Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Mike Huckabee's Unique Foreign Policy
Reader comment on item: Mike Huckabee's Unique Foreign Policy

Submitted by Paul la Demain (United States), Dec 27, 2007 at 18:24

Don't laugh, but Huckabee's onto something when he suggests that a "Palestinian" state (that is, Arab-Islamic state) ought to be parked where it offers no threat to Israel. Let's hope all candidates do some deep thinking along the same lines.

Modest proposal: How 'bout sending the warring Arabs (who've been invading israel for the past 60 years and dropping their anchors on Israel's ground) back to their native homelands? Or, better still, lob off a piece of the Arabian Peninsula and relocate them there? Nothing novel about something like that ... didn't the Islamo-arabs do the very same to the Jews who were native to Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon?

Well, since we are the NON-evangelical Christians for Zion we can say "Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander ... send the Palis packing." Perhaps the soft, malleable Jews ought to pick up and toss a few stones of their own? Perhaps there are practical things that should be done to the Islamic imperialists: like, driving the Arab invaders into the same watery grave where the Saudis and Arafat promised to drown the Jews? No? Viva to the Patriots of Israel who are heroically battling Islamic imperialism.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (22) on this item

Title By Date
I'm not an expert on Huckabee, or terrorism, for that matter, but... [102 words]MeghanMar 17, 2008 03:17
Neville Chamberlain alive and well. [104 words]SanderFeb 14, 2008 16:47
A towering idiot with his nose glued in a Bible [80 words]Kevin MJan 20, 2008 09:41
Read the whole article [48 words]Eric RetzlaffJan 6, 2008 17:57
Please guide me
[w/response] [133 words]
Lion HeartJan 5, 2008 00:05
Mike Huckabee [82 words]Dannel R. BallesterosJan 4, 2008 18:54
Uganda? Birobidjan? [24 words]Stuart TeichJan 2, 2008 08:57
these two quotes are taken out of context [875 words]DrRJPDec 30, 2007 12:46
Huckabee [173 words]Patricia ZentaraDec 29, 2007 14:32
Staggering Idiocy [15 words]Mr. Lucas BriceDec 28, 2007 18:59
Idiotic Contender [164 words]jennifer solisJan 1, 2008 00:11
Huckabee, another man from Hope [77 words]Jo Ellen Davey CohenDec 27, 2007 20:22
⇒ Mike Huckabee's Unique Foreign Policy [201 words]Paul la DemainDec 27, 2007 18:24
well, some of you will hate me for this idea, but so what? [395 words]plusafJan 23, 2008 02:26
RE: Well, some of you will hate me for this idea, but so what? [970 words]Winnie the PoohFeb 1, 2008 19:21
perhaps i wasn't clear enough for you.... [1144 words]plusafFeb 3, 2008 00:02
RE:perhaps I wasn't clear enough for you [121 words]Wiinie the PoohFeb 3, 2008 20:45
Huckabee "apologizes" for Bhutto's assassination? [41 words]Charles MartelDec 27, 2007 16:59
yes... [13 words]plusafJan 24, 2008 00:54
voting for Huckabee? nope, sorry... [632 words]plusafFeb 5, 2008 00:29
Conservative Christian against Huckabee [104 words]Charles MartelDec 27, 2007 13:33
Charles, I'm sorry, but I'm confused...... [48 words]plusafFeb 3, 2008 00:07

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page