Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Can I say something that dissonates from the above?
Reader comment on item: If Not [Arab-Israeli] Peace Now, What?

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Jul 5, 2008 at 01:42

I read all analysis and the ones that touched me best, were Dr. Pipes, Mr. Emerson's and Bryen's one touched especially by the citation: "...peace not is an aberration"....

According to the interviewed, Ones see which line the Momentum prefers. The interviewed were consonant, however, what I do not understand is the sequence of words in the question, b/c somehow, by already having seen a similar manner before, is Momentum making any allusion to the infamous leftist movement "Peace Now" that totally dissonates from the above path?

Read again: If Not PEACE NOW (Shalom Akhshav), what?

And, Peace now heavily advocates the two state "solution" with a lot of abidance to Arab Israelis terrorists (Palestinians) and the two states "solution" (final solution against Israel, of course- although they are not aware of).

They could have written: If Not Now Peace, (then) when?

If Not Peace Now, when?

(absence of proper capital letter): If not peace now, what?

The disposition of the words concerns me...


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (24) on this item

Title By Date
Obama has the wrong associations. [22 words]Robert S. WeissOct 31, 2008 21:43
Iran's Not Civilized! [138 words]Jonathan SelbyAug 13, 2008 17:07
Diplomacy failed, US is Out and Israel's on it's Own [159 words]Jonathan SelbyAug 13, 2008 17:05
Obama's two-state destruction of Israel [365 words]DrRJPJul 31, 2008 11:15
It must be a miracle! [231 words]Ken BesigJul 16, 2008 11:08
"The Arab Mind" [287 words]Alvin SamuelsJul 14, 2008 23:12
What about restrict it to Islamists? [78 words]YnnatchkahJul 16, 2008 23:56
THE HORRIFIC 2-STATE LIE! [229 words]IamJosephJul 7, 2008 22:53
If Not Arab-Israeli Peace Now What--The Horrifice 2-State Lie-Joseph is Right [192 words]AnneJul 16, 2008 09:01
How many need to die [177 words]MarwanOct 9, 2008 05:29
How many need to Die- Response to Marwan [285 words]AnneOct 10, 2008 19:24
We must be realistic [223 words]MarwanOct 11, 2008 23:43
We must be Realistic--Response to Marwan [375 words]AnneOct 13, 2008 09:08
The coming of the permenant Palestinian Diaspora [109 words]Joe KaffirJul 7, 2008 03:11
I agree [946 words]Gabby (Australian Patriot Pro USA Pro Israel Zionist Catholic)Jul 5, 2008 07:09
afraid of Death [42 words]Ahmed KhotaJul 21, 2008 05:38
Toss between survival & demography [133 words]Tommy PetersAug 23, 2008 19:38
Diabolic Islam threat to Israel and all the world [260 words]RichardJul 5, 2008 03:30
Belligerence [198 words]Vinod GulatiJul 27, 2008 02:58
Belligerence is not a word included in the Muslim dictionary [308 words]Kay PAug 12, 2008 17:24
diatribe without substance [231 words]vinod gulatiAug 31, 2008 02:35
"diatribe without substance." Are you kidding me? [1274 words]Kay PSep 1, 2008 07:58
⇒ Can I say something that dissonates from the above? [164 words]YnnatchkahJul 5, 2008 01:42
Israeli State Future Decade [891 words]Lame CherryJul 4, 2008 21:32

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page