2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

A Black converting to Islamism is like a chicken voting for fox rule

Reader comment on item: King of Pop Michael Jackson and Black Converts to Islam
in response to reader comment: Learn the solid FACTS about islam

Submitted by Don Bill (United States), Nov 27, 2007 at 00:14

Islam, Slavery and Rape
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=16027ED9-FFFE-4E3C-B9B6-30E0F0D980FC>http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=16027ED9-FFFE-4E3C-B9B6-30E0F0D980FC

By Jamie Glazov
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, November 22, 2007

Frontpage Interview's guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the
Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and spokesman for
politicalislam.com. CSPI's goal is to teach the doctrine of political
Islam through its books and it has produced an eleven book series on
political Islam. Mr. Warner did not write the CSPI series, but he
acts as the agent for a group of scholars who are the authors. The
Center's latest book is The Submission of Women and Slaves, Islamic
Duality.

FP: Bill Warner, welcome back to Frontpage Magazine. This is the
second part in our two-part series with you on the Center's most
recent book. In the first part we discussed Islam and its doctrine on
the submission of women. In this second and final part we will
discuss the matter of slavery. Welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Warner: It is a pleasure to work with Frontpage.

FP: So tell us in general where Islam stands on slavery.

Warner: Islam's stand on slavery is based on its political principles
of submission and duality. The principle of submission could not be
clearer. By definition a slave is the most submissive of all people.
You become a slave only when you have no more choices. A slave has
completely submitted to a master.

The principle of duality is shown by the fact that Islam does not
enslave Muslims, only kafirs (non-Muslims). Since only kafirs are
enslaved, it assures that more of the world submits to Islam.

Islamic slavery is based on the Trilogy of the Koran, the Sira
(Mohammed's life) and the Hadith (the Traditions of Mohammed). All
three texts say that slavery is permitted, ethical, desirable and a
virtue. There is not one single negative word about slavery.

Slavery is seen as a process that brings kafirs to Islam. It is a
virtue to free slaves, but Mohammed only freed slaves who submitted
to Islam. If the kafir slave does not submit, then their children
will. So given enough time, slaves convert to Islam. That is one of
the reasons that Islam sees slavery as a positive.

Of course, there is another reason that Islam sees slavery as being
so "good" and that is the money. Mohammed and the other jihadists
made a fortune out of enslaving kafirs. Mohammed used the money for
more jihad. So slavery financed the spread of Islam and jihad from
the beginning.

FP: What were the ingredients of Mohammed's own life in terms of slavery?

Warner: Mohammed is the perfect pattern for all humanity and his life
was saturated in slavery. When his mother died, it was a freed slave
who nursed him. His first wife owned slaves. One of his first
converts was a slave. His closest friend, Abu Bakr, traded one of his
black kafir slaves for a Muslim who was enslaved by a kafir.

But all of this was small change compared to his envolvement with
slavery once he turned to jihad. In his first major battle at Badr,
he stood by and prayed as his henchmen beat and tortured captured
slaves to get information about the enemy kafirs.

Slaves made Mohammed's pulpit. Slaves mended his cloths, cooked his
food, and did every thing that a slave does for the master. He gave
away slaves as gifts and received them as gifts. He went to war to
kill the males so that the remaining people would surrender to be
sold as slaves. Mohammed sold slaves on both the retail and wholesale
markets.

He offered captured slaves their freedom if they would first agree
that he was the prophet of Allah. A kafir slave then became a slave
of Allah, because all Muslims are slaves of Allah. For a slave, the
religion of Mohammed started and ended with slavery.

FP: Can you talk a bit about Islam and sexual slavery?

Warner: All morality in Islam is patterned after the example of
Mohammed. Everything that he did and said defines what is permitted
or "good". Mohammed repeatedly sanctioned forced sex (rape) with
kafir females after they were captured. The Hadith clearly reports
that he got first choice of the women. In one case, he repeatedly
demanded one particular woman for himself and swapped two other kafir
slave women for his choice. So if Mohammed was involved in the rape
of kafirs, then rape is a virtue, not a sin or error.

When Mohammed destroyed the B. Qurayza tribe, all of the adult male
Jews were beheaded, so that no husbands were left. Mohammed then took
the children and gave them to Muslims to raise as Muslims and he sold
off the Jewish women as slaves.

We know from another story that the women were divided into sex
slaves and domestic slaves. In one scene, a jihadist is trying to
obtain a high ransom for a woman and he is told that her breasts are
flat and her mouth is cold, so her value was less. In short, she was
only good for work around the house, not in the bedroom.

