The Municipal Pool problem cannot be put in the same level as Six Flag.
Reader comment on item: "Muslims Only!" at Adventure Parks

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Apr 21, 2008 at 18:32

I totally believe that it is absurdly wrong to reserve a municipal pool to a specific group, if all kinds pay for the service. It is wrong, may involve corruption...

The case of Six Flags involves a different matter: First of all it is not a service funded by the public like the swimming pool, but a private service. Whenever an infidel is denied, it is wrong and heinous (very Islamist as expected), however it is a private provider, and very probably Muslims blackmailed Six Flag towards that. So, if Six Flag wants to guarantee a determined income in a specific time, regardless the season, then it may have a few couple Muslims along with infidels, or a huge group of Muslims with no infidels, whatsoever by the end of the day will bring a higher income.

Obviously, in the case of the "infidel" couple, since they are neither in the first situation nor in the second, they are being object of harassment for what they were not warned properly about the Islamic racist day. So a law suit would be interesting against Six Flags.

The last solution yet, since myself I have been recently in one park, is to have all infidels together obligating the parks NOT to have any Muslims in there in a specific day. Since Muslims are the only ones who do that, excluding all, by "Math" we are all eligible to exclude ANY Muslim, for what we are in different spaces- Euler Venn diagram.

Let's all have the infidels' only Six Flag day. Of course CAIR will arise the case for a law suit.

In the park where I was-there was lots of Muslims, each couple w/ lots of children of course. So Muslims should not be eligible to go when The infidels' day takes place- let's see how Muslims react to that. Let's start with the amount of days Muslims do that to infidels.

By the end of the day, I find very positive what Muslims do (not what Six Flag's do); b/c the world is getting a new wake up call...

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.