|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Appearance on O'Reilly Sept. 30Reader comment on item: The Guantánamo Arrests – What Do They Mean? Submitted by harold fox (United States), Oct 2, 2003 at 01:45 I e-mailed Bill last night that you should have had a chance to respond to the falsehoods that Sarah Eltewani spoke. Since you went first, she could respond to you - but you had no chance to answer her false allegations. I didn't know that you refuse to debate the Islamists at the time. My impression viewing the program was that , while wrong, she was very effective. However, after reading the transcript, it is apparent that your comments made much more sense and Bill O'Reilly was aware of that.Keep up the good work. The American public has to be regularly informed about what is really going on. Harold Fox Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||