69 million page views

A New Racist Theory? Reply to David W. Lincoln

Reader comment on item: Palestinians Who Prefer Israel
in response to reader comment: The brokenness attributable to early decisions: To Seamus MacNemi

Submitted by Seamus MacNemi (United States), Jan 7, 2008 at 21:34

Absolutely nothing happened to the DNA of Adam and Eve that translated down to us as a flaw in our natures. Our natures are no different than that of any other creature in this world. We are all formed of the same four basic genetic molecules and that includes plants. Are you going to tell me that plants also inherited the sin of Adam?

Adam's sin was the abdication from his responsibilities as a care taker in the garden. G-d told him not to eat the fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil but his curiosity made him want to do just exactly that. If G-D had made no mention of the tree or its fruit then in all likelyhood Adam would never have even thought about it. There was plenty for him to eat so he would never have gone hungry.

It was only because G-D brought the tree up as an issue that Adam even knew about it. This whole story reminds me of a bottle of whiskey that was hidden in a cupboard and the old man thought his son would drink it so he told his son not to drink it. The boy didn't even know of the wiskey until his father told him of it and made it seem something important so quite naturally the boy was curious and was provoked to investigate for himself. Not by any serpent, mind you, but by his very own G-D given nature which was inquisitive as is the nature of all young creatures. Look at any kitten or pup and you will see the same curiosity and inquisitiveness.

The young are always into mischief and must be taught by their elders what to do and what not to do. Adam had the mind of no more than a boy. You cannot suppose that he was formed fully knowledgable and wise. If he had been so then he never would have eaten the fruit.

As well, Adam compounded his error by trying to hide the fact that he had eaten the fruit and then blaming Eve. Nobody forced Adam to eat the fruit, that he did of his own free will as did Eve. The serpent was merely incidental. He did not cause either Adam or Eve to disobey G-D. Their acts were theirs alone done with their own free will as are the acts of all men. No man has ever been forced to do evil. Even Satan does not have the power to make a man do anything that he is not willing to do in the first place.

If there was any fault in Adam that is also in us it is the willingness to do what we want to do regardless of the consequence and then when the inevitable consequence befalls us we seek to shift blame to some other and to hide or deny our own involvement in the matter. Such atrait comes from the need to protect ones self from fear and harm. It is only the natural desire for self preservation taken to an extreme.

There is nothing inherently evil in mans nature any more than in any other aspect of nature. What we call evil is the product of ignorance and fear coupled with arrogant self preoccupation. It is a perversion of our basic natures brought on by what we are taught as children. If there is any doubt in what I am saying you only have to look at the Roman Emperor Caligula for an example. If you know his history and the way he grew up you can see the resulting evil manifest in his acts. If he had been raised differently it is very likely that he would grown up to be a great man.

It's simple, as the twig is bent, so grows the tree. Likewise the man. I do not see evil men in the world. I see only souls that have been bent and broken by the things that were done to them as children. If a child grows up knowing only perversion, cruelty and brutality you cannot expect him to become a saint. He is most likely to behave just exactly as he was taught.

