69 million page views

How about some substantive arguments?

Reader comment on item: Laurie Mylroie's Shoddy, Loopy, Zany Theories – Exposed

Submitted by bill uzzle (United States), May 29, 2008 at 14:09

As Adlai Stevenson said about Dwight Eisenhower's pitiful campaign rhetoric in 1952. it's time we moved from the General to the specific.

Laurie Mylroie has made some specific and persuasive arguments, which Pipes would do well to lay out before he goes rabidly ad hominem. For example, in Bush Vs. the Beltway, she makes the best case I know of to account for the anthrax mailings in 2001. For starters, could we hear from Pipes on that?

Bill Uzzle

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I thought it's clear that I relied on Andrew McCarthy's essay to make the substantive arguments. I urge you to follow the link to his essay and read it in full.

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Sad, actually [64 words]Danger6Jul 3, 2014 14:47215754
Reading Isikoff/Corn book Hubris and Mylroie's name appears [62 words]Christopher LinesAug 6, 2011 19:03188122
Who needs evidence when you can use words like "shoddy", "loopy", "zany" [51 words]J. AdamsAug 26, 2010 00:25177287
1Laurie Mylroie - Embedded Character Flaw [475 words]Bouvier ReneeMar 20, 2009 15:22152536
A Fiction [38 words]Laurie MylroieAug 25, 2009 09:17152536
Laurie Mylroie [143 words]Renee BouvierSep 29, 2009 14:26152536
Laurie Mylroie vis-à-vis Daniel Pipes [410 words]Renee BouSep 29, 2009 15:23152536
Renee Bouvier's Error [173 words]Laurie MylroieSep 30, 2009 13:42152536
2Laurie Mylroie is right [167 words]drzzDec 22, 2008 20:46145691
Where There is Smoke......OKC [68 words]Joseph FalcoJan 30, 2009 10:47145691
Agree with Drz [84 words]NicoleMar 31, 2010 14:52145691
How about some substantive arguments? [79 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
bill uzzleMay 29, 2008 14:09130475
Don't you're putting in on a thick? [78 words]Peter KauffnerMay 12, 2008 11:22128454
Mylroie doesn't go far enough [118 words]mitchell porterMay 10, 2008 08:55128288
Laurie Mylroie and the Facts [200 words]JonnyJun 25, 2008 07:23128288
The MSNBC story had nothing to do with Saddam [60 words]Jon HMar 3, 2009 21:58128288
1look to the hate out of all islam countries. [109 words]Phil GreendMay 8, 2008 21:38128170
On the subject of the Hateful [102 words]Mikhael BareliJun 7, 2008 12:27128170

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to How about some substantive arguments? by bill uzzle

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)