29 readers online now

99,284 comments by 26,351 readers

Go to Mobile Site

The confluence of nuclear terrorism and the Islamic agenda
Reader comment on item: Washington Protects the Terror Masters

Submitted by Narine Singh (Canada), Dec 31, 2007 at 20:24

Osama knows the value of terror and fear it has upon his enemies. He will view as his grandest fantasy come true - a miracle indeed - were he to place his hands on some uranium for making dirty bombs, and were he to get some atomic bombs, though this is thought by some to be very difficult, he and his cohorts would think that they have died and gone to heaven. Every effort will be made by the Taleban, al Qeada and other terrorist organizations including the Pakistani ISI - devout muslims who have responded to the call to arms by the mullahs - to procure such a weapon that would produce the greatest possible fear on its enemies.

This is not a war on terrorists or terrorism; this is a war against all other religions by Islam, for to be a true Muslim one cannot be friends with Christians, Jews, and least of all pagans, like Hindus and Buddhists, and one cannot ignore being involved in jihad until all the world surrenders to Islam and its prophet. Remember the highest seat and greatest rewards are given to the jihadist who produces the greatest danger to the kafirs. Its intent is to first capture its "lost territories", India and Israel being two of them.

The creation of Pakistan, part of which is now independent Bangladesh, began this effort in south Asia, and Pakistan is only the spring board to seize the rest of the subcontinent it has laid calim to. At the same time, it is bedeviled in its efforts to seize the rest, as attempts have led to fragmentation of its existing state, and further wars might lead to further fragmentation. So, in frustration it turns to the next best strategy, bring India to its knees through incessant uncompromising terror, the epitome of instruments would be a nuclear device, dirty bomb or other wise to be used in this effort. The strategy is the same in the Balkans, Thailand, the Philippines, and the Middle East.

In the meantime, the so-called Islamic "scholars" the best historical revisionists and propagandists the world has seen, in that after a band of illiterate desert dwellers moved from being murderous blood thirsty highway robbers and conquered Mecca and Medina, who spread their blood and sword across north Africa, Spain, the Balkans, India, Asia Minor, the Transcaucus, and other places, and yet they with great vehemence, anger, and skill, lay a guilt trip on the conquered and destroyed peoples, so much so that they begin to question the rightness of their own right to resist and defend themselves against such a merciless religious hegemon. That is being done even today, and the desire by the west to be politically correct and not offend any one, even at the price of the truth, it their achilles heel, and the muslims know it.

This is nauseating since little do they know that Muslims are forbidden to enter into agreements with infidels, at least not ones that they are expected to keep, but they are expected to feign honour and at the right moment back stab and renege on committed trust. Remember that this book -their guide - has come right from the pit of hell, and as light is better appreciated when juxtaposed with complete darkness, Islam is this darkness. The west and other freedom loving peoples of the world need to study their own history, and find out what the Muslim invaders did to their forbears and to connect current events with their far greater terror of the past so that they would see that the Muslim agenda has not changed; it was held in storage for a while, Muslims remonstrating and mourning the loss of the Ottoman Empire, but its trajectory is conquest of the entire world, even at the cost of thousands of millions of lives.

Its quest has been revived (and though the declaration of the mulslim Caliphate of Afghanistan by Mullah Omar might seem to some to be premature and boldly ostentaious, it was real. Islam is strong today, thanks to their new found oil wealth, and no thanks to the Americans who dole out billions to the likes of Musharraf. With footloose nuclear weapons it has a new found confidence, and it is looking for a decisive, and a once for all fight with the infidels so that their complete domination might be sealed and the black Islamic flag will fly from east to west and from north to south, and all the world would be Islam. It intends to use nuclear weapons, and when they do, who do you hold responsible? Pakistan could always claim to know nothing about the whereabouts of terrorists in its own ISI, and even complain beforehand that their weapons are in danger of falling into their hands, so who do you punish when one or two are exploded in Bombay and New Delhi? They are made by Pakistan stateless for reason, so it could pretend innocence.

Again study your history. Islam respects power, great power, not soft power, and muslims are not fools to surrender their territories and lives to gain a handful of dust. This would sound very brazen, harsh and jingoistic, but it is only when all their lands are taken from them, when their peoples are freed from this religion that they will come to their senses and stop their murderous ways, and stop inventing imaginary wrongs for more hatred and murder. Please take Pakistan's nuclear bombs from them.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (52) on this item