This whole business of the so called "Super Natural" is a total nonsequitor in the face of reality. There is no such thing. If you want to spend your life whirling in circles, muttering incantations and waving your hands in the air that's your affair. Do not expect the same from me.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (92) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Logical to want to live under Israeli rule........ [247 words]FroikeFeb 8, 2013 08:05203326
2Should Israel offer pro-Israel Arabs a chance to become Jews? [75 words]Godfrey deBouillonJan 29, 2010 18:21168100
Polemic from Jonathon Cook [83 words]garry priorFeb 8, 2008 00:15119780
Jeff Rense [131 words]Rochelle MichaelsFeb 10, 2008 15:49119780
jeff rense [212 words]JJOct 11, 2008 21:25119780
1Jeff Rense [154 words]KristaOct 16, 2008 12:04119780
I agree [118 words]thebimblyJan 26, 2010 15:49119780
the real reason a Palestinian state is NOT what the Palestinians want [162 words]Jose AmramJan 18, 2008 15:36118472
good idea [11 words]jacobJan 13, 2008 16:44118084
Why not... It is the promised land. [128 words]Egyptian ChristianJan 8, 2008 10:51117732
trojan horse [86 words]gdbJan 7, 2008 09:00117640
choice: two different set of morals [42 words]Phil GreendJan 5, 2008 21:08117572
obvious exaggeration [23 words]Ronald MC WashingtonNov 18, 2009 14:32117572
Why change of heart? [33 words]Alex SabyJan 4, 2008 18:53117536
The Palestinians have decided that the 2 State solution is dead or ought to be euthenased ASAP. [407 words]alanJan 4, 2008 17:58117534
Hypocrisy [80 words]mark GoldbergJan 4, 2008 00:30117492
TO: mark goldberg of france - * Hypocrisy * [132 words]Rochelle MichaelsJan 5, 2008 16:44117492
Speak up when it counts. [175 words]JayJan 2, 2008 23:40117384
I don't doubt the wariness about accepting citizenship in an Arab Palestinian state, but don't discount duplicity. [313 words]DanteJan 2, 2008 19:26117376
Reason number (what) 4? 8? 20? [288 words]Ron ThompsonJan 2, 2008 18:03117373
1Palestinian Authority = Mafia [219 words]Charles NixonJan 2, 2008 17:01117369
AHA! [86 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 2, 2008 14:03117349
Yep Seamus. [21 words]YnnatchkahJan 3, 2008 02:34117349
Palestine people don't want to be in PLO areas , they want to be in Israel..safe [84 words]kim segarJan 2, 2008 13:04117346
Passive Jihad [207 words]Peter, ScotlandJan 2, 2008 12:45117343
Let's not be intolerant, like the Shiites and Sunnis. [223 words]Mary ConnorJan 2, 2008 21:34117343
Live and let live, but please leave my heritage [176 words]Peter, ScotlandJan 4, 2008 15:03117343
IMPORTANT NUMBERS [415 words]DAVID PAJan 2, 2008 11:43117342
Palestinians self-destructive, this is interesting but meaningless [59 words]Charles MartelJan 2, 2008 11:16117340
But why... [29 words]Stuart TeichJan 2, 2008 06:44117327
Vast majority of Jerusalem Arabs rejected citizenship & opted for permanent residence status [62 words]David GoshenJan 2, 2008 06:29117325
Completely true [56 words]satiricohenJan 2, 2008 02:57117322
Sincerely..... [332 words]YnnatchkahJan 2, 2008 02:04117321
Palestinians Who Prefer Israel [31 words]DAVID R. GROESBECKJan 2, 2008 01:43117319
Wouldn't it be loverly. [187 words]Mary ConnorJan 2, 2008 00:48117318
No publicity for those that prefer Israel [46 words]Rae SharfmanJan 1, 2008 23:39117312
Paradise Found? [328 words]Rebecca MouldsJan 3, 2008 21:22117312
This is No Positive Implication - The Implication is I will Live with You on Account of the Benefits. I Still Hate You From the Core of My Heart [418 words]SinghaJan 1, 2008 22:49117309
Palestinians still want to destroy Israel--Keep the Arab population of Israel as small as possible [37 words]RafiJan 1, 2008 22:07117307
The Palestinians prefer Israel to the PA, but, they still do not want the Jews. [104 words]RafiJan 1, 2008 21:51117306
Preferring Israel [133 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sofa SogoodJan 1, 2008 20:20117303
Not suprising [48 words]AndrewJan 1, 2008 19:56117301
Any rational person prefers life over death [75 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Eben SpinozaJan 1, 2008 19:51117300
