comments on Iraqification
Reader comment on item: The case for 'Iraqification'

Submitted by C.d'A-Scheinberg (United States), Nov 25, 2003 at 11:38

To Dr D.PIPES
I have a lot of respect for your knowledge as a Middle East scholar the ambitious and prolific articles on the subject and certain of your views But a bit biasely pro Bush and that is disturbing.

What Iraqui government or active council chosen by the Bush administration would be endorsed by the people of Iraq? A Chalabi regime ?

...I do not agree about a new Bush policy 'par excellence' which would allow a new Iraqui government with the chances of developing a successful economy and flourishing culture.!!

With such an ambiguous policy in the middle East , with Bush's persistent alliance support and almost symbiotic policy with the Saudis and their Wahabi ties ( that you have other times pointed out ) and their mutual oil co-dependence, How would you
expect an intelligent 'ordered 'consistent policy changes in the Bush administration whose internal fragmentation is already being felt out-side ? Congress approved 87 billions distribution into a chaotic country ?
I will still continue to truly enjoy your letters although wishing you could be a bit more realistic about Bush policy "toward excellence !.I am sure you appreciate some degree of divergence of opinions . Still your Fan reader !.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.