The Hadith tells of another story where the Muslims used coitus
interruptus to avoid impregnating the kafir sex slaves. The reason
was purely for business. If the kafir sex slave was pregnant, then
she was worth less money.

Islamic doctrine says that kafir women should not be used for
prostitutes, only for the pleasure of the master.

When Mohammed attacked the Jews at Khaybar, many moral precedents
were set. Sexual slavery received an entire set of rules. Muslims
were not to rape pregnant or menstruating women until they had
delivered the child or finished their periods. At Khaybar, Mohammed's
god Allah, announced that even married women were fair game for rape.

Mohammed only killed some of the Jews at Khaybar. The male and female
survivors were needed to work the land as dhimmis. (The original
dhimmis were semi-slaves with no civil rights. Today, dhimmis are
ignorant kafirs who apologize for Islam.) Since Islam needed the men
to work, husbands were left alive. That was the reason that the Koran
said that in this case, even with the husbands looking on, it was
good to rape the women.

Sexual slavery was not only fun and profitable for the Muslim men,
but rape was a powerful tactic of war, then and today. The women are
forced into submission to Muslim men and the husbands are humiliated.
Humiliated men are weakened men, so more kafirs were less able to
resist Islam.

For some time Mohammed's favorite sex partner was a Christian slave
from Egypt named Mary. One of Mohammed's wives caught him in some
state of intimacy with Mary in the wife's bedroom and raised hell.
Mohammed promised to not do it again and moved Mary to her own
apartment in Medina.

Mohammed had received Mary and her sister as gifts. He gave her
sister away to a Muslim poet. He was used to giving away sex slaves.
He gave several of his top lieutenants kafir sex slaves. Umar, who
later became caliph, gave his sex slave to his son. [As an aside,
when he was caliph, his son got drunk and Umar beat him to death.]

FP: This institution of Islamic sexual slavery isn't just a reality
of the past is it?

Warner: Everything that has been said up to now is not only history;
it is Sunna (the example of the perfect pattern of action and
morality found in Mohammed). So today we don't have a beautiful
blonde Christian girl on the block in Mecca, but we have continuous
and ongoing rapes by Muslims in kafir cities. This goes on everywhere
that Islam goes because it is Sunna.

This is a continuous 1400-year history of jihad. In every detailed
history that comes from the original documents from history, rape is
a constant. You have to look in the original documents, since our
historians refuse to report it in so-called history books.

Rape is Sunna. Rape is not a sin. Rape is permitted and encouraged by
Mohammed and the Koran. Islam is the only political system in the
world that includes rules for rape and war. Rape is jihad. How good
can it get? A Muslim gets to rape a kafir girl and get heaven
credits. All jihad is a ticket to Paradise.

The most disgusting aspect of the Islamic rape of kafirs is not the
rapes, but the kafir response. Kafirs become dhimmis by ignoring the
rapes. I challenge you to find one, even one, mention of Islamic rape
in the history books.

Islamic rape is more taboo than the N-word in the media. At least the
N-word is acknowledged to exist. Even unicorns exist in media
fantasy. But Islamic rape is forbidden to even exist as a fantasy.

And to reach a fevered rant: our so-called "feminist" scholars are
absolutely intellectually and morally bankrupt hypocrites. They are
traitors to our culture and a shame and a disgrace. They remain
silent in the face of heinous crimes against women. They are
arch-dhimmis when they refuse to speak of the Sunna, history and
current rapes of our daughters, mothers, and sisters.

And our tax dollars support their evil in our public universities.

FP: Mohammed was a white man and had black slaves, correct? Isn't
there a racism here? Where is all the leftist indignation against
Islam on this issue?

Warner: The relationship between blacks and slavery is ironic. A
standard approach of Islam to blacks is that Christianity is the
religion of the white man and Islam is the natural religion of the
black man. They add that Mohammed's second convert was a black slave,
Bilal, who was Mohammed's companion and the first muezzin (the man
who calls to prayer).

The Hadith, however, goes out of its way, many times, to tell the
world that Mohammed was a white man. The Hadith also tells us the
race of the kafirs that Mohammed enslaved. And Mohammed had many
black slaves in his household. One of his slaves was a black man
called, Anjasha.

Mohammed owned black slaves. It is that simple. His favorite wife,
the child Aisha, had a black slave. But to be fair to Mohammed, he
was not a racist about slavery. He enslaved Arabs, Africans, and
Greeks. Islam enslaves all kafirs, independent of race.

Mohammed was politically incorrect about blacks and called them
"raisin heads" in the Hadith. Thus it would be a compliment to call a
black Muslim a "raisin head." It would be Sunna and not offensive.
Mohammed also said that Muslims are to obey the Islamic leader, "even
if they were black." A left-handed compliment, at best.