Title By Date
⇒ The confluence of nuclear terrorism and the Islamic agenda [918 words]Narine SinghDec 31, 2007 20:24
Condi Co-Opted By America's Permanent Foreign Policy Establishment [PFPE] ; She No Longer Represents or Defends The Sound, Rational Positions That Got Bush Elected. [285 words]marianaDec 3, 2007 14:53
The Marlboro Element [102 words]HarrakNov 20, 2007 01:21
So What? [74 words]another infidelNov 21, 2007 01:54
The other infidel`s damn dam [329 words]HaryNov 21, 2007 23:28
small correction [55 words]HarraKNov 23, 2007 09:58
Harrakaneese Spokesman?! [136 words]another infidelNov 28, 2007 05:03
Bush doesn't get it [33 words]InfidelNov 19, 2007 21:42
The homeless freedom fighters [104 words]HarraKNov 22, 2007 23:27
Agenda [97 words]donvanNov 23, 2007 12:02
Conspiracy theory of Media Agenda [75 words]HarrakNov 23, 2007 21:06
In order to avoid underhanded dealing... [18 words]Archimedes2Nov 17, 2007 23:43
If We Level Charges Against Iran, Then We Expose America to Similar Charges [59 words]Geoffrey SherwoodNov 17, 2007 12:31
Huge Difference [86 words]YnnatchkahNov 19, 2007 02:37
Response to Ynnatchkah [144 words]Geoffrey SherwoodNov 19, 2007 21:27
When the Evil of Terrorism is Lost in the Moral Debate of It, the Fight is Lost. [566 words]M. ToveyNov 20, 2007 21:34
Response to M. Tovey [332 words]Geoffrey SherwoodNov 23, 2007 00:29
Moral Guidance Response - Looking for an Answer [211 words]M. ToveyNov 24, 2007 14:56
Islamomyth.... [132 words]donvanNov 26, 2007 10:00
Musharraf and Pakistan have fooled Washington Maximum - 10 Billion Dollars and Counting, Much of It Will Boost Islamism [574 words]SinghaNov 17, 2007 01:27
Singha understands Islam better than most people [55 words]InfidelNov 19, 2007 20:20
SINGHA WAS ON THE MONEY, but didn't scratch the surface of the issues. [1320 words]HILDA E. DAVISJan 11, 2008 14:52
Yes they have made fool [103 words]amin b nagpureDec 15, 2008 14:20
Amicus curiae: friend of the court? Which court? [142 words]jennifer solisNov 16, 2007 16:39
American justice is too soft on terrorists [209 words]MauriceNov 16, 2007 11:57
The poison spreads [55 words]David W. LincolnNov 15, 2007 23:58
Send them all back [108 words]BarbaraNov 23, 2007 23:58
The immorality is far worse than failing to coinfiscate funds from these monsters. [90 words]Ralph C Whaley MDNov 15, 2007 20:39
Washington Protects the Terror Masters [146 words]M.D. AnthonyNov 15, 2007 17:17
See Comment to Hadida [18 words]kosowerNov 16, 2007 14:30
WASHINSGTON PROTECTS THE TERROR MASTERS [57 words]JACQUES HADIDANov 15, 2007 17:15
Follow the command trail (or the money) [48 words]kosowerNov 16, 2007 14:26
sad conclusion [106 words]Rebecca MouldsNov 16, 2007 16:39
Rebecca, 1 Tim 6:10 [118 words]InfidelNov 19, 2007 20:55
inimicus curiae [127 words]Rebecca MouldsNov 15, 2007 16:59
the academy strikes again... [96 words]donvanNov 16, 2007 12:44
The foolish and the insane. [142 words]MarciNov 15, 2007 16:27
Loss of Liberty and Injustice for All [403 words]M. ToveyNov 15, 2007 15:40
It is the same the whole world over [64 words]NessieNov 25, 2007 10:03
Remember, our "Conservative" president has worked against us consistently [150 words]Charles MartelNov 15, 2007 12:50
What is the Government's Stated Reason For So Acting? [18 words]david l thomsonNov 15, 2007 12:09
The Answer is Simple [76 words]BlackspeareNov 16, 2007 20:44
as enemy or as friend [136 words]G.VishvasNov 15, 2007 12:07
reply [415 words]shaynaNov 20, 2007 17:22
Not surprising [191 words]GWNov 15, 2007 11:02
Sleeping With Terrorists [412 words]John R. PeacherNov 15, 2007 11:00
Some elements in the American government still have hope [619 words]Ken BesigNov 15, 2007 10:31
If the USA cannot handle terror in their courts they should stop trying to claim that they are fighting world terror [81 words]david oshenNov 15, 2007 10:04
Bush is with America' enemies; many are close personal friends of the Bush family [627 words]Steve KleinNov 15, 2007 09:56
Yes, our President is personal friends with many of our worst Moslem enemies [186 words]Charles MartelNov 16, 2007 11:40
basic american intelligence [204 words]rajan guptaNov 17, 2007 14:07
re: basic american intelligence [98 words]Henry Davis - AustraliaNov 29, 2007 06:10

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.