Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

The reality of Israeli-Palestinian political relations
Reader comment on item: Rashid Khalidi's Appointment at Columbia University

Submitted by G. E. Wood (United States), Dec 10, 2003 at 11:48

There is no point in refusing to face the plain fact here: it has been obvious since 1948! The Palestinians simply will not accept the state of Israel in their midst. Why do otherwise rational people fail to see this? I suppose it's because they don't want to see it. And I don't think anyone now living will see the situation change. Look, I'm not saying it's good or bad, I'm just pointing out a simple fact of life. At no time in the history of the world have two different ethnic groups, also of different religions, ever lived in close proximity peacefully, for any length of time. The key word here being peacefully, meaning with an absence of unrest. Recall the Roman occupation of Palestine at the time of Christ -- the Romans were constantly on the lookout for any signs of uprising, and they responded very quickly and forcefully to any such that they saw. It's pretty much the same now.
One thing that might help -- I'm not sure-- is if the legitimacy of the state of Israel could be established, or at least worked on. I sense that this is a big stumbling block, in addition to the differences in ethnicity and religion. There is no use in mind-lessly continuing to paper it over. Bluntly stated, do the Israelis really have legal and moral right to the land? Or did they just move in -- like Adolf moved into Austria and Poland? I don't know; you tell me. They just seem pretty aggressive to me, without there being any particular justification for it. Am I talking sense, or not? RSVP.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (36) on this item

Title By Date
Rashid Khalidi's Appointment at Columbia University [152 words]DebbieDec 13, 2008 10:32
Lies from the Middle Eastern killers, the Arabs and persians. [133 words]Graham DaniellNov 1, 2008 15:08
Shows you [105 words]SydOct 31, 2008 10:47
Thank you Mr. Pipes [115 words]Joan NeelOct 31, 2008 09:46
Hard to disagree with what Khalidi said in the interview. [339 words]pmvOct 30, 2008 17:55
This is just another example... [40 words]BrandanOct 30, 2008 13:20
Rashid Khalidi on C-Span's Book TV [218 words]Luke LeaNov 29, 2006 23:49
⇒ The reality of Israeli-Palestinian political relations [274 words]G. E. WoodDec 10, 2003 11:48
re rashid khalidi [197 words]pinchas (phil) baramSep 9, 2003 01:08
The Sword of Islam in the West [149 words]Gilbert HammersSep 4, 2003 09:05
how blinded we Americans have become! [243 words]matthiasOct 28, 2008 10:47
Thanks for sending that. [82 words]Len RossenSep 4, 2003 00:48
"The likes of Mr.Pipes?" [105 words]Ruth LowrySep 3, 2003 21:20
which he is ... not! [5 words]Eric D.Apr 14, 2008 18:29
Thank you Mr. Pipes for speaking the truth. [7 words]Gil KSep 3, 2003 19:15
Rename it [31 words]Joshua ScholarSep 3, 2003 14:48
Lies and Defenders of the Lies [82 words]Michael "thebassguy"Sep 3, 2003 11:22
Why do we tolerate this? [66 words]Tom PensylSep 3, 2003 10:56
Response to "Why do we tolerate this?" [130 words]Linda MooreOct 31, 2008 12:31
Khalidi [55 words]Charles ChristineSep 3, 2003 09:33
Business As Usual [99 words]Sher ThompsonSep 3, 2003 09:13
Rashid Kalidi's Appointment at Columbia University [76 words]Mr. M. DunskySep 3, 2003 09:04
Hamas vs. the PLO: part of the Civil War [260 words]Glenn KlotzSep 3, 2003 08:19
why? [92 words]jakeJul 23, 2009 20:02
Oh oops where runing out of time... [77 words]LeonSep 3, 2003 07:54
Khalidi seems very uncomfortable [117 words]Mike LynnSep 3, 2003 06:25
Rashid Khaliki on MSNBC 9/2/03 [73 words]Sheila PickerillSep 2, 2003 23:55
targeting palestinian civilians [112 words]Michael D. Kaplan, M.D.Sep 2, 2003 22:39
Khalidi's appointment [379 words]moJan 22, 2007 11:32
donation [3 words]George TomkinSep 2, 2003 22:38
Giv'em enough rope [84 words]Gershon Y. Perry, M.D., F.A.C.C.Sep 2, 2003 21:57
Khalidi [73 words]Louisa BrooksSep 2, 2003 21:45
Rashid Khalidi's spewment. [70 words]Marvin KravetskySep 2, 2003 21:12
About the Rashid interview [82 words]AL GREENFIELDSep 2, 2003 19:46
Misunderstandings [137 words]Robert ArsenaultSep 2, 2003 19:20
Rashid Khalidi's Appointment at Columbia University [137 words]keith markmanSep 2, 2003 19:08

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page