Mohammed used his robe to shield Aisha, so she could watch black
slaves perform a martial arts routine in the mosque. The Hadith tells
of a prophecy about a black man bringing evil to Islam. Black men
were prophesized to destroy the Kabah.

But when Muslims preach to blacks they only say that Islam's first
muezzin was a black man. They don't tell the rest of the story.

FP: Can you give us a brief synopsis of the history of Islamic slavery?

Warner: It all started with Mohammed and then went worldwide.

When Islam burst out of Arabia into the kafir world, they took the
wealth and slaves. Slavery was an unapologetic part of jihad.

The Arabic language is a good place to see how important slavery was.
In The Submission of Women and Slaves, we collected over 30 Arabic
words that deal with slavery. We think that Arabic has more words for
slaves than any other language.
Both a black African and a black slave have the same name, abd. The
historical reason for this is that African slavery was so important
to Islamic economics. Language reflects history. Islamic legal
history is filled with the complaints by African Muslim jurists about
how Arabic Muslim slave traders captured African Muslims and sold
them on the auction block.

History records around 11,000,000 Africans being sent to the Americas
and about 13,000,000 being sent to Islamic countries for a total of
24,000,000 African slaves. To get one slave, many others have to be
killed for the tribe to surrender to enslavement. The old, sick and
children are left behind to starve. These collateral deaths are
conservatively estimated to about 5 to 1. So that implies that over
1400 years, 120,000,000 million Africans have been killed to furnish
Islam with its profits.

The accepted history of race in the U.S. is that white men captured
Africans, brought them to the U.S. and sold them as slaves. This is
wrong. When the white slavers showed up on the west coast of Africa,
they didn't capture Africans. They looked them over in the pens, gave
the Muslim slave traders their money, took their bills of sale, and
loaded their purchases into their boats.

The Muslims had been plying the trade of war, capture, enslavement,
and sale for a thousand years. Mohammed was a slave trader. Long
after the white slave traders quit, the Muslims continued their
African slave trade. It still exists today.

And to put a fine point on it, many African slaves were castrated by
removing both testicles and penis. Castrated slaves brought more on
the slave block. Castrated blacks were the traditional keepers of
Mohammed's mosque in Medina.

African slaves were called abd; white slaves were called mamluk. Most
black slaves were used in mining and heavy fieldwork. White slaves
were used more for skilled trades. White slaves were even promoted to
leadership positions, if they converted. Only one black slave was
promoted to leadership. He ruled Egypt and was a eunuch.

Over a million white slaves were taken from Europe. Our word, slave,
comes from Slav. A white woman was the highest price slave for 1400
years on the Meccan auction block. The Muslim who could not afford a
white sex slave choose an Ethiopian woman at a third of the price.

The most revolting enslavement of whites was how Turkish Muslims took
as a tax, one out of five Christian children in Islamic ruled Eastern
Europe. These male children were taken back to Turkey where they
became the janissaries, elite soldiers for the sultan. The Turkish
sultans did not trust tribal Muslims to be the elite palace guards,
since they all harbored ancient tribal rivalries. We see the same
distrust of Muslim tribal politics in Afghanistan, where kafirs are
used as presidential guards.

The Hindus were enslaved, but we don't have the number. We do know
that jihad took half of ancient Hindustan and killed 80,000,000
Hindus. We have accountings of Hindus being enslaved by the hundreds
of thousands at a time.

Muslims enslave everyone, but no one enslaves Muslims. This knowledge
is part of Islam's arrogance and superiority. They know the history;
it is the dhimmis (kafir apologists) who are ignorant of the doctrine
and history of Islamic slavery.

FP: The violent capture and enslavement of black Africans by Muslim
Arabs continues to this today. The root of this modern-day slavery
is, of course, Islamic doctrine.

Warner: The enslavement of Africans is happening today. The only
reason that Islam stopped enslaving whites and Hindus is that Islam
is too weak to resist the social pressure. The Sunna of slavery has
not changed, just the ability to use their law.

In the African countryside Muslims are still using jihad to enrich
themselves. I have spoken with a Sudanese slave who escaped. The
Muslims killed his parents and took him and his sister. Each night
the jihadists gang raped his sister. Remember, rape is Sunna.

When he met his new masters, they put him in the middle of a circle
of the family and each beat him with a stick. He was told that his
new name was Abd, black slave. He slept in the barn with the animals.

Our media and intellectuals are quick to punish the slightest insult
by a white against a black man, but they have not the slightest
recognition of murder, rape and enslavement of blacks by Islam. Our
media and intellectuals are dhimmis.

FP: Final thoughts and comments?