palestinians prefer living in Israel [184 words]Janusz KowalikJan 1, 2008 19:27117299
Atheism is not a panacea [178 words]Henry Davis - AustraliaJan 2, 2008 05:45117299
Politics Rules! [27 words]Brian HJan 3, 2008 11:54117299
Atheism doesn't equate to despotism [45 words]MattJan 3, 2008 17:30117299
the ideal system [111 words]Henry Davis - AustraliaJan 4, 2008 00:43117299
RE: Palestinians Who Prefer Israel [267 words]Marc WeintraubJan 1, 2008 18:30117297
RE: Palestinians Who Prefer Israel [25 words]There is NO Santa ClausJan 4, 2008 08:32117297
Hypocrisy writ large [64 words]MontyJan 1, 2008 18:26117296
The Arab Israeli Voice [60 words]Rochelle MichaelsJan 1, 2008 18:13117295
Very Interesting [83 words]BlackspeareJan 1, 2008 17:24117292
Individual as the unit of value [84 words]Henry Davis - AustraliaJan 3, 2008 04:43117292
Just another thought [78 words]DavePJan 1, 2008 17:13117291
Demographics [195 words]TiburonJan 2, 2008 11:01117291
Arabs in Israel [42 words]Donald W. BalesJan 1, 2008 17:03117290
What religion? [7 words]Robert LynnJan 1, 2008 23:35117290
Religion of Arabs in Israel [77 words]Donald W. BalesJan 2, 2008 17:12117290
Uh, yeah ... [13 words]Brian HJan 3, 2008 11:28117290
Religions in Israel [105 words]Donald W. BalesJan 3, 2008 21:45117290
RE:Religion [31 words]Robert LynnJan 4, 2008 03:39117290
It's a start [71 words]David W. LincolnJan 1, 2008 16:50117289
Cancer within [56 words]Gerry BurkeJan 1, 2008 20:38117289
How to be cured [69 words]David W. LincolnJan 2, 2008 14:50117289
Whose Cure? [93 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 4, 2008 12:06117289
Whose cure indeed [259 words]David W. LincolnJan 4, 2008 19:34117289
The Elders Have Always Been With Us: To David Lincoln [496 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 6, 2008 10:01117289
The brokenness attributable to early decisions: To Seamus MacNemi [318 words]David W. LincolnJan 6, 2008 22:58117289
A New Racist Theory? Reply to David W. Lincoln [757 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 7, 2008 21:34117289
The Faith of the Elders Imputed to Abraham is the Faith Called for by Jesus Christ [414 words]M. ToveyJan 8, 2008 15:48117289
Fine [76 words]David W. LincolnJan 8, 2008 20:50117289
In reply to David W. Lincoln [536 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 9, 2008 18:11117289
Objective Truth [139 words]David W. LincolnJan 10, 2008 22:44117289
Objective Truth And Supposition [241 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 12, 2008 02:42117289
Accountability [44 words]David W. LincolnJan 12, 2008 20:24117289
Accountability To Whom And For What [272 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 14, 2008 18:16117289
I won't be fenced in [147 words]David W. LincolnJan 15, 2008 15:22117289
Ah Yes, No Thanks I suppose To Nicea [498 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 18, 2008 12:30117289
Indeed [254 words]David W. LincolnJan 18, 2008 22:20117289
In This We Finally May Agree [281 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 20, 2008 11:01117289
Nice weaving in of Shakespeare [41 words]David W. LincolnJan 20, 2008 22:50117289
Where Does Shakespeare Fit In? [81 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 21, 2008 17:41117289
I must appologise for my error [154 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 22, 2008 16:09117289
Apology accepted [116 words]David W. LincolnJan 22, 2008 18:15117289
The Mirror Reflects But We See Little Of The Whole In The Reflection [488 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 23, 2008 22:49117289
More than the tangible [71 words]David W. LincolnJan 24, 2008 16:28117289
The Faith Of Abraham Was Not What You Think [576 words]Seamus MacNemiFeb 4, 2008 02:34117289
Abraham's Faith in His L--d is the Model of the Faith One Should Have in The Anointed of the L--d [679 words]M. ToveyFeb 5, 2008 11:23117289
It Is A Matter Of " Who" Bows To Whom [125 words]Seamus MacNemiFeb 7, 2008 19:49117289
Sh'ma Israel - At His Name Every Knee Shall Bow [555 words]M. ToveyFeb 8, 2008 17:43117289
Reply To M. Tovey [237 words]Seamus MacNemiFeb 9, 2008 17:05117289

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)