Two Points of "Extreme" Moderation.

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Mar 17, 2008 at 16:34

Two points of Extreme "moderation" supported "a priori" by Sada:

According to Wikipedia

"…The primary goals of the OIC are, according to its Status, "to promote solidarity among all Islamic member states.""…

1. So, Sada Cumber considers a ground of OIC already "moderate", for what he states that he found "a new more moderate leadership in the Islamic world.", as if a previous (moderate) one ever existed.

And,

Well, if he found a more moderate, he considers that despite to the fact that OIC racially and religiously discriminates others for what OIC primary goals is to promote solidarity among all ISLAMIC member states (not non Islamic or hybrid relations in between the two) as a primary goal, thus the base of its existence, this " new moderate leadership" (looking as an encouragement) is useless, for what it will never contradict the primary goal of OIC, which is one of the sources of the Islamic imperialism and Oppression towards infidels.

2. I was wondering why the State department sent a magnate with Islamic Roots and from TX. - Where the most heinous lobby against the independence of the western civilization from the Islamic Oppression and Imperialism through "oil", is located.

The major gangsters against Ethanol and the Syntroleum technology, the ones that put down the Syntroleum imperative role in saving us from the Islamic economics bestiality, (companies that have been massacred by major Brokerages), these gangsters are in TX and NY.

What a perfect consummation.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".