Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

deeper discussion
Reader comment on item: The Organization of the Islamic Conference Gets Feisty
in response to reader comment: Reply to 30th of February has already happened.

Submitted by G.Vishvas (India), Mar 29, 2008 at 22:18

respected Mr. Curmally

Kuran tells muslims that they alone have the right to determine what is good and bad in the entire human society. The muslims are the preferred ones of an arabic 7th century god called allah. This allah says that islam is the final perfect religion and one who does not have islam is lost here and in the yonderworld. The kuran commands the muslims to terrorize those who oppose islam's absolute and total hegemony.

You believe whatever you want to believe and I believe whatever I want to believe - that sounds nice, but is problematic in a globalised small world. Islam is having evil consequences for many - both muslims and non-muslims. Under such circumstances it is irresponsible not to analyse deeply and admit the deficiencies in one's own religion (be it islam or hindu religions or whatever). Islam contains defects and deficiencies and many elements of fascism and totalitarianism. Hindu religions also contain such elements and that has to be openly mentioned and not covered up.

We have to talk about it openly without being threatened by fanatics who call every criticism as blapshemy and try to suppres it.

Your email sounds pious - but piety is very often a cover up for intellectual laziness or even dishonesty. Islam is a harsh narrow-minded aggressive arrogant land-greedy religion that tolerates no criticism or rejection and this has to be exposed and countered. There may be muslims like you who are quietist or tolerant (at least you have presented yourself as such in this particular email) - but that cannot be said of islam as a whole.

"You are good and I am good" - such a sentiment can lead to a dangerous hypocrisy. "We want to be better, we are not good enough" - that should be the attitude. This will avoid hypocrisy.

As regards islam being the fastest growing religion: this is a typical muslim argument - a very silly one. Maggots grow fast in a dead animal - does that mean they are good for human health? Growth rate is no proof of something being good or correct. Islam's greed shines forth through this argument about islam being good because so many people are muslims or becoming muslims.

Islam's goodness will be decided on the basis of its actual performance of the past 1400 years. Not on the basis of how many timid fools become or remain muslims. I can't express it less harshly. Islam is a harsh religion and has to be judged harshly. I can't avoid that.

I don't see anything about islam or about being a muslim which a muslim can be proud of - if he is honest, if he is allowed to be honest. Transcend your indoctrination and fear and then you will see what is right or wrong about or in islam.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (36) on this item

Title By Date
Western And Non-Muslim Policy-Makers Need To Create An Anti-Sharia Bloc [231 words]GWKMar 26, 2008 08:34
GWK- But How? [122 words]YnnatchkahApr 1, 2008 23:06
How? Some Thoughts ... [177 words]GWKApr 2, 2008 21:56
A natural process? [201 words]GWKApr 3, 2008 20:53
You are so right, GWK [147 words]YnnatchkahApr 4, 2008 21:08
Not So Fast -- Spine is Needed, But That's Where We Part. [59 words]GWKApr 7, 2008 18:02
What a great idea! I can't wait for OIC's first lawsuit against non-Muslims. [74 words]DrRJPMar 23, 2008 16:22
Another bumbling "rep"..... [135 words]Abu NuwasMar 23, 2008 14:07
No Chruch in Saudia, No Mosque in the West [91 words]OlieMar 23, 2008 07:14
The Organization of the Islamic Conference Gets Feisty [371 words]Fazal Habib CurmallyMar 23, 2008 03:07
Fazal Habib [107 words]OlieMar 25, 2008 09:08
Reply to Olie [695 words]Fazal Habib CurmallyMar 26, 2008 00:47
The OIC Summit, just concluded in Dakar, Senegal [157 words]Dr. Steve CarolMar 22, 2008 19:38
'The new leadership moving into moderation'! [69 words]M.D'SouzaMar 22, 2008 17:40
What arrogance and immaturity. [161 words]GeorgeOfTheJungleMar 21, 2008 08:34
A majority of leaders and clerics of Muslims have done them a great disservice... [249 words]KatteyMar 21, 2008 21:31
wrong [63 words]yamMar 17, 2009 14:43
Two Points of "Extreme" Moderation. [244 words]YnnatchkahMar 17, 2008 16:34
It's now or never [133 words]Rebecca MouldsMar 17, 2008 09:42
Lots of American citizens are aware. [219 words]KatteyMar 19, 2008 17:07
On legal action [346 words]MeghanMar 17, 2008 03:13
about OIC and lazy money [282 words]G.VishvasMar 17, 2008 00:11
Economics to save Western Civilization from Islamic Opressors- being destroyed. [460 words]YnnatchkahMar 18, 2008 22:02
To be fair: [160 words]KatteyMar 19, 2008 17:28
The Brits renegged on their promise to the Jews long before any promise made to any other ME country. [261 words]DrRJPMar 20, 2008 15:01
The Brits and the Middle East - early 20th century. [304 words]KatteyMar 21, 2008 01:37
About OIC and lazy money. [181 words]fazal Habib CurmallyMar 23, 2008 03:19
please read carefully [271 words]G.VishvasMar 24, 2008 05:03
Reply to Mr Vishvas. [107 words]Fazal Habib CurmallyMar 25, 2008 02:07
replying to Curmally [567 words]G.VishvasMar 25, 2008 22:23
My next reply to Mr. Vishvas. [191 words]Fazal Habib CurmllyMar 27, 2008 00:24
30th of February has already happened [253 words]G.VishvasMar 27, 2008 21:50
Reply to 30th of February has already happened. [178 words]Fazal Habib CurmallyMar 28, 2008 23:11
⇒ deeper discussion [474 words]G.VishvasMar 29, 2008 22:18
Reply to Mr Vishvas 29th March 2008. [137 words]Fazal Habib CurmallyMar 31, 2008 00:24
about transcending mental slavery [507 words]G.VishvasMar 31, 2008 21:05

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page