Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Our leaders live and serve for Allah and oil.
Reader comment on item: Homaidan Ali Al-Turki, Colorado Slave-holder

Submitted by rlitzen (United States), Apr 5, 2008 at 22:41

Islam is not a religion. It is a feudal system that more primitive, less civilized, and every bit as tolerant as Hitler Naziism. It is a warrior belief system whose heroes are never peaceful or forgiving (only exception is Saladin- 1200's Crusades). Their believers, muslims, are taught only tihs belief system and way of life.

Democracy is an enemy of this warrior belief system, yet our democratic leaders feel it necessary to treat these muslims as oppressed minorities, solely because they are not white europeans males. They want to destroy all enemies of this warrior belief system and our leaders look the other way- not for democratic reasons, but for monetary gain.

Now, the wealthiest arab isalmic state is giving money to our president, his family, his vice president and we are expected to appease their beliefs in order to keep the cash flow to these few people. Only when we realize that these same people were a few generations ago making billions from Nazi Germany, whose belief system is also that of a warrior superiority culture, will we nuderstand the true danger this country is facing. As FDR was battered by the insistence of our president's grand father to side with Germany solely for his economic interest, we are seeing today how WWII would have turned.

Our troops would never have been on normandy beaches. They would have been serving in the capacity of servant soldiers for nazis in russia, england, africa, asia just as troops today are merely servant soldiers for saudi arabia fighting their enemies who are Iraq, Iran and Syria. Our principles of democracy now have to be explained to our presidential family's benefactors as if we need to apologize for our system of justice not being based on sharia law. Our soldiers are not fighting for any democratic principle in iraq, nor will they fighting for any democratic principles in iran. They are serving the kingdom of saudi arabia as the bushes intended and they wanted our troops to serve the nazis in WWII. The are making up for lost time and monetary opportunity they were deprived of by FDR.

We are engaged in a war with the only country in the middle east that ever tolerated christianity and other religions-iraq. The bush family never made a dime in Iraq. As their forefathers had in WWII, they are making billions from the only true enemy to our country- Saudi Arabia. Rome did not crumble this easily, nor did it die because its leaders were so willingly bought by other countries through such sleazy greed as we have witnessed in the last eight years.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (33) on this item

Title By Date
Why not interview the women again? [123 words]MaskedMarvelOct 23, 2009 02:54
Salud [152 words]OmarOct 10, 2009 11:42
⇒ Our leaders live and serve for Allah and oil. [438 words]rlitzenApr 5, 2008 22:41
hmmm [205 words]john iAug 16, 2008 21:32
hmm [4 words]john iAug 17, 2008 21:38
COUPLA TURKIS [129 words]DANIEL REDMONDMar 29, 2008 22:46
Right-hand possessions [334 words]Tim DraytonJan 5, 2008 08:37
The law in the U.S.A. is what Homaidan Ali Al-Turki was found guilty of breaking not Islamic laws of Saudi Arabia [216 words]Lee OstranderJan 21, 2007 23:44
Commenting on Lee Ostrander's comments [69 words]A AwanApr 17, 2008 16:31
Personal to "A" Awan RE/comment on my comment..open to all... [351 words]Lee OstranderApr 18, 2008 05:13
my words [63 words]nedalSep 18, 2009 22:49
Stay on subject , nedal, we are talking about Laws not Faith in G-d, here [211 words]Lee OstranderSep 20, 2009 01:47
Response to"Sami's comments" [151 words]Capt DaveSep 16, 2006 14:45
The Trials and Travails of a 21st Century Slave Owner [886 words]Denis SchulzSep 12, 2006 09:07
Vaughn [36 words]TruthseekerSep 7, 2006 03:56
Saudi Rape Rules Should Apply [147 words]InfidelSep 7, 2006 01:59
Shame on us!! [112 words]Vaughn GdulaSep 4, 2006 05:10
Lots of ways to "spell" freedom in America. [162 words]OJSep 5, 2006 19:26
RE: Shame on us. [156 words]MaskedMarvelOct 23, 2009 03:02
injustice in the country of freedom (as they assume)
[w/response] [128 words]
nohaSep 1, 2006 14:11
For Noha (Rabina yu'alimha akthar) and justice! [209 words]dhimmi no moreSep 4, 2006 07:36
response to Noha [101 words]ArabiSep 7, 2006 15:31
Response to Noha [90 words]F FryeSep 9, 2006 01:49
our laws [41 words]buffaloacademySep 9, 2006 23:41
Just ADMIT IT : you hate us [141 words]SamiSep 12, 2006 01:38
If you say so... [24 words]Leffler P. BohanonMay 5, 2007 21:54
to the country of freedom, from Saudi Arabia [488 words]a girl from saudi arabia,,tagiSep 10, 2007 21:01
how non-muslims experience islam (answer to noha, sami and tagi) [206 words]G.VishvasMar 29, 2008 07:12
- An ashamed Hindu [83 words]Vikram - An ashamed HinduMar 30, 2008 18:44
Vikram, you do it freely, with my full encouragement [137 words]G.VishvasMar 31, 2008 20:29
Saudi Justice? are you kidding! [160 words]NadimApr 1, 2008 23:57
Not so fast "F" Frye, don't lump everyone into one basket. [88 words]Lee OstranderApr 18, 2008 06:23
agree [148 words]j.iAug 17, 2008 22:37

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page