Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Re:
Reader comment on item: The American University in Cairo v. Israel

Submitted by IRC President (Egypt), Nov 13, 2007 at 06:55

And the AUC is the one of the most (if not the most) expensive educational institution in Egypt, also US tax payers support the Egyptian (and other Arabic) fascistic government way more than the way they support this institution (if this happens in the first place).

I really do not see what is the problem with the whole thing?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (10) on this item

Title By Date
What do you expect? [26 words]David W. LincolnNov 27, 2007 11:39
"Soufi ou mufti?' [179 words]Suren SukhtankarNov 27, 2007 08:39
uhh [10 words]Yasser El ShararaJan 10, 2008 05:01
No, it is not terrorism [23 words]Suren SukhtankarJan 11, 2008 18:04
War is terrorism [87 words]Yasser El ShararaJan 15, 2008 03:25
separate issue [104 words]Bassem KhalifaNov 13, 2007 08:54
⇒ Re: [59 words]IRC PresidentNov 13, 2007 06:55
No Israeli Professors because of Egyptian Laws? [68 words]RyanNov 13, 2007 00:29
"Something pandering and ignoble..." [51 words]The Sanity InspectorNov 12, 2007 16:18
pandering to Arab prejudices [75 words]Elliott A GreenNov 12, 2007 09:02

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page