69 million page views

Iraqification

Reader comment on item: The case for 'Iraqification'

Submitted by Leo Charendoff (United States), Nov 19, 2003 at 11:25

Your comments on the sudden and understated change in the Bush's posture on Iraq are well taken. However you ignore the obvious: the reasons the Administration went into Iraq in the first place and the fact that it has cost us over 400 American lives and many thousands of injured (and still counting) not to mention the tens of thousands of Iraqi dead and injured.

Your article tacitly implies that we are there because of an overwhelming need to help the Iraqis rather than the multiple and mostly unsupported reasons that were offered by the President in the not too distant past. I call that approach the Maxwell Smart approach to the war: "Chief would you believe that we are here because Saddam has...? No? Well Chief would you believe that we are here because...? No? Well would you believe..."

I supported the war because Saddam Hussein was a dangerous man capable of almost anything that I could imagine. We are in Iraq because he was a threat to the world and Israel. Mr. Bush should have stuck to this instead of making one false assertion after another and alienating the whole world as well as most of the American public. We were never in Iraq because of a need to democratize Iraqis which is the latest Maxwell Smart attempt to convince us that we are doing the right thing. However the American public is not buying these rationalizations and now that we are in the quagmire isn't it convenient that we plan to be out of there by next June just in time for the next election? Or am I being too cynical?
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (38) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Strongly support your suggestion !!! [89 words]Nicola RussoApr 9, 2004 11:3414587
iraq's future [43 words]fereydounMar 7, 2004 14:4714107
Is the Islamic Republic of Iraq worth Billions of UF Dollars? [133 words]TomFeb 23, 2004 10:4713971
Germans were defeated & accepted remake [98 words]Gary WimberlyFeb 3, 2004 09:3213684
The case against Iraqification [217 words]Michael ElvinDec 15, 2003 10:1612662
Turkish Model [24 words]Robert ArbetmanDec 2, 2003 17:1512420
I don't understand [176 words]MonicaDec 1, 2003 07:0312395
Iraqification? [45 words]SkyhookNov 27, 2003 12:0412345
comments on Iraqification [200 words]C.d'A-ScheinbergNov 25, 2003 11:3812291
Comparing Germany/Japan to Iraq [123 words]Nov 24, 2003 22:3112289
Some Good Insghts on Iraq [52 words]R burmeisterNov 20, 2003 18:3412252
I may be wrong [296 words]Ed SparksNov 20, 2003 18:1912251
Made your case! [35 words]Ivan BarnaNov 20, 2003 13:3812248
Problems with Iraqification [117 words]Peter J. HerzNov 20, 2003 05:4612246
Reality and common sense. [55 words]Tirza Preis TanzmanNov 20, 2003 01:2112244
Further comments on the future of Iraq [92 words]E. J. BlumbergNov 19, 2003 22:5312243
Very Interesting [180 words]AvrahamNov 19, 2003 21:0012241
Keep in Bush's ear [113 words]E.P.AbelNov 19, 2003 19:5212240
Recipe for disaster [213 words]Mehran AlimNov 19, 2003 16:4912239
The Brilliance of Simplicity [22 words]Patrice HendersonNov 19, 2003 12:2412236
Saddam's Mountain Chemical Bombshelters [115 words]a former "intelligent" officer who was in M.E.Nov 19, 2003 12:0612235
Iraq; start with municipal elections [45 words]henk TwerdaNov 19, 2003 12:0412234
Brilliant Analysis [98 words]Joe BentzelNov 19, 2003 11:4012232
Iraqification [272 words]Leo CharendoffNov 19, 2003 11:2512227
Bravo, the same for Israel [88 words]yuval BrandstetterNov 19, 2003 11:0312225
Something is missing from your Iraqification article [44 words]Susan IrelandNov 19, 2003 10:1812224
Maybe not! [53 words]Matt BaumNov 19, 2003 09:4512222
Iraq [70 words]max greenNov 19, 2003 09:1412221
1What about a confederation for Iraq [115 words]Richard AlpertNov 19, 2003 09:1412220
Iraq's tribal society is the missing element [279 words]John R.Feb 18, 2007 16:5612220
1Iraq Confederation is Better than Current Federation [248 words]David WestonMar 4, 2007 14:2112220
comparison [113 words]BabyloniansSep 14, 2007 10:3312220
Cantons and The Iraqi Tribal System [60 words]Sam StolzoffMay 22, 2009 10:4512220
Iraqi Policy [303 words]HughNov 19, 2003 08:3212219
Yes, but -- [85 words]Murray KupersmithNov 19, 2003 08:2212218
One more difference between Iraq and Germany/Japan [223 words]Linas KondratasNov 19, 2003 07:5812217
Decision making [50 words]Steve WellsNov 19, 2003 06:3212215
hunt Sadaam without boots [37 words]David WaxmanNov 19, 2003 06:1012214

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)