replying to Curmally
Reader comment on item: The Organization of the Islamic Conference Gets Feisty
in response to reader comment: Reply to Mr Vishvas.

Submitted by G.Vishvas (India), Mar 25, 2008 at 22:23

Respected Curmally

No need to bring in Nigeria and Venezuela. They are, as far as I know, not financing global islamo-fascism, obscurantism and terrorism with their petro-dollars. We have to talk about urgent problems and not about everything under the sun. Some muslims in Nigeria however are supporting islamo-fascism (with or without petro-dollars) and that will have to be talked about.

My objection was not to importing technology (in deed no need to reinvent the wheel, as you say) - but to demanding money for something one has not done. I even blamed the capitalist system in general (not just the muslim petro-dollarists) that it allows people to become rich without doing hard honest work and instead makes money the measure of everything, irrespective of how this money is obtained and how it is used.

Read CAREFULLY my first posting to this theme and you will not find all those points which you are criticizing on me. "about OIC and lazy money [282 words] G.Vishvas Mar 17, 2008 00:11"

Many people are pocketing money without doing hard honest work for it - I was not mentioning all of

them by name but only the OIC financiers because that was what the topic is about.

India's export of raw petroleum is hardly one percent of its total export sum. But in some muslim

countries 90% of the income is obtained by blackmailing non-muslims through petroleum deals.

Your formulation "India produces oil" is wrong - India does not produce any oil. Some oil is found under the land that is called India. It is not something that India or indians have created through their labour. This analysis shows how you muslims have not developed the abilty to think accurately and answer questions honestly or take criticism in a spirit of open-minded inquiry. Islam means submission, that means mental slavery, and that makes it basically impossible for a muslim to become a sincere open-minded honest debater in his purely islamic function.

I have been writing emails to and receiving emails from muslims, and all of them show a big deficit when it comes to sincerity in debate - they tend to become polemic and start criticising things which have not been said at all. As soon as a non-muslim criticises something islamic they let loose a standard repertoire of sentences against him. Pakistanis are especially dumb in this context, especially when they have a chance to let loose their pakistan-ideology-indoctrination against a person from India.

I know what you pakistanis are taught about India, hindus, hindu religions, hindu history and hindu ancestors. Every time a pakistani replies to me he reveals these indoctrinations massively.

Peaceful coexistence requires honesty about history - and that is not possible within the framework of islam. Islam means mental slavery under a 7th century arabic god-concept and that is incompatible with the honesty that is required in the 21st century. Islam does not allow any critical honest look at islam's and muslims' misdeeds, idiocies, sins and failures.

Arthur Koestler wrote a book "The God that failed". It was about marxism-communism in which he once believed and left disappointed. A new book with the same title is now necessary and possible about islam and its 7th century arabic god-concept called allah. You pakistanis must prepare yourself carefully for this transition.

I wish me (and to you) safety and freedom from islam (=submission=mental slavery) for the future.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.