Warner: Slavery is the fruit of Islamic duality. Mohammed, the master
of dualism and submission, used slavery as a tool of jihad because it
worked. Mohammed's life was infused with slavery. Slaves were the
lifeblood of Islam. Mohammed, the white man, owned both male and
female black slaves. His attitude was pure dualism.

The most disgusting thing about Islamic slavery is not that Muslims
enslave others, but that we ignore it. The Muslims have been fed the
Koran and the Sunna in their mother's milk. They are doing what is
ethical according to Islam. In a strange way, Muslims are to be
pitied. A Muslim is the first victim of Islam.

The criticism of whites because of their being involved in slavery is
standard fair in the media and the universities. Try to find a
university that even teaches about the killing of 120,000,000
Africans for Muslims to profit from the 24,000,000 slaves.

Blacks define themselves on the basis of slavery. They will not go
beyond the white, Christian version of slavery. There is only one
theory of history in the black community-the West African Limited
Edition version of history. Blacks will not admit the broad scope of
slave history. Hindu slavery? It never happened. White and European
slavery? It never happened. Slavery on the East coast of Africa? It
never happened. A massive slave trade through the Sahara into North
Africa? It never happened. Black, eunuchs at the Medina mosque? It
never happened. This incomplete history of slavery is what the
taxpayers fund in the state universities.

How can black leaders ignore Islam's sacred violence in Africa? Why
aren't the black columnists, writers, professors, or ministers
speaking out? They are ignorant and in total denial. They are the
molested children of Islam.

Blacks are dhimmis and serve Islam with their silence. There is a
deep fear of Islam that makes them overlook and placate Islam. Arabs
are the masters of blacks.

One thing whites and blacks have in common is that their ancestors
were enslaved by Islam, and both are too ignorant to know it. Blacks
and whites have a secret shame buried under the denial of being
slaves inside Islam.

But the rest of the media and intellectuals line up as dhimmis, too.
One of the marks of a dhimmi under the fourth caliph, Umar, was that
a dhimmi was forbidden to study the Koran. The chief mark of
dhimmitude today is ignorance of the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith.
The ignorance of kafir intellectuals about Islam is profound.

They don't know about how jihad killed the 120,000,000 Africans, the
60,000,000 Christians, the 80,000,000 Hindus or the 10,000,000
Buddhists. Our intellectuals do not know about the Tears of Jihad
(detailed in all of our books). That is a lot of death and
ignorance-270,000,000 dead. Our intellectuals don't know, don't care
and don't bother. They deny.

University Islamic studies never mention the Islamic political
doctrine. The media discusses Islam in terms of political
correctness, and multiculturalism. History courses don't teach about
the civilizational annihilation due to jihad. Religious leaders
placate imams in public gatherings and have no knowledge what the
imam actually thinks of them. Political thinkers do not even know
Islam as a political force

The problem with this ignorance is that our intellectuals are unable
to help us. They do not understand that Islam is a civilization based
upon the ideal of dualism. Islamic ethics and politics have one set
of rules for Muslims and another for kafirs. Our civilization is
based upon the ideal of unitary ethics, the Golden Rule. We do not
have two sets of laws and ethics, like Islam. Our intellectuals
cannot explain what dualism has meant in the past or what it will
mean for our future-civilizational annihilation.

Our intellectuals and the media have only one view of Islam-a
glorious civilization. They have created the "terrorist", a bogus
term based upon ignorance. And the "terrorist" is not even a "real"
Muslim, but an extremist fundamentalist. All of these terms are based
upon a profound ignorance of Islamic political doctrine.

Intellectuals cannot connect the dots of persecution of other
intellectuals and artists today, such as Salman Rushdie, Theo van
Gogh, the Mohammed cartoon riots, and Daniel Pearl. Their persecution
is part of a 1400 year Islamic tradition of keeping all intellectuals
and artists in line with the doctrine of political Islam. But for our
intellectuals, there is no history, no connection, no pattern, no
doctrine of Islam. Their only doctrine is the doctrine of denial.
These intellectuals write our textbooks. Then our tax dollars buy the
books to feed the ignorance.

What explains the intellectuals' silence and ignorance? The enormous
violence of jihad has produced the psychology of the "molested child"
syndrome. Intellectuals fear, apologize for, and placate the Islamic
abusers, ignoring the violence of the past. Then they turn around and
advise our politicians. The result is an ignorant populace who look
to our intellectuals for guidance and find treachery and lies.

FP: Bill Warner, thank you for joining us.

Warner: Thank you for standing against political Islam.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to A Black converting to Islamism is like a chicken voting for fox rule by Don Bill

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)