter J. HerzJul 20, 2008 18:00
Shahdom [8 words]Robert A KerrJul 20, 2008 00:04
Washingon betray people ? [8 words]Doug CorriganJul 19, 2008 20:04
Criminal Waste of a Potential Asset [196 words]Bob SternJul 19, 2008 12:45
disposable alliances, a political manoeuvre [88 words]trans-parereJul 18, 2008 18:05
definition of terrorist [19 words]joe roseJul 18, 2008 11:05
A moral duty and politically savvy [121 words]Stuart RoseJul 17, 2008 22:32
Will Washington Betray Anti-Regime Iranians? [36 words]GeorgeJul 17, 2008 18:18
Opportunists will make use of MEK opportunists. [205 words]M.D'SouzaJul 17, 2008 17:54
Use the resource [104 words]Arif Jayish Al AmirkiJul 27, 2008 20:13
Yes, in a word [85 words]Arif Jayish Al AmirikiJul 17, 2008 14:12
Depends one which Washington you mean [242 words]Lame CherryJul 17, 2008 14:08
Iran and Israel...Marxists and Capitalists vs. Islamists [207 words]DE TeodoruJun 21, 2009 18:33
3,500 anti-regime Iran [172 words]YnnatchkahJul 17, 2008 13:16
In support of Dr Pipes [640 words]Gabrielle (Australia)Jul 17, 2008 11:53
u.s.allies [26 words]jeff lipsonJul 17, 2008 09:41
Action, not words [122 words]Rebecca MouldsJul 17, 2008 08:58
Will Washington Betray Anti-Regime Iranians? [77 words]orange yonasonJul 16, 2008 21:01
Send MEK to Indonesia [77 words]MaureenJul 16, 2008 20:38
⇒ Obligations to Allies, Big & Small [268 words]RubiconJul 16, 2008 20:03
Betrayal [79 words]William C. LinkJul 16, 2008 19:55
Iraqi Sovereignty. [116 words]hyman peskinJul 16, 2008 19:50
Anti-Regime Iranians want to live in US [92 words]Romesh ChanderJul 16, 2008 19:22
MEK [60 words]Jonathan UsherJul 16, 2008 19:14
Will We Ever Learn? [118 words]MarciJul 16, 2008 18:49
Will US betray Iranian anti-regime citizens? [59 words]GaryJul 16, 2008 18:39

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page