Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Islam and Islamists, and the changes over time.
Reader comment on item: Preface

Submitted by Gabe Newhouse (United States), Nov 24, 2007 at 04:09

Re: Islam vs. Islamism and the changes over time: Two very important factors, it seems to me, are at work and are never acknowledged in the major media. One, the economics of oil, which has become predominant in the Islamic world in the last 50 years, gives rise to extremist politics which seek to protect their economic assets and thus their power. It also provides them the fuel for spreading the extremism to other countries. Second, even more important, the new information technology now requires that those who wish to maintain power must brainwash their subjects ever more thoroughly at earlier ages.

They must instill such irrational hatred against all aspects of what we consider the "good life", democracy, or freedom that no exposure to these can penetrate their people's emotional mindset and thus upset the control that those in power wish to maintain. The rise of global television coverage has made free access to all news a dangerous thing to many governments and to many cultures. This didn't use to be a threat to them. Now it is.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (30) on this item

Title By Date
What future is in store? [235 words]GWKDec 12, 2007 21:13
Take The Fight To The Root Of The Problem [808 words]GeoffNov 28, 2007 01:12
Contradictions are okay in Islam [202 words]HomefrontDec 3, 2007 19:13
A question for Dr. Pipes
[w/response] [60 words]
SullyNov 26, 2007 16:49
Reflections on Dr Pipe's review of recent book on Islam
[w/response] [169 words]
Sheldon KalmutzNov 26, 2007 13:15
Why don't we try to understand Buddhism [414 words]Rachel GarberNov 25, 2007 20:05
Islam and Islamism NOT Fundamentally Different? [502 words]Ron ThompsonNov 25, 2007 14:03
Ron Thompson [88 words]B.K. NambiarNov 26, 2007 04:16
It Only Takes 1% IntoleranceTo Start A War [247 words]GeoffNov 29, 2007 10:18
Islam is radical in its nature [148 words]Elpi NipiNov 25, 2007 06:32
Why I left Islam. [292 words]zari namdarNov 24, 2007 04:17
⇒ Islam and Islamists, and the changes over time. [179 words]Gabe NewhouseNov 24, 2007 04:09
Is Islam suicidal? [152 words]B.F.Nov 23, 2007 21:04
Differentiate between Islamism and moderate Islam [289 words]f.shaNov 23, 2007 02:27
Against the tide [142 words]AlanNov 23, 2007 00:39
Alan you are right! [126 words]kid berthaNov 23, 2007 11:49
Another way of getting information out. [479 words]Harry SweeneyNov 22, 2007 20:55
Column Name for the Muslim Dialogues [19 words]Harry SweeneyNov 23, 2007 11:08
Freedom of Speech about Islam [183 words]DavidNov 22, 2007 19:34
Modern version of Islam [50 words]H.MNov 22, 2007 18:45
Dr. Delcamba [25 words]lawrence BatesNov 22, 2007 18:16
The Koran [159 words]f.shaNov 24, 2007 02:26
Quran, arabic, muslims and transalations [54 words]bosNov 27, 2007 06:08
What Are We To Do? [273 words]GeoffNov 28, 2007 14:35
Koran [110 words]f.shaNov 28, 2007 23:22
We cannot do this ! [105 words]Anne-Marie DelcambreNov 29, 2007 02:31
Western Strategy fighting Islamism [126 words]Janusz KowalikNov 22, 2007 17:28
Caution [191 words]BeowulfNov 22, 2007 17:13
Islam [29 words]Kim SegarNov 22, 2007 17:11
A point of distinction ? [47 words]Jiri SeveraNov 22, 2007 17:03

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page